HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Cited by other online articles Google Scholar Articles by Lan, T.-Y. Articles by Melzer, D. Articles citing this Article PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lan, T.-Y. Articles by Melzer, D.

Responsiveness of the Index of Mobility Limitation: Comparison With Gait Speed Alone in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam

¹ Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, U.K.
² Department of Psychiatry and Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
³ Laboratory of Epidemiology, Demography, and Biometry, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland.

Background. Interpreting self-reported disability differences between diverse older populations is complicated by differences in attitudes and environment. We have previously reported on the index of mobility-related limitation tests (MOBLI), and shown that it predicts mortality over 4 years. In this article, we examine whether the index is responsive to changes in self-reported mobility disability.

Methods. Data on gait speed, time to complete 5 chair stands, and peak expiratory flow rate, with self-reported difficulty walking for 5 minutes, were available from the baseline and two 3-year follow-ups in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Analysis used data on changes in the index (or walking speed alone) and corresponding change over 3 years in self-reported difficulty or inability with a medium-distance walk.

Results. During all follow-ups, groups reporting deterioration in functioning had relatively larger changes in gait speed and MOBLI score than did the "no deterioration" groups. In comparative analyses of responsiveness, the MOBLI score had a larger responsiveness index, higher odds ratios, and larger receiving operating characteristic area than gait speed alone.

Conclusions. The MOBLI index of mobility-related physical limitation tests is responsive to changes in self-reported mobility disability over two 3-year periods, and performs better than gait speed alone. This property is strongly supportive of its validity for epidemiological comparison of older populations across countries or over longer periods of time.

This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)

				M. Montero-Odasso, M. Schapira, E. R. Soriano, M. Varela, R. Kaplan, L. A. Camera, and L. M. Mayorga Gait Velocity as a Single Predictor of Adverse Events in Healthy Seniors Aged 75 Years and Older J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., October 1, 2005; 60(10): 1304 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]