HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 62:1352-1356 (2007)
© 2007 The Gerontological Society of America

Neurotoxic Effects of Repetitive Inhibition of Oxidative Phosphorylation in Young Adults Surfacing With Deficits of Spatial Learning in Old Age

Peter Lohmann and Matthias W. Riepe

Department of Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.

Address correspondence to Matthias W. Riepe, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Medical University, Eschenallee 3, 14050 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: matthias.riepe{at}charite.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Little is known about whether events in youth impact performance in old age. We examined spatial navigation in young (4.5 months) and middle-aged (9 months) CD-1 mice in a complex maze after treatment with 3-nitropropionate (3-np; 20 mg/kg body weight; 9 injections intraperitoneally [i.p.] every other day). Young mice treated with 3-np were examined in a mirror version of this maze in old age (22 months) and with a nonreference memory task of an eight-arm radial maze. The performance of young mice was affected to a small degree by treatment with 3-np. However, the performance of middle-aged mice severely declined on 3-np treatment. Animals treated at a young age with 3-np showed learning deficits in old age for both the complex maze and the radial maze. We conclude that exposure to repetitive inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation in youth leads to impairment of spatial learning surfacing in old age.


Mazes have been used to study learning in rodents since the turn of the last century (1,2). Animal research, as well as the study of normal individuals and patients with brain lesions, have demonstrated the crucial roles of the hippocampus and the hippocampal formation for the cognitive representation of space and navigation (3–11). In addition, the parietal lobes and prefrontal areas have been shown to be active in complex navigational tasks (11–13). Age-related deficits of spatial memory and nonspatial tasks have been demonstrated repeatedly (14–20). Middle-aged rats with hippocampal lesions show impairment when completing spatial tasks but normal performance on nonspatial tasks, whereas both rats with hippocampal lesions and sham-operated old rats show impaired performance on both spatial and nonspatial tasks (21).

In recent years, neurodegenerative diseases have been linked to an impairment of mitochondrial energy metabolism (22,23). However, mild impairment of energy metabolism can actually be protective (24). Depending on the dosage and application interval, 3-nitropropionate (3-np), an inhibitor of mitochondrial complex II, can cause either neuroprotection or neurodegeneration in the hippocampus (25–27).

It has been established that prenatal and neonatal events may have an impact on the development of cognitive abilities and lead to cognitive impairment in adulthood (28). Recently, we showed that inhibition of maternal energy metabolism by treatment with 3-np prior to conception may become obvious in the adult offspring (29). It was the goal of the present study to assess long-term effects of repetitive inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation on spatial learning in young and middle-aged female CD-1 mice and to investigate whether treatment of young adult animals bears long-term effects on spatial learning in old age.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Four groups of female CD-1 mice (Charles River Laboratories, Sulzfeld, Germany) at three different ages (i.e., young [4.5 months], middle aged [9 months], and old [22 months]) were used. Five animals were housed in a cage under controlled conditions of temperature (22 ± 2°C) and humidity (55 ± 5%) and were kept on a 12-hour light/dark cycle, with water available ad libitum. Three days before testing, animals were deprived of food so that their body weight attained 90%–85% of initial weight before fasting. Food deprivation was maintained during the whole experimental period. In part, animals were treated with 3-np at 20 mg/kg body weight (see "Treatment Groups" and Table 1). Previously it was shown that short time intervals between injections of 3-np induce neuronal dysfunction (27,30). In these and other following studies animals received intraperitoneally 3-np at 20 mg/kg body weight every other day for a total of 18 days of treatment. Treating female animals with such a dosage regimen induces neuronal impairment even in their offspring (31). Following up on this study and considering the importance of studies on female rodents given the higher life expectancy in female humans, we used female animals for the present study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Experimental Design and Animal Groups.

