HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Cited by other online articles Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, T. E. Articles by Vaupel, J. W. Articles citing this Article PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnson, T. E. Articles by Vaupel, J. W.

Age-Specific Demographic Profiles of Longevity Mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans Show Segmental Effects

^a Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder
^b Max-Planck-Institut fur Demografische Forschung, Rostock, Germany

Thomas E. Johnson, Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Box 447, Boulder, CO 80309 E-mail: johnsont{at}colorado.edu.

Decision Editor: John A. Faulkner, PhD

Demographic profiles of several single-gene longevity mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans reveal segmental (age-specific) effects on mortality. The mortality profiles of wild-type worms were examined across multiple replicate cultures containing 100,000 or more nematodes and found to be quite replicable, although clear environmental effects are routinely found. The combined profile of wild type was compared with those of three long-lived mutants to determine how age-specific mortality is altered by mutations in age-1, clk-1, or spe-26. In all four genotypes, death rates fit a two-stage Gompertz model better than a one-stage Gompertz; that is, mortality levels off at later ages. The largest genetic effect on mortality was that of an age-1 mutation, which lowered mortality more than fivefold at most later ages. In contrast, a spe-26 mutant had a tenfold lower mortality until approximately 2 weeks of age but ultimately achieved a higher mortality, whereas clk-1 mutants show slightly higher mortality than wild type during the fertile period, early in life, but ultimately level off at lower mortality. Each mutant thus has a distinctive profile of age-specific mortalities that could suggest the time of action of each gene.

This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)

				E. P. Caswell-Chen, J. Chen, E. E. Lewis, G. W. Douhan, S. A. Nadler, and J. R. Carey Revising the Standard Wisdom of C. elegans Natural History: Ecology of Longevity Sci. Aging Knowl. Environ., October 5, 2005; 2005(40): pe30 - pe30. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. E. Johnson Genes, Phenes, and Dreams of Immortality: The 2003 Kleemeier Award Lecture J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2005; 60(6): 680 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Olshansky, L. Hayflick, and B. A. Carnes Position Statement on Human Aging Sci. Aging Knowl. Environ., June 19, 2002; 2002(24): pe9 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. E. Morley Editorial: Hot Topics in Geriatrics J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., January 1, 2003; 58(1): M30 - 36. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Arking, J. Novoseltseva, D.-S. Hwangbo, V. Novoseltsev, and M. Lane Different Age-Specific Demographic Profiles Are Generated in the Same Normal-Lived Drosophila Strain by Different Longevity Stimuli J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2002; 57(11): B390 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Olshansky, L. Hayflick, and B. A. Carnes Position Statement on Human Aging J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., August 1, 2002; 57(8): B292 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]