HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 63:646-649 (2008)
© 2008 The Gerontological Society of America


BRIEF REPORT

Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Mortality in Older Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Longitudinal Study

Matteo Monami, Caterina Lamanna, Daniela Balzi, Francesca Bartalucci, Cecilia Melani, Giulio Masotti, Niccolò Marchionni and Edoardo Mannucci

1 Department of Critical Care Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Florence, Italy.
2 Epidemiology Unit, Local Health Unit 10, Florence, Italy.

Address correspondence to Edoardo Mannucci, MD, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Florence and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Via delle Oblate 4, 50134 Florence, Italy. E-mail: edoardo.mannucci{at}fastwebnet.it and mmonami{at}libero.it

Abstract

Background. Although age does not seem to modify the association of the metabolic syndrome (MS) with cardiovascular risk in middle-aged individuals, no comparison of risks associated with MS between old and middle-aged persons has been reported so far.

Methods. An observational study was performed on a consecutive series of 1716 type 2 diabetic outpatients (age range: 28–96 years). The diagnosis of MS was made following either the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATPIII) or the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria.

Results. The difference in cardiovascular mortality between patients with and without MS was significant up to the age of 70 years. After adjusting for age and sex, hazard ratios of MS for cardiovascular mortality were 3.03 (95% confidence interval, 1.45–6.29), 1.56 (0.91–2.68), and 1.17 (0.42–3.22) in patients ≤70, 71–80, and >80 years old, respectively.

Conclusions. MS is associated with increased cardiovascular risk in middle-aged type 2 diabetic patients, and the clinical utility of this category in older diabetic individuals is questionable.

Key Words: Diabetes mellitus • Advanced age • Cardiovascular mortality • Metabolic syndrome


METABOLIC syndrome (MS), which is the association of abdominal adiposity, hyperglycemia, reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, elevated triglyceride, and increased arterial blood pressure (1,2), is known to increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diabetic (3–10) as well as in nondiabetic (6,9–18) individuals.

The prevalence of MS increases progressively with age, up to approximately 70 years (12). In older persons, the prevalence of MS could actually be lower, as a possible effect of selective mortality. The predictive value of MS for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has been assessed in one study only (19). Although age does not seem to modify the association of MS with cardiovascular risk in middle-aged individuals (19), no comparison of risks associated with MS between old and middle-aged persons has been reported so far. The present analysis was aimed at assessing the effect of age on the association of MS with cardiovascular mortality in a cohort of type 2 diabetic patients in a wide age range.

METHODS

Patients and Baseline Assessment
An observational cohort study was performed on a consecutive series of 1716 outpatients (age range: 28–96 years), with an established diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, who were visited at the Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases Clinic of the Geriatric Unit of the University of Florence between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2003.

Demographic and clinical data were collected from clinical records and included a medical history with detailed information on duration of diabetes, any current pharmacological treatment, cardiovascular risk factors, and associated medical conditions. At first visit, patients underwent a physical examination that included measurement of body weight and height, waist circumference, and blood pressure following World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation (20). A standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded as well.

After an overnight fast, blood was sampled for determining HbA1c (high pressure liquid chromatography, Menarini Diagnostici, Italy; upper normal limit 6.2%) and creatinine, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride (all measured with an automated method Aeroset; Abbott Laboratories, Milan, Italy).

Diagnostic Criteria
Patients were considered hypertensive if they were on antihypertensive medication and/or if blood pressure was ≥140/90 mmHg (20). Renal failure was defined as serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL. Ischemic heart disease was diagnosed when patients reported previous myocardial infarction, angina (or when ECG showed unequivocal signs of current or previous infarction or ischemia according to the Minnesota coding system) (21). A history of stroke or transient ischemic attack was used to make the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease. Chronic comorbidity was assessed using the Charlson index (22). The diagnosis of MS was made following either the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATPIII) (1) or the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria (2). According to both sets of criteria, MS is present when at least three of five conditions (abdominal adiposity, hyperglycemia, reduced HDL cholesterol, elevated triglyceride, and increased arterial blood pressure) are satisfied, but IDF criteria established lower thresholds for abdominal adiposity and hyperglycemia, and considered elevated waist circumference as a mandatory condition for the diagnosis.

