HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Cited by other online articles Google Scholar Articles by Schenkman, M. Articles by Kuchibhatla, M. Articles citing this Article PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schenkman, M. Articles by Kuchibhatla, M.

Spinal Flexibility and Balance Control Among Community-Dwelling Adults With and Without Parkinson's Disease

^a Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver
^b Claude D. Pepper Center, Center on Aging,
^c Division of Biometry, Department of Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
^d Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Margaret Schenkman, Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, C-244, Denver, CO 80262-0244 E-mail: margaret.schenkman{at}UCHSC.edu.

William B. Ershler, MD

Background. One area of research that requires further elaboration is the relationship between impairments and functional limitations. By identifying specific contributors to functional limitations, it may be possible to establish intervention strategies, including exercise approaches, that can delay or ameliorate decline in function. The association between impaired spinal flexibility and functional limitations has not been studied in depth. The purposes of this study were to determine (a) the associations between spinal flexibility and functional limitations; (b) the relative contribution of spinal flexibility to specific functional limitations; and (c) how disease state (Parkinson's disease [PD] vs no PD) modified these relationships.

Methods. Participants included 251 community-dwelling adults, 56 of whom were with diagnosed PD and 195 were without PD or other specific disorders. Measures included spinal flexibility (i.e., functional axial rotation [FAR]) and configuration (i.e., thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis), functional limitations (i.e., functional reach, supine-to-stand time, 10-m walk, and 360° turn).

Results. Canonical correlation (Can R) demonstrated significant associations between spinal measures and functional limitations (Can R = .488, p = .0001). After controlling for age, gender, race, body mass index, comorbidity, confidence, and depression, a multivariate regression model demonstrated that spinal flexibility contributed significantly to functional reach (R² = .334 for the overall model, p = .0001). Based on the parameter estimate of 0.026, the results predict that FAR accounts for a 4.6-inch difference in reach distance between the least and most flexible of the participants. In addition, there were significant differences between almost all measurements for the PD compared with the non-PD participants.

Conclusion. Results clearly implicate spinal flexibility as a contributor to functional reach, a measure of functional limitation and an established measure of balance control. Further work is needed to determine the extent to which spinal flexibility can be improved and the effect of that improvement on balance.

This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)

				M. L Schenkman, K. Clark, T. Xie, M. Kuchibhatla, M. Shinberg, and L. Ray Spinal Movement and Performance of a Standing Reach Task in Participants With and Without Parkinson Disease Physical Therapy, August 1, 2001; 81(8): 1400 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]