| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine, 2 Psychogeriatric Unit, and 3 NeuroBioGenLab–Memory Clinic, IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio–Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
4 AFaR, Associazione Fatebenefratelli per la Ricerca, Rome, Italy.
5 Institute of Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Brescia, Italy.
6 Service of Neuroradiology, Istituto Clinico Città di Brescia, Italy.
Address correspondence to Giovanni B. Frisoni, MD, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio–Fatebenefratelli, National Centre for Research and Care of Alzheimer's and Mental Diseases, via Pilastroni 4, 25125 Brescia, Italy. E-mail: gfrisoni{at}fatebenefratelli.it
|
A |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. In 63 MCI patients 65 years old or older, BP was measured both clinically and with ambulatory BP monitoring. Patients were classified in two groups: no/very mild (n = 34) and mild to severe (n = 29) WMLs, based on a visual scale on magnetic resonance (mean age 71.8 ± 4.7 vs 74.6 ± 5.1, and female gender 53% vs 66%, respectively). The volume of WMLs was measured by a semi-automatic method, separately for periventricular caps and rim, periventricular confluent, subcortical punctate, and subcortical confluent. Polymorphisms of cystatin C (CST3) and cholesterol 24-hydroxylase (CYP46) genes, putative risk factors for cerebrovascular disease, were determined.
Results. The prevalence of cerebrovascular risk factors was similar in the two MCI groups of different WML severity, as well as clinic and ambulatory BP. In patients with mild to severe, but not in those with no/very mild WMLs, the volume of periventricular confluent WMLs increased with increasing daytime systolic BP (regression coefficient.47, 95% confidence interval [CI],.13 to.71 vs.02, 95% CI, –.32 to.36, p =.003 for the difference between slopes). The volume of other WML subtypes was not associated with ambulatory BP. Participants carrying both CST3*B and CYP46*T alleles were overrepresented in the MCI group with mild to severe WMLs (43% vs 17%, p.03).
Conclusions. BP and gene putative risk factors for cerebrovascular disease are differentially associated with WMLs in two MCI groups of different WML severity. WMLs might develop for the convergence of innate with acquired factors.
Key Words: Blood pressure White matter lesions Mild cognitive impairment Genotype Cystatin c
A large body of evidence has shown that vascular risk factors, especially elevated blood pressure (BP), is associated with the development of WMLs (4–6). In hypertensive patients, some factors seem to be associated with the presence of WMLs, such as the duration (7) and severity (8) of hypertension. In addition, studies on ambulatory BP monitoring evidenced the contribution of BP variability to cerebrovascular damage (9–11). In particular, steady and pulsatile components of daytime, nighttime, and 24-hour BP have gained interest in the prediction of WMLs (12).
However, not all hypertensive persons develop WMLs, as suggested by clinical observations of elderly patients with a long history of hypertension, sometimes badly treated, who have only few or no WMLs. It is reasonable to hypothesize that other factors, such as genetic background, might facilitate the expression of WMLs, as suggested by genetic disorders leading to severe WMLs in the absence of vascular risk factors (13,14) and by a twin study finding that WMLs are highly heritable (15).
Previous studies point to some genes as potential candidates for WMLs. The apoE e4 allele, the strongest risk factor for AD, has been inconsistently found to be associated with WMLs (16–19). The cystatin C (CST3) gene encodes a protein implicated in the repair processes of the nervous system (20). Moreover, it has been found associated with amyloid deposits in cerebral amyloid angiopathy (21), a condition in which WMLs develop due to intimal thickening of the small vessels and ischemia of the surrounding white matter (22). The cholesterol 24-hydroxylase (CYP46) gene expresses a brain-specific enzyme involved in cholesterol metabolism and has been associated with brain amyloid load in AD (23). This literature suggests that genes might predispose to microvascular damage by either increasing amyloid deposition in cerebral blood vessels or influencing brain response to vascular damage.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of ambulatory BP and candidate genes for microvascular damage with WMLs in MCI patients. BP will be measured with 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, daytime and nighttime BP will be studied separately, and pulse pressure will also be addressed. The genetic predisposition to develop WMLs will be assessed through polymorphisms of CST3, CYP46, and apoE genes. MCI patients rather than cognitively normal elders will be studied as the higher prevalence of WMLs in the former group may improve the power to detect an association with BP.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inclusion criteria in the study were all of the following: (i) complaint by the patient or report by a relative or the general practitioner of memory or other cognitive disturbances; (ii) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (24) score of 24–27 or MMSE of
28 with low performance on the clock drawing test (25) (score of 2/6 or lower); (iii) preservation of instrumental and basic activities of daily living. More details have been published elsewhere (26). Patients with history or neurological signs of major stroke have been excluded. From April 2002 through March 2005, 138 patients were enrolled, and we selected for the present study those 100 older than 65 years. Of these, 37 were excluded due to invalid ambulatory BP measurements (n = 7) or logistic problems or refusal to perform the exam (n = 30). Finally, 63 MCI patients were included.