Follow-Up
Information on all-cause mortality and of causes of death up to December 31, 2005, was obtained by the City of Florence Registry Office, which contains complete and updated records of all persons living within city boundaries. For persons who had moved away, queries were sent to the Registry Office requesting the new city of residence. Following the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), cardiovascular causes of death were coded as 410–414 (ischemic heart disease), 420–429 (other heart diseases), or 798–799 (sudden death) for cardiac diseases, and as 430–434 or 436–438 for cerebrovascular disease. Codes 140–239 were used to identify cancer-related deaths.

Statistical Analysis
Normally distributed data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Unpaired Student's t test and Mann–Whitney U-test were used to compare continuous variables whenever appropriate. Chi-square test was used for between-group comparisons of categorical variables. Kaplan–Meier analysis of survival was performed with definition of hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and a stepwise Cox regression was carried out for multivariable analysis. The absence of variations over time of hazards associated with age or MS was checked to verify the proportionality of hazards assumed in the Cox models. All analyses were carried out with the SPSS 12.0.1 statistical package (Chicago, IL, USA), and p <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The characteristics of patients enrolled are summarized in Table 1. MS was present in 67.1% and 80.2% of patients using either NCEP-ATPIII or IDF criteria, respectively. During an average follow-up of 4.7 ± 2.1 years, 404 deaths were recorded, with a yearly rate of 4.2, 1.4, and 1.0 for all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer-related mortality, respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, MS defined with NCEP-ATPIII criteria was associated with a significant increase in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.36, 95% CI, 1.10–1.69 and 1.82, 95% CI, 1.24–2.68, respectively; both p <.001), but not in cancer-related mortality (HR 1.11, 95% CI, 0.72–1.70; p =.63). When chronic comorbidity and duration of diabetes were entered as covariates into the same Cox regression model, the association of NCEP-ATPIII–defined MS with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality retained its statistical significance (HR 1.23, 95% CI, 1.01–1.53, p =.048; and HR 1.69, 95% CI, 1.13–2.54, p =.011, respectively). Conversely, IDF-defined MS was not associated with increased mortality after first adjustment for age and sex (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Enrolled.

 
Using NCEP-ATPIII criteria, the prevalence of MS was significantly lower in patients ≥70 years old than in younger individuals (62.5% vs 69.3%; p =.005). Cardiovascular mortality as a function of age in patients stratified for MS status is reported in Figure 1. Cardiovascular mortality increased significantly with age (p for trend <.001 for groups with and without MS). The difference in cardiovascular mortality between patients with and without MS was statistically significant up to the age of 70 years. After adjusting for age and sex, HR values of MS for cardiovascular mortality were 3.03 (1.45–6.29), 1.56 (0.91–2.68), and 1.17 (0.42–3.22) (p =.003,.11, and.62) in patients ≤70, 71–80, and >80 years old, respectively. In an alternative model, after adjustment for age group (≤70, 71–80, and >80 years), sex, and MS, the interaction term Age group x MS was not significantly associated with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality (data not shown). Similar results were obtained when the two genders were examined separately (data not shown). Among patients ≤70, 71–80, and >80 years old, HRs of MS for all-cause mortality were 1.36 (0.98–1.90), 1.33 (0.99–1.83), and 1.27 (0.89–2.28), respectively.


Figure 01
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Yearly cardiovascular mortality rate for decades. CV = cardiovascular; HR = hazard ratio at multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age and sex. *p <.05; §Not calculable

 
DISCUSSION

The present study confirmed the negative impact of MS on cardiovascular risk in a homogeneous population of type 2 diabetic patients (3–10), with an effect possibly greater than that observed in nondiabetic individuals (9). NCEP-ATPIII criteria were superior to IDF criteria in identifying diabetic type 2 patients at increased cardiovascular risk (7).

Compared to middle-aged individuals, the predictive value of MS for cardiovascular mortality appeared to be reduced in persons older than 70 years. This phenomenon cannot be attributed to an inadequate sample size: Indeed, the absolute number of events observed was actually larger at older ages, and the distribution of patients between those with and without MS was more balanced in older than in younger participants, which are both factors potentially improving statistical power. A previous study of older diabetic women detected an increased cardiovascular mortality associated with MS (5). This discrepancy from our results might be due to different characteristics of the background population (North American vs Southern European), whereas our data do not support the hypothesis of gender differences in the predictive value of MS for cardiovascular mortality.