 
Mazes
We used a complex maze with several crossings, t crossings, blind alleys, a goal zone described elsewhere (29,31,32), and an identical but mirror-inverted complex maze (hereafter referred to as the "m-complex maze"). The mazes were made of rigid gray polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and were surrounded by a gray curtain with geometric cues (triangle, circle, rhombus, and square) at four cardinal points (see Figure 1).


Figure 01
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Top view of complex maze with curtain and geometrical cues

 
Furthermore, we used a nonspatial memory task of an eight-arm radial maze. To control for extraneous spatial cues, the maze was surrounded by a gray curtain.

Treatment Groups
An overview of treatment groups is shown in Table 1. Group G1 animals were sham-treated with nine intraperitoneal injections of NaCl and performed the complex maze task at the age of 4.5 months. Group G2 was treated with nine injections of 3-np at the age of 4.5 months. One day after the last injection, the mice performed the complex maze task and were trained for 8 (consecutive) days in the complex maze (G2A). At the age of 22 months, these animals performed the m-complex maze task as well as the radial maze task (G2B). Group G3 mice were sham-treated at the age of 9 months with nine injections of NaCl. One day after the last injection they performed the complex maze task (G3A) and were trained for 8 days in the complex maze. At the age of 22 months, this same group performed both the m-complex maze task and the radial maze task (G3B). Group G4 mice were treated with nine intraperitoneal injections of 3-np at the age of 9 months and performed the complex maze task.

Behavioral Testing
In young and middle-aged animals, behavioral testing took place 1 day after the last intraperitoneal injection with 3-np and NaCl, respectively. In the complex and m-complex maze, animals were rewarded with a food pellet in the goal zone. They were trained five times a day for 8 consecutive days and were given a maximum time limit of 300 seconds to find the exit, as previously reported (31).

In the eight-arm radial maze, a food pellet was offered in a bowl at the end of each arm. Animals were tested three times a day until they had visited all arms and consumed the food pellet in each arm, or for a maximum time of 300 seconds per trial. A mouse entering the same arm more than once was coded as an error.

Experiments were recorded by a tracking system (Multitrack; AccuScan Instruments, Inc., Columbus, OH).

Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed by using a Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Bonferroni t or Dunn's test (when normality tests failed). Statistical significance was set at p <.05.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Treatment of Young and Middle-Aged Animals
The time for sham-treated 4.5-month-old animals (G1; n = 10) to reach the goal zone declined from 108.8 ± 9.2 seconds (mean and standard error) on the first day to 32.0 ± 16.0 seconds on day 8 (p <.01 to first day to onset) and from 140.4 ± 15.0 seconds to 26.9 ± 4.4 seconds (p <.01 to first day ) in 9-month-old sham-treated mice (G3A; n = 10) (Figure 2). A day to day comparison of the groups shows significant differences from day 1 to day 3 (day 1: p <.05, day 2: p <.01, day 3: p <.02) and on day 7 (p <.02) favoring the younger animals.


Figure 02
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Average time that young and middle-aged female groups needed to perform the complex maze (from day 1 to day 8; mean and standard error). For group assignment, see Table 1. 3-np = 3-nitropropionate

 
In 4.5-month-old 3-np-treated animals (G2A; n = 10), the time to reach the goal zone declined from 153.1 ± 15.5 seconds on day 1 to 36.8 ± 4.9 seconds on day 8 (p <.01 to first day). In contrast, 9-month-old 3-np-treated animals (G4; n = 9) were strongly impaired by the treatment, and the time to reach the goal zone remained unchanged despite training (191.1 ± 22.1 seconds on the day 1 vs 143.7 ± 30.4 seconds on day 8; p =.23). Between these groups (G2A vs. G4), time to reach the goal zone differed significantly from the second to the eighth day (p <.01). Compared to the age-matched 3-np-treated group (G2A), there was a significantly better running time of the sham-treated group (G1) on day 1 (p <.02), 2 (p <.01), 5 (p <.05), and 7 (p <.01).

