Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol 54, Issue 11 M534-M540, Copyright © 1999 by The Gerontological Society of America

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Clock Drawing Test: utility for dementia detection in multiethnic elders

S Borson, M Brush, E Gil, J Scanlan, P Vitaliano, J Chen, J Cashman, MM Sta Maria, R Barnhart and J Roques
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Satellite Diagnostic Clinic and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. [email protected]

BACKGROUND: Disproportionate increases in dementia morbidity in ethnic minorities challenge established screening methodologies because of language and culture barriers, varying access to health services, and a relative paucity of cross-cultural data validating their use. Simple screening techniques adapted to a range of health and social service settings would accelerate dementia detection and social and health services planning for demented minority elders. METHODS: The effectiveness of the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) for dementia detection was compared with that of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) in community- dwelling elders of diverse linguistic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds. Subjects (N = 295) were tested at home in their native languages (English, n = 141; another language, n = 154). An informant- based clinical dementia history and functional severity index derived from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) protocols were used to classify subjects as probably demented (n = 170), and probably not demented (n = 125). RESULTS: All tests were significantly affected by education (p < .001) but not by primary language (p > .05). Sensitivities and specificities for probable dementia were 82% and 92%, respectively, for the CDT; 92% and 92% for the MMSE; and 93% and 97% for the CASI for subjects completing each test. However, in poorly educated non-English speakers, the CDT detected demented subjects with higher sensitivity than the two longer instruments (sensitivity and specificity 85% and 94% for the CDT, 46% and 100% for the MMSE, and 75% and 95% for the CASI). Moreover less information was lost due to noncompletion of the CDT than the MMSE or CASI (severe dementia or refusal: CDT 8%, MMSE 12%, and CASI 16%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the CDT may be as effective as the MMSE or CASI as a first-level dementia screen for clinical use in multiethnic, multilingual samples of older adults. Its brevity (1-5 minutes), minimal language requirements, high acceptability, and lack of dependence on specialized testing materials are well adapted for screening of non-English-speaking elderly persons in settings where bilingual interpreters are not readily available and screening time is at a premium.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Nishiwaki, E. Breeze, L. Smeeth, C. J. Bulpitt, R. Peters, and A. E. Fletcher Validity of the Clock-Drawing Test as a Screening Tool for Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2004; 160(8): 797 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]