It could be speculated that individuals with greater genetic susceptibility to the effect of metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular disease have a lower life expectancy, and they could therefore be under-represented in the oldest decades. Furthermore, higher blood pressure levels in older persons without MS, in comparison with younger individuals without MS, could attenuate the independent effect of MS on cardiovascular risk in this age group. It also could be speculated that abdominal adiposity, which is one of the key components of MS, could have a smaller effect on cardiovascular morbidity in old, compared to younger persons (23). In fact, overweight and obesity are well-known risk factors for cardiovascular disease and cancer in young and middle-aged individuals; conversely, the ability to accumulate excess body fat could be a marker of adequate health status in older persons, for whom malnutrition can represent a more relevant threat. Furthermore, older individuals had, on average, lower abdominal adiposity than did younger individuals.

Conclusion
Although MS is associated with increased cardiovascular risk in middle-aged type 2 diabetic patients, the clinical utility of this category in older individuals is questionable.

Footnotes

Decision Editor: Luigi Ferrucci, MD, PhD

Received March 7, 2007

Accepted July 23, 2007

References

  1. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486-2497.[Free Full Text]
  2. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005;366:1059-1062.[Medline]
  3. Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit J, et al. Population-based incidence rates and risk factors for type 2 diabetes in white individuals: the Bruneck study. Diabetes. 2004;53:1782-1789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bruno G, Merletti F, Biggeri A, et al. Metabolic syndrome as a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes: the Casale Monferrato Study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2689-2694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hillier TA, Rizzo JH, Pedula KL, et al. Increased mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome in older women with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2258-2260.[Free Full Text]
  6. Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:683-689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Monami M, Marchionni N, Masotti G, Mannucci E. IDF and ATP-III definitions of metabolic syndrome in the prediction of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006;9:350-353.
  8. Monami M, Lambertucci L, Ungar A, et al. Is the third component of metabolic syndrome really predictive of outcome in type 2 diabetic patients? Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2515-2517.[Free Full Text]
  9. Langenberg C, Bergstrom J, Scheidt-Nave C, Pfeilschifter J, Barrett-Connor E. Cardiovascular death and the metabolic syndrome: role of adiposity-signaling hormones and inflammatory markers. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1363-1369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Juutilainen A, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Proteinuria and metabolic syndrome as predictors of cardiovascular death in non-diabetic and type 2 diabetic men and women. Diabetologia. 2006;49:56-65.[Medline]
  11. Dekker JM, Girman C, Rhodes T, et al. Metabolic syndrome and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in the Hoorn Study. Circulation. 2005;112:666-673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ford ES. The metabolic syndrome and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all-causes: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey II Mortality Study. Atherosclerosis. 2004;173:309-314.[Medline]
  13. Hunt KJ, Resendez RG, Williams K, Haffner SM, Stern MP. National Cholesterol Education Program versus World Health Organization metabolic syndrome in relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the San Antonio Heart Study. Circulation. 2004;110:1251-1257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, et al. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA. 2002;288:2709-2716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit J, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease in the metabolic syndrome: prospective data from the Bruneck study. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1251-1257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Girman CJ, Rhodes T, Mercuri M, et al. The metabolic syndrome and risk of major coronary events in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) and the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS). Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:136-141.[Medline]
  17. Kip KE, Marroquin OC, Kelley DE, et al. Clinical importance of obesity versus the metabolic syndrome in cardiovascular risk in women: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Circulation. 2004;109:706-713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hu G, Qiao Q, Tuomilehto J, Balkau B, Borch-Johnsen K, Pyorala K. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in nondiabetic European men and women. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1066-1076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Eberly LE, Prineas R, Cohen JD, et al. Metabolic syndrome: risk factor distribution and 18-year mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:123-130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Chalmers J, MacMahon S, Mancia G, et al. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension. Guidelines sub-committee of the World Health Organization. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1999;21:1009-1060.[Medline]
  21. Blackburn H. Classification of the electrocardiogram for population studies: Minnesota code. J Electrocardiol. 1969;2:305-310.[Medline]
  22. Charlson M, Szatrowski T, Peterson T, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245-1251.[Medline]
  23. Molarius A, Seidell JC, Visscher TL, Hofman A. Misclassification of high-risk older subjects using waist action levels established for young and middle-aged adults—results from the Rotterdam Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1638-1645.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation


HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS