HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 63:642-645 (2008)
© 2008 The Gerontological Society of America

Rising Incidence of Low-Trauma Fractures of the Calcaneus and Foot Among Finnish Older Adults

Pekka Kannus, Seppo Niemi, Mika Palvanen, Harri Sievänen, Jari Parkkari and Markku Järvinen

1 Injury & Osteoporosis Research Center, UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Finland.
2 Medical School, University of Tampere, and Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Trauma, Musculoskeletal Surgery and Rehabilitation, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.
3 Tampere Research Center of Sports Medicine, UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Finland.

Address correspondence to Professor Pekka Kannus, MD, PhD, UKK Institute, P.O. Box 30, FIN-33501 Tampere, Finland. E-mail: pekka.kannus{at}uta.fi


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background. Although various low-trauma fractures among older adults are said to be a major public health concern in contemporary societies with aging populations, reliable epidemiologic information on their secular trends is scarce.

Methods. We assessed the current trend in the number and incidence (per 100,000 persons) of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot of older adults in Finland, a European Union country with a well-defined white population of 5.2 million, by taking into account all persons 50 years old or older who were admitted to Finnish hospitals for primary treatment of such injury in 1970–2005.

Results. The number and raw incidence of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot among Finns 50 years old or older rose considerably between the years 1970 and 2005, from 64 (number) and 5.6 (incidence) in 1970 to 294 and 15.2 in 2005. For the study period, the age-adjusted incidence of fracture was higher in men than women and showed a clear increase in both sexes in 1970–2005, from 7.3 to 17.4 in men (138% increase), and from 4.3 to 12.5 in women (191% increase). A similar finding was observed in the age-specific incidences. Assuming that the observed increase in the age-specific fracture incidence continues in the 50-year-old or older group and the size of this population increases as predicted, the annual number of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot in this population will be two times higher in the year 2030 (approximately 550 fractures annually) than it was during 2001–2005.

Conclusions. In Finnish persons aged 50 years or older, the number of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot has risen considerably in 1970–2005 with a rate that cannot be explained merely by demographic changes. Further studies are needed to explore the exact reasons for the rise and possibilities for fracture prevention.

Key Words: Calcaneus and foot • Elderly adults • Epidemiology • Falls • Low-trauma fractures • Secular trends


LOW-TRAUMA fractures (often also called age-related fractures, mild-moderate energy fractures, fall-induced fractures, or osteoporotic fractures) in elderly people are a major public health burden in Finland and other developed countries that have aged populations (1–7). The most common forms of these fractures occur in the hip, spine, and distal radius (1,2,4,5). Nevertheless, a considerable number of low-trauma fractures also occur in the calcaneus, foot, ankle (distal tibia and fibula), knee, pelvis, and proximal humerus, and their treatment and rehabilitation are also demanding and expensive and require special attention (1,4,5,8–10).

Epidemiologic information on these latter fractures, however, is limited, and the literature provides no study investigating the number, incidence, and long-term secular trends of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot among older adults. Therefore, we assessed the time trends in the absolute number and age-adjusted and age-specific incidence rates of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot in the 50-year-old or older population in Finland between 1970 (4.61 million inhabitants, of which 1.14 million or 25% were 50 years old or older) and 2005 (5.25 million inhabitants, of which 1.93 million or 37% were 50 years old or older).


    METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Database for Fractures
The data of the low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot in Finland during 1970–2005 originated from the National Hospital Discharge Register (NHDR). This statutory, computer-based register is the oldest nationwide discharge register in the world (in operation since 1967), and provides reportedly reliable data for injuries and their causes in the Finnish population (i.e., annual coverage of injuries and accuracy of injury diagnoses are >90%) (3,8,11,12). The study program was approved by the register holder and an institutional review board.

The Finnish NHDR contains data on age, sex, place of residence, hospital number and department, place and cause of injury, diagnosis, day of admission and discharge, and place of further treatment. Injury diagnoses at discharge of the patient are based on all the available clinical and radiological information obtained from the patient during the hospital visit. Concerning the low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot, the final diagnosis is always based on both clinical and radiological information.

In accord with previous epidemiologic studies of low-trauma fractures (1–3,8), this epidemiologic study defined a low-trauma fracture of the calcaneus and foot as a fracture occurring in a person 50 years old or older as a consequence of low-energy trauma (a slip, trip, or fall from standing height or less with resulting ankle–foot contusion or distortion). Thus, all patients 50 years old or older who were admitted to hospitals in Finland for primary treatment of the first low-trauma fracture of the calcaneus or foot (toe fractures were not included) between 1970 and 2005 were selected from the NHDR. Fractures caused by vehicular crashes, falls from greater than standing height, or other high-energy traumas were excluded, as were cases with codes identifying sequalae of previous injuries or their orthopedic aftercare.

Fractures were recorded from the NHDR by evaluating both the primary and secondary diagnoses. The diagnoses were labeled with a 5-digit code according to the 8th, 9th, and 10th revisions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-8, ICD-9, ICD-10) that indicated the type of fracture. Between 1970 and 1986, the 8th revision of the ICD and its codes for calcaneus and foot fractures (82500, 82510, 82501, and 82511) were used. Between 1987 and 1995, the corresponding ICD-9 code classes were 8250A–8252F and 8253A–8253X, and between 1996 and 2005 the corresponding ICD-10 code classes were S92.0, S92.1, S92.2, and S92.3.

Database for the Population and Calculation of Fracture Incidence
Annual midyear populations were taken from the Official Statistics of Finland, the statutory, computer-based population register of the country (13). In this register, every Finn is registered by his or her personal identification number and the register is quality-controlled continuously and updated by Statistics Finland, the Central Statistical Office of Finland.

The gender-specific, age-adjusted fracture incidence (per 100,000 persons) was calculated with direct age standardization using the mean population of persons 50 years old or older between 1970 and 2005 as the standard population or reference point (a point for which each annual injury incidence was adjusted). In this way, the fracture rate estimates were amenable to comparison across study years and allowed estimation of the average annual individual risk for low-trauma fracture of the calcaneus and foot. The age-specific fracture incidences (per 100,000 persons) were calculated for three 10-year age groups (50–59, 60–69, and ≥70 years).

The fracture data were drawn from the entire population of Finland, the study thus completely covering the intended study population (Finnish nation). Thus, the absolute numbers and incidences of low-trauma fracture of the calcaneus and foot are reported for the complete Finnish population (rather than cohort-based estimates that require statistical analyses with confidence intervals) (2,3).

Prediction of Fractures Until the Year 2030
Finally, the aforementioned age-specific incidence rates of low-trauma fracture of the calcaneus and foot in 1970–2005 were used to predict the age-specific incidence rates in the years 2010, 2020, and 2030 by a linear regression model. Then, within each age and sex group, the predicted absolute number of fractures was obtained by multiplying the aforementioned incidence by the estimated number of inhabitants based on Finnish Population Projections 2006–2030 (14).


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Overall Number and Incidence of Low-Trauma Fractures of the Calcaneus and Foot
The number of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot among Finns aged 50 years or older rose considerably between the years 1970 and 2005, from 64 in 1970 to 294 in 2005. The relative increase was 359%. Following this, the raw incidence of fracture also showed a clear increase, from 5.6 in 1970 to 15.2 in 2005 (171%), despite the fact that the Finnish population 50 years old or older increased by 69% (from 1.14 million to 1.93 million) during the 36-year study period.

Age-Adjusted Incidence of Low-Trauma Fractures of the Calcaneus and Foot
Throughout the study period, the age-adjusted incidence of fracture was higher in men than women and showed a clear increase in both sexes from 1970 to 2005, from 7.3 to 17.4 in men (138% increase), and from 4.3 to 12.5 in women (191% increase).

Age-Specific Incidence of Low-Trauma Fractures of the Calcaneus and Foot
The age-specific incidence of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot also increased in all age groups of men and women during the study period (Figure 1). In men, the injury incidence rates in 1970 were 10.2, 5.3, and 4.7 in the age groups of 50–59, 60–69, and 70 years or older, respectively, versus 27.2, 9.9, and 8.2 in 2005. In women, these incidence rates were 5.6, 3.4, and 3.7 in 1970, versus 8.4, 9.4, and 21.7 in 2005.


Figure 01
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Age-specific incidence (per 100,000 persons) of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot in Finland in men and women 50 years old or older between 1970 and 2005, and prediction of the incidences until the year 2030, as calculated using a regression model

 
The above noted numbers and Figure 1 also reveal that, among men, the fracture incidence was highest in the youngest age group (men 50–59 years old), whereas among women the incidence was highest in the oldest age group (women 70 years old or older). In addition, the secular rise in fracture incidence was steepest in these age groups (Figure 1).

Low-Trauma Fractures of the Calcaneus and Foot in the Future
If trends in age-adjusted and age-specific fracture incidence continue at the same rate as were observed between 1970 and 2005, and the 50-year-old and older population increases as predicted (14), the number of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot in Finland will be twice as high by the year 2030 as was observed during 2001–2005.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Low-trauma fractures among older adults are a major public health concern in developed countries (1–7). Globally, more than 8 million such fractures occur annually and they form an important cause of pain, functional impairment, disability, and, indirectly, death among these people (1,3,5–7). Moreover, this major health problem is likely to increase, as the number and mean age of older people are increasing worldwide, and, as for many types of fractures, the age-adjusted incidence of fracture is also rising (2–4,7).

This nationwide epidemiologic study used the entire Finnish population 50 years old or older to describe the trends between 1970 and 2005 for the absolute number and incidence of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot. To our knowledge, no such study has been carried out previously, and thus our database and observations added entirely new information on the fracture epidemiology of elderly people. The study revealed that the incidence of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot was higher in men than women, and that overall number as well as age-adjusted and age-specific incidence of these fractures clearly rose from 1970 to 2005. Among men, the fracture incidence was highest and its secular rise steepest in the youngest age group (men 50–59 years old), whereas among women the same was true for the oldest age group (women 70 years old or older).

Our findings confirm previous observations from Finland and elsewhere that various fall-induced fractures and other injuries of older adults have been a rapidly growing problem in recent decades (2–7,15) and they suggest further that this undesirable trend has not stopped in the new millennium. It is also unfortunate that the further aging of the population is likely to increase the problem so that by the year 2030 Finland is likely to face more than 500 low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot among persons 50 years old or older each year. Many other developed countries are likely to face similar problems, although detailed epidemiologic data from other countries are largely lacking. Although the homogeneity of our Finnish white population limits the direct generalizability of the results to different and more diverse populations, we feel that our findings provide important and useful public health information for many other countries as well.

The precise reasons for the rise in the age-adjusted incidence of various low-trauma injuries in elderly persons are unknown (2–5,7). An increase in the average risk of slipping, tripping, and falling—caused by impaired muscle strength, balance, and reaction time—may partly explain the phenomenon. The decrease in these domains of musculoskeletal performance have been explained by such factors as poorer physical condition, less-active lifestyle with increased average body weight, poorer nutritional status (vitamin D and calcium), increased consumption of cigarettes and alcohol, greater occurrence of coexisting medical problems, and the increased use of balance-affecting drugs (3,4,7,16).

In this study of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot, the age groups for highest risk of fracture were quite different between women and men, and this may suggest gender-related differences in fracture mechanisms and contributing factors. Among women, a highest and most steeply rising injury incidence was seen in the oldest age group (Figure 1). This is a characteristic feature for many types of frailty-associated falls and low-trauma injuries of elderly people and thus a very important public health issue (1,2,4,5,8). Men, however, showed two rather atypical injury characteristics: men's age-adjusted fracture incidence was higher than that in women, and the fracture incidence was highest in the youngest group of men (Figure 1). Because the general incidence of falling is higher in elderly women than elderly men (3,4,6,7), it can be hypothesized that the younger groups of elderly men have an increased risk for severe, uncontrolled slips, trips, and falls than do their female counterparts. Further studies are, however, needed to confirm these findings and examine the exact reasons for this gender difference. In this respect, the influence of gender difference in alcohol usage, risk-taking behavior, or any other indicator of hazardous lifestyle will be of interest.

Conclusion
In Finnish persons aged 50 years or older, the number of low-trauma fractures of the calcaneus and foot has risen sharply in 1970–2005 with a rate that cannot be explained merely by demographic changes. Further studies are needed to explore the exact reasons for the rise and possibilities for fracture prevention.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study was funded by the Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland, and by the Juho Vainio Foundation, the Paulo Foundation, and the Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Helsinki, Finland.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Decision Editor: Luigi Ferrucci, MD, PhD

Received October 26, 2006

Accepted August 27, 2007


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jones G, Nguyen T, Sambrook PN, Kelly PJ, Gilbert C, Eisman JA. Symptomatic fracture incidence in elderly women and men: the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiologic study (DOES). Osteoporos Int. 1994;4:277-282.[Medline]
  2. Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Palvanen M, Vuori I, Järvinen M. Hip fractures in Finland between 1970–1997 and predictions for the future. Lancet. 1999;353:802-805.[Medline]
  3. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Koskinen S, et al. Fall-induced injuries and deaths among older adults. JAMA. 1999;281:1895-1899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, et al. Why is the age-standardized incidence of low-trauma fractures rising in many elderly populations? J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:1363-1367.[Medline]
  5. Cummings SR, Melton III LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002;359:1761-1767.[Medline]
  6. Tinetti ME. Preventing falls in elderly persons. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:42-49.[Free Full Text]
  7. Kannus P, Sievänen H, Palvanen M, Järvinen T, Parkkari J. Prevention of falls and consequent injuries in elderly people. Lancet. 2005;366:1885-1993.[Medline]
  8. Luthje P, Nurmi I, Kataja M, Heliövaara M, Santavirta S. Incidence of pelvic fractures in Finland in 1988. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:245-248.[Medline]
  9. Richter M, Wippermann B, Krettek C, Schratt HE, Hufner T, Therman H. Fractures and fracture dislocations of the midfoot: occurrence, causes and long-term results. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:392-398.[Medline]
  10. Hasselman CT, Vogt MT, Stone KL, Cauley JA, Conti SF. Foot and ankle fractures in elderly white women. Incidence and risk factors. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85-A:820-824.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Salmela R, Koistinen V. Coverage and accuracy of the Hospital Discharge Register (Finnish). Hospital. 1987;49:480-482.
  12. Keskimäki I, Aro S. Accuracy of data on diagnosis, procedures and accidents in the Finnish hospital discharge register. Int J Health Sci. 1991;2:15-21.
  13. Official Statistics of Finland. Structure of Population and Vital Statistics: Whole Country and Provinces, 1970–2005. Helsinki, Finland: Statistics Finland; 2006.
  14. Official Statistics of Finland. Population Projections by Municipalities 2006-2030. Helsinki, Finland: Statistics Finland; 2006.
  15. Gillespie L. Editorial. Preventing falls in elderly people. BMJ. 2004;328:653-654.[Free Full Text]
  16. Aromaa A, Koskinen S, eds. Health and Functional Capacity in Finland. Publications of the National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland 2004.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation


HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS