HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Cited by other online articles Google Scholar Articles by Slade, J. M. Articles by Cress, M. E. Articles citing this Article PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Slade, J. M. Articles by Cress, M. E.

Anaerobic Power and Physical Function in Strength-Trained and Non–Strength-Trained Older Adults

^a Department of Exercise Science, University of Georgia, Athens
^b Athens Heart Center, Athens

Jill M. Slade, Department of Exercise Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 E-mail: jslade{at}coe.uga.edu.

Decision Editor: John E. Morley, MB, BCh

Background. Challenging daily tasks, such as transferring heavy items or rising from the floor, may be dependent on the ability to generate short bursts of energy anaerobically. The purposes of this study were to determine if strength-trained (ST) older adults have higher anaerobic power output compared with non–strength-trained (NST) older adults and to determine the relationship between anaerobic power and performance-based physical function.

Methods. Thirty-five men and women (age 71.5 ± 6.4 years, mean ± SD; NST: n = 18, ST: n = 17) were grouped by training status. Outcome variables included relative anaerobic power (Wingate test), physical function measured with the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance Test (CS-PFP, scaled 0 to 100), and anthropometric lean thigh volume (LTV). Analysis of covariance (with age and sex as covariates) was used to determine group differences in the dependent variables listed above. Pearson's r was used to determine the relationship between anaerobic power, CS-PFP total score (TOT), and CS-PFP lower body strength domain score (LBS).

Results. The ST group had significantly higher mean anaerobic power (NST 58.9 ± 16 W/l, ST 96.3 ± 23 W/l), CS-PFP total (NST 61.2 ± 13, ST 73.7 ± 8), and LBS (NST 54.1 ± 17, ST 70.9 ± 8) compared with the NST group (p < .05). However, LTV was similar for both groups (NST 3.323 ± 0.75; ST 3.179 ± 0.79), which suggests that the ST group had higher muscle quality compared with the NST group. Anaerobic power was significantly related to TOT (r = .611, p = .001) and LBS (r = .650, p = .001).

Conclusions. High levels of physical function in ST older adults may in part be explained by higher levels of anaerobic power associated with strength training.

This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)

				I G Fatouros, A Kambas, I Katrabasas, K Nikolaidis, A Chatzinikolaou, D Leontsini, and K Taxildaris Strength training and detraining effects on muscular strength, anaerobic power, and mobility of inactive older men are intensity dependent Br. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2005; 39(10): 776 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Hawkins, R. A. Wiswell, and T. J. Marcell Exercise and the Master Athlete--A Model of Successful Aging? J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2003; 58(11): M1009 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Morley Editorial: Sarcopenia Revisited J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., October 1, 2003; 58(10): M909 - 910. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Miszko, M. E. Cress, J. M. Slade, C. J. Covey, S. K. Agrawal, and C. E. Doerr Effect of Strength and Power Training on Physical Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., February 1, 2003; 58(2): M171 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]