Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Cited by other online articles
Google Scholar
Articles by Carlson, B. M.
Articles by Faulkner, J. A.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Carlson, B. M.
Articles by Faulkner, J. A.

Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol 53, Issue 1 B52-B57, Copyright © 1998 by The Gerontological Society of America


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Muscle regeneration in young and old rats: effects of motor nerve transection with and without marcaine treatment

BM Carlson and JA Faulkner
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

We tested the hypothesis that after skeletal muscle regeneration in old compared with young rats damage to the motor nerve rather than damage to muscle fibers determines the magnitude of the deficits in muscle mass and maximum force (Po). The mass and Po of extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles of young (4 months) and old (24 months) male rats were compared two months following (i) Marcaine treatment plus simultaneous motor nerve transection, (ii) motor nerve transection alone, and (iii) Marcaine treatment alone (from data compiled previously). In both the nerve transection-only and Marcaine with nerve transection groups the recovery of mass and Po was significantly greater in young than in old rats. This is in contrast to our previous data showing that in the absence of nerve damage Marcaine-treated muscle in old rats regenerates as well as that in young rats. Our hypothesis was supported, and we conclude that impaired axonal regeneration, re-establishment of nerve-muscle contact, or both, is the critical component in the impaired regeneration of muscle grafts in old as compared with young rats.


This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)


Home page
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med SciHome page
B. M. Carlson, E. I. Dedkov, A. B. Borisov, and J. A. Faulkner
Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in Very Old Rats
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., April 1, 2001; 56(5): 224B - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. V. Chakravarthy, B. S. Davis, and F. W. Booth
IGF-I restores satellite cell proliferative potential in immobilized old skeletal muscle
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2000; 89(4): 1365 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. M. Roth, G. F. Martel, F. M. Ivey, J. T. Lemmer, B. L. Tracy, D. E. Hurlbut, E. J. Metter, B. F. Hurley, and M. A. Rogers
Ultrastructural muscle damage in young vs. older men after high-volume, heavy-resistance strength training
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 1999; 86(6): 1833 - 1840.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 1998 by The Gerontological Society of America.