Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Helmes, E.
Articles by Pederson, L.

Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol 50, Issue 2 M91-M98, Copyright © 1995 by The Gerontological Society of America


JOURNAL ARTICLE

A questionnaire to evaluate disability in osteoporotic patients with vertebral compression fractures

E Helmes, A Hodsman, D Lazowski, A Bhardwaj, R Crilly, P Nichol, D Drost, L Vanderburgh and L Pederson
Department of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, St. Joseph's Health Centre, Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND. Few studies have reported on the functional disability due to vertebral compression factors in osteoporosis. The Osteoporosis Functional Disability Questionnaire (OFDQ) was developed to assess disability in patients with osteoporosis and back pain due to vertebral fractures. The domains of the OFDQ include: quantitative indices of pain, a standard 20-item depression scale, 26 items relating to functional abilities, a scale of social activities, and confidence in the ability of prescribed osteoporosis treatment to reverse disability. METHODS. Reliability of the OFDQ was assessed using test-retest and internal consistency methods. Criterion validity was demonstrated by correlating disability against radiographic evidence of vertebral fractures. Construct validity was demonstrated through comparisons of 81 patients with osteoporosis and fractures to 37 healthy age-matched controls. Additional evidence was found in comparing 45 of the 81 cases who were actively engaged in an exercise program with 36 cases who were sedentary. RESULTS. The test-retest reliabilities ranged from .76 to .93, with internal consistencies from .57 to .96. The OFDQ correlated significantly with relevant spinal pathology, and showed significant improvements in activities of daily living and socialization when active exercisers were compared to inactive patients with osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS. The OFDQ is a reliable instrument which correlates well with objective measures of osteoporotic spinal damage. It is also sensitive to changes in disability brought about by participation in our aerobic exercise program. The OFDQ may be a useful adjunct to measuring outcomes in other osteoporotic treatment protocols.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 1995 by The Gerontological Society of America.