We divided the whole sample into two groups of different WML severity based on an exploratory analysis of the relationship between BP and WMLs assessed with a validated visual rating scale (see MR Imaging, Visual Assessment). The analysis suggested a peculiar phenotype in which a sizeable subgroup (12 of 34, i.e., 35% of patients) had no or very mild WMLs even with high daytime systolic BP values (>135 mmHg). This observation was confirmed in the analysis of WML volumes, where a subgroup of patients had very low total and periventricular WML volumes even with extreme BP values. This observation encouraged us to isolate the group of patients with minimal or no WMLs to study possible differential associations of BP variables and genetic background with WML severity.
Clinical Assessment
We assessed vascular diseases and risk factors such as hypertension, heart diseases, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Hypertension was defined as high values of 24-hour mean BP (systolic
135 or diastolic
85) (27) or antihypertensive therapy. Heart diseases were defined as previous diagnosis and current treatment for coronary artery disease, primary arrhythmias, or heart failure. Cardiovascular medications were recorded and coded according to the Anatomic, Therapeutic, and Chemical (ATC) classification system (C01–C08) (28). Diabetes and hyperlipidemia were defined as previous diagnosis and current treatment. Duration of hypertension and diabetes was computed since the time of first diagnosis.
Nonvascular physical diseases were ascertained through history and clinical and instrumental exams. The number of nonvascular physical diseases was computed as the sum of the following: peripheral venous, respiratory, hepatobiliary, renal, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and autoimmune diseases and malignancies.
BP Measurement
Clinic BP measurement was obtained with the participant seated after at least 2 minutes of rest using a traditional sphygmomanometer from three consecutive measurements on both arms. The highest of the six measurements was defined as clinic BP.
Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed with an automatic portable device (Schiller BR-102; Schiller AG, Baar, Switzerland). Measurements were obtained with an adult-size cuff place around the nondominant arm, unless a right–left difference of systolic BP
10 mmHg was detected, in which case the cuff was placed around the arm with the higher measurement. The measurements were made at fixed intervals of 20 minutes during daytime and nighttime. Data were considered to be adequate for analysis if at least 70% of the 72 readings over the 24 hours were valid (29). The 24 hours were divided into day and night based on patients' activity diaries. Daytime and nighttime BPs were the average of the valid daytime and nighttime measurements. Pulse pressure was the average of the differences between 24-hour systolic and diastolic values at each time point.
MR Imaging
MR images were acquired at the Service of Neuroradiology, Istituto Clinico Città di Brescia, Brescia, using a 1.0 Tesla Philips Gyroscan (Philips Medical Systems, Milan, Italy). Axial T2-weighted, proton density, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and gradient echo 3D images (TR 20 ms, TE 5 ms, flip angle 30°, field of view 220 mm, acquisition matrix 256 x 256, slice thickness 1.3 mm) were acquired.
Visual Assessment
WMLs were assessed using the rating scale for age-related white matter changes (ARWMC) (30) on T2-weighted and FLAIR MR images. WMLs were rated separately in frontal, parieto-occipital, temporal, infratentorial areas and in basal ganglia on a 4-point scale. The total score is the sum of subscores for each area (score range 0–3) in the left and right hemisphere, ranging from 0 to 30.
MCI Groups of Different WML Severity
WMLs were considered as mild to severe when the ARWMC scale total score was 4 or more, or when beginning confluence of lesions (subscore 2) was observed in at least one area. Otherwise, WMLs were considered absent or very mild. Based on this criterion, patients were divided into 34 with no/very mild WMLs and 29 with mild to severe WMLs. WML volume was computed with an in-home semiautomatic software. A description of images preprocessing, tracing, and volume computation is available at http://www.centroalzheimer.it/public/additional_WMLvol.doc. WMLs were classified based on localization and morphology, allowing differentiation of four subtypes of WMLs: (i) periventricular caps and rim were symmetrical and regular caps around the horns of the lateral ventricles and continuous lining surrounding the wall of lateral ventricles (Figure 1a); (ii) periventricular confluent were WMLs connected to the periventricular caps and rim but extending into deep white matter with irregular shape (Figure 1a); (iii) subcortical punctate were small (
5 mm) focal WMLS with regular shape located in deep white matter (Figure 1b); (iv) subcortical confluent were large and irregular WMLs arising from confluence of multiple lesions located in the deep white matter not adjacent to lateral ventricles (Figure 1b).
|
Genetic Analyses
Blood samples were available in 32 patients with no/very mild and 28 with mild to severe WMLs. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole-blood samples according to standard procedures, and apoE genotyping was carried out by PCR amplification and HhaI restriction enzyme digestion. The genotype was resolved on 4% Metaphor Gel (BioSpa, Milan, Italy) and visualized by ethidium bromide staining (31). The DNA was analyzed for CST3 and CYP46 polymorphisms as previously described (32,23). Two CST3 analyses were missing because genotyping did not work.
Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Sociodemographic, clinical, and genetic differences between the two MCI groups of different WML severity were assessed with t test for continuous and with chi-square for categorical variables. The association between WML volume and BP variables was assessed with multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, TIV, and brain volume. Generalized linear models (analysis of covariance [ANCOVA]) were built regressing each BP variable on WMLs to assess the significance of the difference between the regression coefficients of the two MCI groups of WML severity. Age, TIV, and brain volume were included as covariates.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Findings of the association between daytime systolic BP and WML severity and of different distribution of CST3 B and CYP46 T polymorphisms in MCI groups with different WML load led us to speculate that this particular genetic profile might carry an increased susceptibility to the detrimental effects of BP on small vessels. Several observations suggested that CST3 can exert a protective role on neurons: Different brain injuries, including ischemia, axotomy, surgery, and epilepsy, led CST3 expression levels to increase, both in activated glial cells and in neurons. We previously demonstrated that, in humans, the CST3 B allele was associated with reduced secretion of CST3 (33) and abnormal cortical rhythms in dementia and MCI (20). The CYP46 T polymorphism was associated with increased cerebral β-amyloid load and cerebrospinal fluid levels of β-amyloid peptides and phosphorylated
protein, as well as increased risk of AD in nondemented elderly persons (23), indicating a detrimental effect on the brain possibly mediated by β-amyloid. Our findings might suggest a synergistic interaction of CST3 and CYP46. We hypothesize that decreased production of CST3 together with increased amyloid production might result in an increased susceptibility to vascular damage.
The differential association of daytime systolic BP with WML subtypes deserves comment. There is much debate in the literature on the pathophysiology of WMLs. Some histological data (34) and clinical studies (35) have suggested that caps and rim lesions were caused by minor pathological changes of nonischemic origin and some punctate WMLs may even correspond to no detectable change on pathology (34,36). On the contrary, confluent WMLs seemed to have almost invariably a microvascular ischemic origin (37). The present data supported the view that the pathophysiology of periventricular confluent was different from that of caps and rim and punctate lesions. Subcortical confluent WMLs showed a trend toward the association of BP with mild to severe WMLs, being significant only in the differential association between the two groups of WML severity.
This study has some methodological limitations. First, the significant associations of this study cannot be taken to point to causal relationships due to the cross-sectional nature of the study and its design, which does not directly address the pathophysiological pathway leading from genes to BP to WMLs. Second, the small sample size prevented us from adjusting analyses for potential confounders such as hypertension, which was slightly more prevalent in the MCI with mild to severe WMLs. Third, uncontrolled hypertension-related variables such as dipping (38) and BP variability (39), and other vascular risk factors such as plasma homocysteine levels and inflammatory markers (40,41) might be associated with WMLs. Fourth, the clinical setting where the study was carried out prevented generalizability before the results were replicated in a large population-based sample of older persons. Last, we measured WMLs on conventional T2-weighted and FLAIR MR scans, which are known to capture only part of the phenotypic expression of WMLs. Novel MR techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging, sensitive to microstructural changes of white matter axons invisible to traditional imaging, might provide greater insight into the pathophysiology of WMLs (42).
Conclusion
Our study identified two MCI groups of different WML load in which BP was differentially associated with WMLs. The different distribution of genes possibly involved in microvascular damage might underlie this differential association. Further studies in larger samples of patients are warranted to confirm these results.
|
A |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
F |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received February 7, 2007
Accepted August 16, 2007
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|