HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Cited by other online articles Google Scholar Articles by Miszko, T. A. Articles by Doerr, C. E. Articles citing this Article PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miszko, T. A. Articles by Doerr, C. E.

Effect of Strength and Power Training on Physical Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

¹ Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia.
² Department of Exercise Science, University of Georgia, Athens.
³ Physician's Back and Neck Clinic
⁴ Athens Heart Center, Athens, Georgia.

Background. The performance of daily tasks, such as stair climbing or lifting an object, requires both muscle strength and power. Age-associated reductions in strength and power can affect an older adult's ability to complete daily tasks such as stair climbing and lifting a child.

Methods. The purposes of this study were to determine whether power training was more efficacious than strength training for improving whole-body physical function in older adults and to examine the relationship between changes in anaerobic power and muscle strength and changes in physical function. Thirty-nine men and women (mean age ± SD = 72.5 ± 6.3 years) with below-average leg extensor power were randomly assigned to control (C, n = 15), strength-training (ST, n = 13) or power-training (PT, n = 11) groups. The ST and PT groups met 3 days per week for 16 weeks; the C group maintained usual activity and attended three lectures during the course of the study. Primary outcome measures included the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test, maximal strength, and anaerobic power.

Results. After baseline was controlled for, the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test total score was significantly greater for the PT group than for the ST (p =.033) and C (p =.016) groups. Maximal strength was significantly greater for the ST group than for the C group (p =.015) after the intervention. There was no significant difference between groups for peak anaerobic power.

Conclusions. Power training was more effective than strength training for improving physical function in community-dwelling older adults.

This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)

				E. J. Metter, L. A. Talbot, M. Schrager, and R. A. Conwit Arm-cranking muscle power and arm isometric muscle strength are independent predictors of all-cause mortality in men J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2004; 96(2): 814 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Hawkins, R. A. Wiswell, and T. J. Marcell Exercise and the Master Athlete--A Model of Successful Aging? J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2003; 58(11): M1009 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]