Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Cited by other online articles
Google Scholar
Articles by Judge, J. O.
Articles by Wolfson, L. I.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Judge, J. O.
Articles by Wolfson, L. I.

Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol 50, Issue 5 M263-M270, Copyright © 1995 by The Gerontological Society of America


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Dynamic balance in older persons: effects of reduced visual and proprioceptive input

JO Judge, MB King, R Whipple, J Clive and LI Wolfson
Travelers Center on Aging, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the motor and sensory contributions to balance function in older persons is important in order to design effective interventions to prevent falls and loss of mobility. We tested the contributions of visual and proprioceptive input, muscle strength, and age to balance performance in 110 subjects free of clinical evidence of neurologic disease (mean age 80 years). METHODS: The EquiTest Sensory Organization Test was used to present sequential conditions that altered sensory input in a 2 (tactile/proprioceptive input) x 3 (visual input) design. Center of force and shear force data were recorded from the platform; the primary outcomes were loss of balance (LOB) and anterior-posterior center of force (COF) displacement as a proportion of foot length (COFD). RESULTS: Subjects had 3.5 +/- 2.7 LOB during testing. Reduction of vision input increased the odds ratio of a LOB 5.7 fold (3.9, 8.4, 95% CI) in unstable surface conditions, but adaptation with repeated trials was substantial. The adjusted odds ratio of a LOB was 0.65 and 0.45 in the second and third trials, respectively, compared to the first. Muscle strength and age were independent predictors of LOB. Gait velocity, single stance balance, and reported difficulty with ambulation, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living were also associated with LOB. CONCLUSIONS: Performance on clinical tests of strength, balance, and gait was associated with performance on a challenging balance test which reduced sensory input and effectiveness of motor responses. Adaptation to challenging balance conditions was substantial in this group of older subjects, but was diminished in the oldest subjects.


This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. M. Hausdorff, M. E. Nelson, D. Kaliton, J. E. Layne, M. J. Bernstein, A. Nuernberger, and M. A. F. Singh
Etiology and modification of gait instability in older adults: a randomized controlled trial of exercise
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2001; 90(6): 2117 - 2129.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 1995 by The Gerontological Society of America.