Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Cited by other online articles
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Means, K. M.
Articles by Winger, R. M.

Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol 53, Issue 5 M331-M335, Copyright © 1998 by The Gerontological Society of America


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparison of a functional obstacle course with an index of clinical gait and balance and postural sway

KM Means, DE Rodell, PS O'Sullivan and RM Winger
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA. [email protected]

BACKGROUND: Older adults commonly experience falls because of balance and mobility problems. Better assessment methods are needed to understand and correct balance and mobility disorders. METHODS: We used a low technology, functional obstacle course (FOC) to measure balance and mobility in 352 community-dwelling elderly participants. To establish concurrent validity of the FOC, we compared performance on the FOC with two established measures of balance and mobility: performance on the Tinetti Index (TI) and postural sway area measured on a force platform. RESULTS: Bivariate correlation analyses revealed significant inverse correlations between FOC completion time, the TI balance and gait subscores, and the TI total score (r = -.73 to -.78). The FOC quality scores and TI balance and subscores gait and TI total scores (r = .76 to .82) were significantly positively correlated. FOC time had significant, but small, positive correlations with sway area with eyes open (r = .18) and closed (r = .17) and nonsignificant correlation with sway area with visual feedback. FOC quality also had significant, but smaller, inverse correlations with sway area with eyes open (r = -.024) and closed (r = -.015), and nonsignificant correlation with sway area with visual feedback. Regression analysis showed that TI gait and balance measures accounted for most of the variance found in FOC performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the position that the FOC and the TI measure dynamic balance, whereas postural sway measures a different aspect of balance. Advantages of the FOC include the evaluation of environmentally influenced falls and balance problems.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med SciHome page
M. Brown, D. R. Sinacore, E. F. Binder, and W. M. Kohrt
Physical and Performance Measures for the Identification of Mild to Moderate Frailty
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2000; 55(6): 350M - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 1998 by The Gerontological Society of America.