Regarding the comparison of running times between 9-month-old 3-np-treated groups G4 versus G3A (same age, sham-treated) and G2A, there are highly significant differences on all days, except on the first day of training. From the second day forward, running times in group G4 were lower over the complete experimental period (p <.01 from second day to the last day).

M-Complex Maze Versus Radial Maze in Old Mice
Having reached an advanced age of 22 months, groups G3B and G2B had to perform the m-complex maze task and the eight-arm radial maze task as described above. They had already performed the original complex maze task at the age of 9 and 4.5 months, respectively. Attrition over time led to the reduction from 10 to 8 mice in the old age group G3B and a reduction from 10 to 6 mice in group G2B.

The average running time on the first and last days in the m-complex maze was 121.4 ± 19.0 seconds and 85.2 ± 38.7 seconds (p =.42) in G2B and 115.5 ± 27.4 seconds and 65.8 ± 10.7 seconds (p =.11) in G3B animals, respectively. Neither group improved their running time to reach the goal zone of the maze over the experimental period examined.

A comparison of running time over all 40 trials showed a significant difference between these groups. Both the time needed to escape from the m-complex maze (Figure 3A, p <.01) as well as length of the path taken (Figure 3B, p <.01) favored sham-treated G3B over 3-np-treated G2B animals. In contrast to the failure to learn the m-complex maze over the experimental period, both groups significantly improved on the radial maze task in terms of the average running time to visit all eight arms (Figure 4A) as well as a reduction in the number of errors made (Figure 4B).


Figure 03
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. A, Average time that 22-month-old female groups needed to perform the m-complex maze over the whole experimental period (white bar: animals sham-treated at a young age [G3B, Table 1]; hatched bar: animals treated with 3-nitropropionate.[3-np] at a young age [G2B, Table 1]). B, Average distance that old female groups need to reach the goal zone of the m-complex maze (white bar: animals sham-treated at a young age [G3B, Table 1]; hatched bar: animals treated with 3-np at a young age [G2B, Table 1]). Shown are mean and standard error of 40 trials (***p <.01)

 

Figure 04
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. A, Average time that 22-month-old female groups needed to perform the eight-arm radial maze on days 1 and 8. Both groups improved significantly from first to eighth day (dotted bar: animals sham-treated at a young age [G3B, Table 1]; black bar: animals treated with 3-nitropropionate [3-np] at a young age [G2B, Table 1]). B, Average amount of errors old female groups made in the eight-arm radial maze on days 1 and 8. Both groups improved significantly from first to eighth day (dotted bar: animals sham-treated at a young age [G3B, Table 1]; black bar: animals treated with 3-np at a young age [G2B, Table 1]). Shown are mean and standard error (***p <.01)

 
A comparison of group G3B (sham-treated at middle age) and G2B (3-np-treated at young age) results in the radial maze showed better performance of group G3B. Regarding all trials of the radial maze task, animals in group G3B needed an average time of 181.7 ± 10.4 seconds, and animals in group G2B needed 237.7 ± 8.6 seconds to visit all eight arms and consume the food pellets (p <.01; Figure 5A). Group G2B lingered in the middle area of the radial maze for longer period than did the other groups (G3B: 22.0 ± 1.8 seconds, G2B: 38.9 ± 2.3 seconds, p <.01; Figure 5B). Group G2B was also more prone to make errors (10.6 ± 1.1 vs 8.2 ± 0.8 for group G3B, mean and standard errors; p =.08).


