HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Cited by other online articles Google Scholar Articles by Melzer, D. Articles by Guralnik, J. M. Articles citing this Article PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Melzer, D. Articles by Guralnik, J. M.

Variation in Thresholds for Reporting Mobility Disability Between National Population Subgroups and Studies

¹ Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, U.K.
² MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, U.K.
³ Department of Psychiatry and Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
⁴ Laboratory of Epidemiology, Demography, and Biometry, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland.

Address correspondence to Dr. David Melzer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, U.K. E-mail: dm214{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk

 Background. Disability questions require older people to report difficulties with everyday activities, using broad categorical responses. Relatively little is known about population group differences in the thresholds for reporting difficulty or inability with medium-distance mobility against tested mobility-related performance. We aimed to estimate the thresholds on tested performance at which self-reports change from one category to another, across a range of sociodemographic subgroups. We also aimed to compare reported and tested performance across two national population studies.

 Methods. The samples were from the third U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES III) and the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA). Measures of gait speed, chair stands, and peak expiratory flow rate in both studies yielded the validated index of mobility-related physical limitations (MOBLI). Latent probit models were used to estimate cutpoints (thresholds) on the index for reporting difficulty or inability to walk a medium distance.

 Results. Thresholds for reporting difficulty or inability were studied by age, sex, race, educational level, and income in NHANES III. In models adjusting for the other factors, performance thresholds for reporting disability categories varied by age and income. The younger elderly persons in NHANES III on average reported difficulties or inabilities only when they reached a more severe level of tested limitation compared with older old persons. A similar pattern exists for those on higher incomes. For race, differences in threshold were present only for reporting inability, but not difficulty. Significant differences in thresholds were not present between groups defined by sex or for years of education. Comparisons between the NHANES and LASA studies show that lower reported mobility difficulty or inability prevalence in the Dutch sample is attributable both to reporting at higher levels of limitation and to better functioning.

 Conclusions. There is evidence of differences in thresholds for reporting mobility disability, especially across age and income groups in older Americans. Further work is needed to understand the perceptual, attitudinal, or environmental factors that cause these reporting differences.

This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)

				D. Melzer, M. G. Dik, G. J. van Kamp, C. Jonker, and D. J. Deeg The Apolipoprotein E e4 Polymorphism Is Strongly Associated With Poor Mobility Performance Test Results But Not Self-Reported Limitation in Older People J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., October 1, 2005; 60(10): 1319 - 1323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]