Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
 		Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, R. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, P. E.
Right arrow Articles citing this Article
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, R. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, P. E.
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 59:M1036-M1040 (2004)
© 2004 The Gerontological Society of America

Teaching Physicians Geriatric Principles: A Randomized Control Trial on Academic Detailing Plus Printed Materials Versus Printed Materials Only

Roger Y. Wong and Philip E. Lee

Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Hospital & Health Sciences Centre, Canada.

Address correspondence to Roger Wong, MD, FRCPC, HP-A7, 855 West 12th Ave., Vancouver, BC, Canada, V5Z 1M9. E-mail: rymwong{at}interchange.ubc.ca

Background. We compared the effectiveness of academic detailing with printed materials, versus printed materials only, on promoting geriatric knowledge among physicians.

Methods. 31 physicians were randomly assigned to receive academic detailing plus printed materials (group 1 intervention, n = 16), or printed materials alone (group 2 control, n = 15), on 5 geriatric topics identified from a needs assessment survey. Two participants withdrew from group 2, leaving 13 in the control group. Both groups received printed educational materials between baseline and time 1, and at time 2. Only group 1 received an additional 15-minute, one-on-one education session with a geriatrician at time 2. The primary endpoint was knowledge retention, measured by the numeric score of a 5-item questionnaire (range 0 to 5), comprised of items from the Geriatrics Knowledge Test. Knowledge retention was measured at baseline, 1 week (time 1), and on average 29 weeks later (time 2).

Results. Most participants were postgraduate trainees. The mean knowledge score in all participants decreased from 3.6 ± 1.2 at baseline to 3.1 ± 1.2 at time 1 (p =.006). 19 participants (9 in group 1 and 10 in group 2) completed the knowledge questionnaire at time 2. At baseline, group 1 scored lower than group 2 (3.4 ± 1.3 versus 3.8 ± 1.1, p =.39); whereas at time 2, group 1 scored significantly higher than group 2 (4.7 ± 0.7 versus 3.9 ± 0.7, p =.034). Academic detailing plus printed materials produced higher mean score change from baseline (1.1 ± 1.3) than printed materials alone (0.0 ± 1.1, p =.053).

Conclusions. Academic detailing plus printed materials improved knowledge retention among physicians, whereas printed materials only did not.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2004 by The Gerontological Society of America.