Figure 05
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. A, Average time that 22-month-old female groups needed to perform the radial maze (white bar: animals sham-treated at a young age [G3B, Table 1]; hatched bar: animals treated with 3-nitropropionate [3-np] at a young age [G2B, Table 1]). B, Average time animals in 22-month-old female groups G3 and G2 spent in the middle of the radial maze (white bar: animals sham-treated at a young age [G3B, Table 1]; hatched bar: animals treated with 3-np at a young age [G2B, Table 1]). Shown are mean and standard error of 24 trials; ***p <.01)

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Young and Middle-Aged Animals in a Complex Maze
In this study we investigated whether young and middle-aged CD-1 mice are impaired in a spatial version of a complex maze after repetitive treatment with 3-np. Similar to other reports (16,33), young sham-treated animals performed slightly better than 3-np-treated young animals. In contrast, 3-np-treated 9-month-old mice were severely affected by repetitive treatment with 3-np compared to age-matched sham-treated animals, and they did not improve their running time over the course of the experiment. Comparing groups treated with 3-np in young and in middle age demonstrates that 3-np treatment is more toxic to middle-aged than young animals. This finding suggests that, in a functionally relevant fashion, the hippocampus is impaired by 3-np treatment in an age-dependent fashion. The finding also conforms with previous demonstrations that the integrity of hippocampal function is mandatory for mouse spatial orientation in water mazes (34 – 37) as well as in the complex maze used in this study (29,31,32). Regarding escape time, sham-treated 9-month-old mice and 3-np-treated 4.5-month-old mice performed equally, which suggests a similarity between repetitive inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation and natural aging in terms of spatial learning impairments (38–40).

Old Mice in the M-Complex and Eight-Arm Radial Mazes
Compared to the quick learning of the complex maze in animals at 4.5 and 9 months, learning was impaired in advanced age in the m-complex maze. No learning success was observed over the experimental period of 8 days. However, an overall comparison of time and path length to escape from the maze showed significantly worse performance for animals treated with 3-np at the age of 4.5 months. Thus, although only minor immediate impairment of maze learning occurs by repetitive inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation with 3-np treatment, a more severe learning deficit surfaces in older age later on. Thus, 3-np may advance aging via mitochondrial oxidative damage leading to neuronal degeneration (41–43). One argument supporting this hypothesis is that the protein microenvironment of mitochondrial enzymes is altered even in the offspring of animals repetitively treated with 3-np (27). Alternatively, or perhaps in addition, repetitive treatment with 3-np may alter the regulation of neurotrophins (31).

In our nonspatial version of an eight-arm radial maze, both groups improved performance significantly over the experimental period. However, animals repetitively treated with 3-np at the age of 4.5 months showed significantly poorer performance in this task. Nonspatial tasks are regarded as hippocampus-independent (8,44), thus impairment may result from impairment induced by 3-np in other brain regions such as the striatum (45–47).

Summary
We conclude that, although only minor learning deficits resulting from repetitive inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation with 3-np at a young age appear immediately, severe learning deficits in these mice surface in old age.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (M. W. R.).


    Footnotes
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Decision Editor: Huber R. Warner, PhD

