HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Symons, T. B. Articles by Marsh, G. D. Articles citing this Article PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Symons, T. B. Articles by Marsh, G. D.

Reliability of a Single-Session Isokinetic and Isometric Strength Measurement Protocol in Older Men

Canadian Centre for Activity and Aging, ¹ Schools of Kinesiology
² Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Address correspondence to Anthony A. Vandervoort, PhD, Schools of Kinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, Room 1400, Elborn College, 1201 Western Road, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H1. E-mail: vandervo{at}uwo.ca

Background. The purposes of the current study were (a) to determine the test–retest reliability of a single-session isokinetic and isometric strength testing protocol in older healthy men, and (b) to compare the outcomes of the reliability measures derived from averaged torque scores with those derived from a single peak torque score.

Methods. In 19 men (mean age, 72 ± 5 years), both lower limbs were assessed independently on 2 separate test days using the Biodex System 3 dynamometer. After completing a 5-minute warm-up, each man performed three submaximal knee extensions followed by five maximal contractions at 90°/s (CON), 0°/s (ISO), and –90°/s (ECC). Average (best 3 of 5) and peak CON, ISO, and ECC torque, and CON work and CON power were determined. Peak CON work and CON power were recorded from the highest peak torque concentric contraction (HPTCC).

Results. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 were found to have good reliability. The typical error as a coefficient of variation ranged from 8% to 10% for averaged measures and from 8% to 17% for peak torque and HPTCC. The ratio limits of agreement for average and peak CON, ISO, and ECC torque ranged from 23% to 33% and from 40% to 54% for average CON and HPTCC work and power.

Conclusions. The test–retest reliability of a single-session isokinetic and isometric strength testing protocol in this group of older healthy men displayed good relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.84); however, because the typical error as a coefficient of variation and ratio limits of agreement (absolute reliability) were large, single-session testing is not recommended.