Received February 8, 2007

Accepted July 19, 2007


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Small WS. An experimental study of the mental process of the rat. Am J Psychology. 1900;11:135-165.
  2. Lashley KS, Franz SI. The effects of cerebral destruction upon habit-formation and retention in the albino rat. Psychobiology. 1912;1:71-139.
  3. Milner B. Visually-guided maze learning in man: effects of bilateral hippocampal, bilateral frontal, and unilateral cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia. 1965;3:317-338.
  4. Pigott S, Milner B. Memory for different aspects of complex visual scenes after unilateral temporal- or frontal-lobe resection. Neuropsychologia. 1993;31:1-15.[Medline]
  5. Olton DS, Samuelson RJ. Remembrance of places passed: spatial memory in rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1976;2:97-116.
  6. Nunn JA, Graydon FJ, Polkey CE, Morris RG. Differential spatial memory impairment after right temporal lobectomy demonstrated using temporal titration. Brain. 1999;122:(Pt 1): 47-59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Wood ER, Dudchenko PA, Eichenbaum H. The global record of memory in hippocampal neuronal activity. Nature. 1999;397:613-616.[Medline]
  8. Jarrard LE. On the role of the hippocampus in learning and memory in the rat. Behav Neural Biol. 1993;60:9-26.[Medline]
  9. Crandall J, Sakai Y, Zhang J, et al. 13-Cis-retinoic acid suppresses hippocampal cell division and hippocampal-dependent learning in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:5111-5116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Knierim JJ, Kudrimoti HS, McNaughton BL. Place cells, head direction cells, and the learning of landmark stability. J Neurosci. 1995;15:(3 Pt 1): 1648-1659.[Abstract]
  11. Gron G, Wunderlich AP, Spitzer M, Tomczak R, Riepe MW. Brain activation during human navigation: gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:404-408.[Medline]
  12. Goldman-Rakic PS. Cellular basis of working memory. Neuron. 1995;14:477-485.[Medline]
  13. Salmon E, Van der Linden M, Collette F, et al. Regional brain activity during working memory tasks. Brain. 1996;119:(Pt 5): 1617-1625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Barnes CA. Memory deficits associated with senescence: a neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1979;93:74-104.[Medline]
  15. Fischer W, Chen KS, Gage FH, Bjorklund A. Progressive decline in spatial learning and integrity of forebrain cholinergic neurons in rats during aging. Neurobiol Aging. 1992;13:9-23.[Medline]
  16. Frick KM, Baxter MG, Markowska AL, Olton DS, Price DL. Age-related spatial reference and working memory deficits assessed in the water maze. Neurobiol Aging. 1995;16:149-160.[Medline]
  17. Gallagher M, Pelleymounter MA. Spatial learning deficits in old rats: a model for memory decline in the aged. Neurobiol Aging. 1988;9:549-556.[Medline]
  18. Hersi AI, Rowe W, Gaudreau P, Quirion R. Dopamine D1 receptor ligands modulate cognitive performance and hippocampal acetylcholine release in memory-impaired aged rats. Neuroscience. 1995;69:1067-1074.[Medline]
  19. Perlmutter M, Metzger R, Nezworski T, Miller K. Spatial and temporal memory in 20 to 60 year olds. J Gerontol. 1981;36:59-65.
  20. Uttl B, Graf P. Episodic spatial memory in adulthood. Psychol Aging. 1993;8:257-273.[Medline]
  21. Stoelzel CR, Stavnezer AJ, Denenberg VH, Ward M, Markus EJ. The effects of aging and dorsal hippocampal lesions: performance on spatial and nonspatial comparable versions of the water maze. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002;78:217-233.[Medline]
  22. Beal MF, Hyman BT, Koroshetz W. Do defects in mitochondrial energy metabolism underlie the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases? Trends Neurosci. 1993;16:125-131.[Medline]
  23. Parker WD, Jr. Cytochrome oxidase deficiency in Alzheimer's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;640:59-64.[Medline]
  24. Riepe MW, Esclaire F, Kasischke K, et al. Increased hypoxic tolerance by chemical inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation: "chemical preconditioning". J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1997;17:257-264.[Medline]
  25. Riepe MW, Kasischke K, Gericke CA, Lowe A, Hellweg R. Increase of hypoxic tolerance in rat hippocampal slices following 3-nitropropionic acid is not mediated by endogenous nerve growth factor. Neurosci Lett. 1996;211:9-12.[Medline]
  26. Riepe MW, Ludolph AC. Chemical preconditioning: a cytoprotective strategy. Mol Cell Biochem. 1997;174:249-254.[Medline]
  27. Hellweg R, von Arnim CAF, Büchner M, Huber R, Riepe MW. Neuroprotection and neuronal dysfunction upon repetitive inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation. Exp Neurol. 2003;183:346-354.[Medline]
  28. Dell'Anna ME, Calzolari S, Molinari M, Iuvone L, Calimici R. Neonatal anoxia induces transitory hyperactivity, permanent spatial memory deficits and CA1 cell density reduction in developing rats. Behav Brain Res. 1991;45:125-134.[Medline]
  29. Lohmann P, Lange-Asschenfeldt C, Huber R, Riepe MW. The stamp of ancestry: roots of behavioral and neuronal impairment in adulthood. Exp Neurol. 2006;200:104-111.[Medline]
  30. von Arnim CA, Hellweg R, Buchner M, Huber R, Riepe MW. Regional selectivity of amyloid mRNA expression and neurotrophins on repetitive inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation. J Neural Transm. 2005;112:491-498.[Medline]
  31. Hellweg R, Lohmann P, Huber R, Kuhl A, Riepe MW. Spatial navigation in complex and radial mazes in APP23 animals and neurotrophin signaling as a biological marker of early impairment. Learn Mem. 2006;13:63-71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Lange-Asschenfeldt C, Lohmann P, Riepe MW. Hippocampal synaptic depression following spatial learning in a complex maze. Exp Neurol. 2007;203:481-485.[Medline]
  33. Rapp PR, Amaral DG. Individual differences in the cognitive and neurobiological consequences of normal aging. Trends Neurosci. 1992;15:340-345.[Medline]
  34. Morris RG, Schenk F, Tweedie F, Jarrard LE. Ibotenate lesions of hippocampus and/or subiculum: dissociating components of allocentric spatial learning. Eur J Neurosci. 1990;2:1016-1028.[Medline]
  35. Astur RS, Taylor LB, Mamelak AN, Philpott L, Sutherland RJ. Humans with hippocampus damage display severe spatial memory impairments in a virtual Morris water task. Behav Brain Res. 2002;132:77-84.[Medline]
  36. Bouffard JP, Jarrard LE. Acquisition of a complex place task in rats with selective ibotenate lesions of hippocampal formation: combined lesions of subiculum and entorhinal cortex versus hippocampus. Behav Neurosci. 1988;102:828-834.[Medline]
  37. Pearce JM, George DN, Haselgrove M, Erichsen JT, Good MA. The influence of hippocampal lesions on the discrimination of structure and on spatial memory in pigeons (Columba livia). Behav Neurosci. 2005;119:1316-1330.[Medline]
  38. Linnane AW, Marzuki S, Ozawa T, Tanaka M. Mitochondrial DNA mutations as an important contributor to ageing and degenerative diseases. Lancet. 1989;1:642-645.[Medline]
  39. Ozawa T. Mitochondrial DNA mutations and age. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;854:128-154.[Medline]
  40. Wallace DC. Diseases of the mitochondrial DNA. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:1175-1212.[Medline]
  41. Sastre J, Pallardo FV, Vina J. Mitochondrial oxidative stress plays a key role in aging and apoptosis. IUBMB Life. 2000;49:427-435.[Medline]
  42. Sharman EH, Bondy SC. Effects of age and dietary antioxidants on cerebral electron transport chain activity. Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22:629-634.[Medline]
  43. Speakman JR, Talbot DA, Selman C, et al. Uncoupled and surviving: individual mice with high metabolism have greater mitochondrial uncoupling and live longer. Aging Cell. 2004;3:87-95.[Medline]
  44. Ward MT, Stoelzel CR, Markus EJ. Hippocampal dysfunction during aging II: deficits on the radial-arm maze. Neurobiol Aging. 1999;20:373-380.[Medline]
  45. Lavoie AM, Mizumori SJ. Spatial, movement- and reward-sensitive discharge by medial ventral striatum neurons of rats. Brain Res. 1994;638:157-168.[Medline]
  46. Ragozzino KE, Leutgeb S, Mizumori SJ. Dorsal striatal head direction and hippocampal place representations during spatial navigation. Exp Brain Res. 2001;139:372-376.[Medline]
  47. Schmitzer-Torbert N, Redish AD. Neuronal activity in the rodent dorsal striatum in sequential navigation: separation of spatial and reward responses on the multiple T task. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:2259-2272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation


HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS