HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 62:1228-1232 (2007)
© 2007 The Gerontological Society of America


LECTURE SUMMARY

2006 Kent Award Lecture: Is Cell Death and Replacement a Factor in Aging?

Huber R. Warner

College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.

Address correspondence to Huber R. Warner, PhD, Associate Dean for Research, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108. E-mail: warne033{at}umn.edu

Abstract

This article briefly summarizes the Kent Award Lecture I gave at the annual meeting of The Gerontological Society of America held in Dallas, Texas, in November 2006. Cell death is a normal response of cells to cytotoxic damage due to both internal and external threats, and this cell loss is normally countered by proliferation of neighboring cells and/or replacement of these cells from progenitor cell pools. Maintaining tissue homeostasis is a critical challenge during aging, and this article describes a few aspects of the dynamic cell turnover that occurs continuously in vivo, with particular reference to the adverse effects of mutations that accelerate cell death through dysfunctional DNA metabolism, and how these events might contribute to aging in general.


I had the good fortune to arrive at the National Institute on Aging (NIA) at a time when it was becoming possible to pose mechanistic questions about the molecular basis of aging and thus obtain insights into what some of the critical risk factors might be. Prior to 1984, the research funded by the Molecular and Cellular Biology Branch of the NIA was heavily focused on describing aging systems, proposing and testing theories of aging, and comparing the properties of cells and tissues taken from young and old animals. A major symposium held at Mt. Sinai Medical School in 1986 titled "Modern Biological Theories of Aging" documented the current state of knowledge about the biological basis of aging at the time, but did not shed much new light on the mechanisms involved (1).

Three early milestones in aging research were already well past by that time, but they have continued to set the stage for later progress. These included the demonstration that caloric restriction extends the life span of rodents and delays the onset of age-related disease (2), Harman's hypothesis that oxidative damage is a major risk factor (3), and Hayflick's demonstration that human fibroblasts have a finite life span in terms of number of population doublings when grown in culture (4). These three insights and observations formed the basis for much of the basic research funded by the NIA since 1984 in response to the series of mechanistic initiatives listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Selected NIA Initiatives to Promote Mechanistic Biogerontological Research.

 
NIA INITIATIVES

Four of these initiatives (1,3–5) have been robust elements of NIA's overall research agenda; in fact, the longevity assurance gene initiative, developed and managed by Anna McCormick of the NIA's Biology of Aging Program (BAP), has undoubtedly been the most successful initiative launched by the BAP in terms of recruiting new investigators into aging research and producing novel information about longevity regulation in animal models, including yeast, nematodes, fruit flies, and mice. Work funded by these initiatives identified a number of proteins with effects on longevity, including: (i) three proteins in the insulin-signaling pathway (5–7), (ii) protein deacetylases (8), (iii) growth hormone (9), (iv) a dicarboxylic acid transport protein (10), and various antioxidant enzymes, to name a few. These results were largely due to demonstrating either that mutations in certain genes or that overexpressing certain other genes, increased life span. Increasing life span has become the well-accepted standard for showing that any gene and its protein product play a role in longevity regulation (11). Nevertheless, it is possible that short-lived models, if carefully chosen, could be informative about aging mechanisms (12).

The initiative listed in Table 1 on cell death mechanisms has not been as successful in generating convincing evidence about the basic mechanisms of aging. Although cell death clearly plays a role in degenerative diseases characterized by net cell loss, for example, neurodegenerative diseases (13), whether and how cell death plays a more general role in aging is not so clear. Even though many have assumed that failure to continue to replace lost cells from stem cell pools could be a factor in aging, a demonstration that this is a general phenomenon is lacking. The purpose of this presentation at the 2006 meeting of The Gerontological Society of America was to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding this possibility.

DNA DAMAGE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR AGING

Damage to both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA occurs continuously as has been documented by many investigators, especially by Dolle and his coworkers (14). However, it is not exactly clear how DNA damage promotes aging. Tissues differ with respect to their sensitivity to damage, but the impact of the damage apparently depends on the nature of the damage (Figure 1). Mutagenic damage such as transition and transversion mutations may lead to cancer, for example, by inactivating a tumor suppressor protein, whereas cytotoxic damage such as DNA cross-links can block DNA replication and/or transcription, thus inducing either cell senescence or apoptosis (here and elsewhere, apoptosis is used as a surrogate word to mean any form of programmed cell death). If such cell loss becomes excessive, it could well promote development of adverse age-related phenotypes (15). What kind of evidence exists to suggest that this scenario could be true besides the obvious loss of cells that contributes to Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases, ischemia, retinal degeneration, autoimmunity, etc.?


Figure 01
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The roles of DNA damage and repair in aging and cancer. Failure to repair DNA damage can promote both cancer and aging, depending on the nature of the damage, and the ability of the tissues to replace cells lost because of cell death due to both exogenous and endogenous causes

 
PREMATURE AGING MODELS?

Over the past few years, a number of mouse mutants has been generated that prematurely develop various age-related pathologies. Some of these mutants are listed in Table 2. All of these mutations not only affect some aspect of DNA metabolism, but also increase the vulnerability of cells to apoptosis. The common features of these models are that (i) they are short-lived, but not dramatically so except for the Lmna mutant; (ii) they develop aging-like phenotypes early, especially in mesenchymal tissues; and (iii) they have diminished growth rates. The critical questions are what is the timing mechanism, what causes the short stature, and why are the mesenchymal tissues particularly affected? Presumably, either something is accumulating or something is being lost with increasing age to influence the length of time until the organism fails and begins to show adverse aging-related phenotypes. One possibility is that what is failing is the ability of stem cell pools to continue to replace lost cells in the face of excessive apoptosis. If this is so, the root cause might be exhaustion of stem cell pools, dysfunction of the pools, or both.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Progeroid Mouse Mutants.

 
MUTATIONS IN THE P53 GENE

Tyner and coworkers (16) and Dumble and coworkers (17) reported isolating a p53 mouse mutant with intriguing properties. The p53+/m protein tetramer is hyperactive and delays cancer incidence, but the mice are somewhat short-lived (80% of normal) despite the reduced cancer load. These mice also develop age-associated organ atrophy coupled with reduced regenerative responses, suggesting that the hyperactive p53 protein may be inhibiting stem cell proliferation in their niches while promoting apoptosis in the peripheral tissues. The age-related phenotypes include early osteoporosis, poor wound healing, dermal thinning, muscle atrophy, and reduced subcutaneous adipose tissue. These mutant mice also have reduced hematopoietic stem cell populations.

MUTATIONS IN THE XPD GENE

De Boer and coworkers (18) generated a mouse with a mutation in the XPD gene that codes for a DNA helicase involved in both transcription and DNA repair. These mice are somewhat deficient in DNA repair, but severely compromised in transcription, presumably due to stalled transcription complexes that promote apoptosis. They are short-lived and also develop age-related phenotypes comparable to those in the p53+/m mice. In particular, the nature of the premature osteoporosis has been examined by Raman microscopy showing that the bone mineral content in these mice is reduced, although the bone matrix content is normal (19), which is consistent with the lower osteogenic potential seen with increasing age in humans.

OTHER PRO-AGING MUTATIONS

Mutations in other genes that promote early death in mice, with accompanying typical age-related phenotypes, include p63 (20), Ku86 (21), PolgA (22), and Lmna (23) (coding for a p53-like protein, an enzyme required for double-strand break repair, mitochondrial DNA polymerase, and a nuclear envelope protein, respectively; Table 2). The p63 mutant mice are not cancer-prone but die prematurely, resembling the phenotype of the p53+/m mice. Although the PolgA mice synthesize mitochondrial DNA, the synthesis is error-prone so these mice accumulate mutations, but not due to increased oxidative stress, although the cells are prone to apoptosis (24). The Lmna mice resemble the human phenotypes of Hutchinson-Gilford syndrome (HGS), and their cells are subject to premature apoptosis as are cells from HGS patients (25). Thus, the common features of these mutants are vulnerability to cell death, premature development of aging-related phenotypes in mesenchymal tissues, and reduced life spans, and all of the defects affect some aspect of DNA metabolism. Whether cell replacement potential is compromised has not been directly studied in any of these systems, but the phenotypes suggest it could well be another common feature.

STEM CELL REPLACEMENT POTENTIAL AND AGING

Whereas replacement of lost cells with progenitors from stem cell pools may be difficult to measure directly, decreasing growth rate and organ atrophy with increasing age suggest that this could be a problem in at least some of the prematurely aging mouse models. A recent burst of articles related to p16INK4a expression suggests that this may also be a factor during normal aging (26–29). Aging causes an increase in p16INK4a, a potent tumor suppressor that promotes longevity by suppressing the development of cancer (26), but also induces cell senescence. However, this may have a cost in terms of suppressing stem/progenitor cell proliferation, thereby reducing tissue regeneration and repair and reducing longevity. This is a typical example of antagonistic pleiotropy in which a function that is beneficial early in life may become detrimental later in life. Manipulating the expression of p16INK4a in mice shows that increasing expression decreases brain neurogenesis (27) and pancreatic islet regeneration after exposure to a beta-cell toxin (28), whereas the absence of p16INK4a improves the repopulating potential of hematopoietic stem cells (29) and improves the stress tolerance of cells. Beausejour and Campisi (26) point out that, although this raises the possibility of treating aging-related diseases with inhibitors of p16INK4a activity or expression of the gene, the strategy would be risky because p16INK4a-deficient mice die early from cancer.

In a comprehensive review, Sethe and coworkers (30) summarized what is currently known about aging of mesenchymal stem cells (30). They concluded that there is evidence to suggest aging-related changes in quantity of stem cells, as well as changes in their ability to regenerate and differentiate. For example, researchers have concluded that the chondrogenic potential of stem cells in culture declines with age (31), whereas hair graying has been attributed to selective apoptosis of melanocyte stem cells, but not of differentiated melanocytes in the niche (32). In contrast, muscle differentiation programs are qualitatively compromised in Lmna-defective myoblasts, resulting in impaired myogenic potential (33).

The above results emphasize the general need to devise stem cell therapies for age-related diseases characterized by cell loss to replace these lost cells with either endogenous adult stem cells or exogenously supplied stem cells. Some success has been achieved from both approaches. Conboy and Rando (34) increased the regenerative potential of satellite cells by inducing Notch activity; they also demonstrated that young mice contain a circulating factor that activates old satellite cells. Sun and Bartke (35) showed that increased insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in brain improves neurogenesis from endogenous precursors, apparently by reducing apoptosis. In contrast, LaBarge and Blau (36) used bone marrow–derived cells to generate muscle fiber in response to injury, and Orlic and coworkers (37) also used bone marrow cells to replace cells lost due to cardiac infarct damage. Success has even been reported using heterologous cord-blood cells to treat children with Hurler's syndrome, a progressive deterioration of the central nervous system due to accumulation of mucopolysaccharide (38); this success was achieved without doing whole-body irradiation to destroy existing bone marrow cells. These results prompted the NIA to issue a program announcement in 2005 to encourage attempts to test stem cell therapy in mouse models of premature aging like those listed in Table 2.

HUMAN PROGEROID SYNDROMES

The above results raise the question of whether compromised cell replacement has a causal role in human progeroid syndromes. This seems like a possibility in childhood progeria, that is, HGS. Fibroblasts from HGS patients are prone to apoptosis (25), and growth failure then begins to manifest itself in the children in year 2. Halaschek-Wiener and Brooks-Wilson (39) have argued for such an interpretation of the pattern of segmental pathologies associated with HGS, in the absence of increased cancer risk. In general, the tissues most affected are those for which stem cells are required for regeneration or repair of ongoing damage (e.g., subcutaneous adipose tissue and bones), tissues undergoing mechanical stress (e.g., the vascular system and joints), and tissues required to support continuous growth (e.g., hair follicles and nails), whereas cataracts and neurodegenerative pathologies are not observed in HGS children.

Werner's syndrome (WS) is characterized by both growth failure and increased cancer risk. Patients with WS lack a DNA helicase that plays many roles, including a critical structural role in optimizing DNA repair (40). It is possible that these individuals suffer from both pathways indicated in Figure 1; genome instability leading to cancer, but also some compromised DNA metabolism leading to increased apoptosis. Moderately increased apoptosis might account for the much later onset of symptoms in WS patients, that is, in the late teens versus second year of life for WS and HGS, respectively. In contrast, Bloom's syndrome (BS) patients, who also lack a DNA helicase, are born small and remain small throughout their short life of about 20 years. Although cells from BS patients are very prone to p53-dependent apoptosis due to stalled replication forks (41), they do not develop typical age-related phenotypes, indicating that apoptosis alone is not sufficient to cause these phenotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results discussed above suggest that we need to know much more about whether and why cell replacement potential decreases with increasing age, and if so, how this contributes to the various phenotypes that are routinely associated with aging in humans. Even more importantly, we need to understand why individuals within a population age differently, as only then will we understand how to delay the onset of such aging phenotypes that occur in some individuals, but not others. It appears that progeroid mouse mutants may provide an opportunity to more easily study these phenotypes in models where dramatic changes occur, in contrast to the almost imperceptible changes that occur with time during normal aging in humans. Although we will not know whether the events that occur in rapidly aging mice perfectly mimic aging-related changes in humans, it is likely that useful insights will be gained that may prove useful in understanding human aging (12), and for developing strategies that may be useful in maintaining cognitive and physical functioning into late life in humans.

Acknowledgments

I sincerely thank the National Institute on Aging (NIA) for the opportunity to work in the area of biogerontology during my tenure there from 1984 to 2005, Dr. Richard L. Sprott for his support and mentoring from 1984 to 2000, my other coworkers at the NIA during the period from 1984 to 2005, and The Gerontological Society of America for the 2005 Kent Award honoring my achievements in this field while I was an employee of the NIA.

Footnotes

Decision Editor: Estela E. Medrano, PhD

Received April 19, 2007

Accepted June 25, 2007

References

  1. Warner HR, Butler RN, Sprott RL, Schneider EL., Modern Biological Theories of Aging. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1987.
  2. McCay CM, Crowell MF, Maynard LA. The effect of retarded growth upon the length of life span and upon ultimate body size. J Nutr. 1935;10:63-79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Harman D. A theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J Gerontol. 1956;11:298-300.[Free Full Text]
  4. Hayflick L. The in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res. 1965;37:614-636.[Medline]
  5. Morris JZ, Tissenbaum HA, Ruvkun G. A phosphatidyl-inositol-3-OH kinase family member regulating longevity and diapause in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1996;382:536-539.[Medline]
  6. Kimura KD, Tissenbaum HA, Liu Y. Ruvkun G. daf-2, an insulin receptor-like gene that regulates longevity and diapause in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1997;277:942-946.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Schieke SM, Finkel T. Mitochondrial signaling, TOR, and life span. Biol Chem. 2006;387:1357-1361.[Medline]
  8. Howitz KT, Bitterman KJ, Cohen HY, et al. Small molecule activators of sirtuins extends Saccharomyces cerevisiae life span. Nature. 2003;425:191-196.[Medline]
  9. Brown-Borg HM, Borg KE, Melinska CJ, Bartke A. Dwarf mice and the ageing process. Nature. 1996;384:33.[Medline]
  10. Rogina B, Reenan RA, Nilsen SP, Helfand SL. Extended life-span conferred by cotransporter gene mutations in Drosophila. Science. 2000;290:2137-2140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Miller RA. ‘Accelerated aging’: a primrose path to insight? Aging Cell. 2004;3:47-51.[Medline]
  12. Warner HR, Sierra F. Models of accelerated ageing can be informative about the molecular mechanisms of ageing and age-related pathology. Mech Ageing Dev. 2003;124:581-587.[Medline]
  13. Warner HR, Hodes RJ, Pocinki K. What does cell death have to do with aging? J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:1140-1146.[Medline]
  14. Dolle MET, Giese H, Hopkins CL, et al. Rapid accumulation of genome rearrangements in liver but not brain of old mice. Nat Genet. 1997;17:431-434.[Medline]
  15. Campisi J. Cellular senescence and apoptosis: how cellular responses might influence aging phenotypes. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38:5-11.[Medline]
  16. Tyner SD, Venkatachalam S, Choi J, et al. p53 mutant mice that display early ageing-associated phenotypes. Nature. 2002;415:45-53.[Medline]
  17. Dumble M, Gatza C, Tyner S, et al. Insights into aging obtained from p53 mutant mouse models. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1019:171-177.[Medline]
  18. de Boer J, Andressoo JO, de Wit J, et al. Premature aging in mice deficient in DNA repair and transcription. Science. 2002;296:1276-1279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. van Appledoorn AA, de Boer J, van Steeg H, et al. Physicochemical composition of osteoporotic bone in the trichothiodystrophy premature aging mouse determined by confocal Raman microscopy. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:34-40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Keyes WM, Wu Y, Vogel H, et al. p63 deficiency activates a program of cellular senescence and leads to accelerated aging. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1986-1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Vogel H, Lim D-S, Karsenty G, et al. Deletion of Ku86 causes early onset of senescence in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:10770-10775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Trifunovic A, Wredenberg A, Falkenberg M, et al. Premature ageing in mice expressing defective mitochondrial DNA polymerase. Nature. 2004;429:417-423.[Medline]
  23. Mounkes LC, Kozlov S, Hernandez L, et al. A progeroid syndrome in mice is caused by defects in A-type lamins. Nature. 2003;423:298-301.[Medline]
  24. Kujoth GC, Hiona A, Pugh TD, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutations, oxidative stress and apoptosis in mammalian aging. Science. 2005;309:481-484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Bridger JM, Kill I. Aging of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome fibroblast is characterized by hyperproliferation and increased apoptosis. Exp Gerontol. 2004;39:717-724.[Medline]
  26. Beausejour CM, Campisi J. Ageing: balancing regeneration and cancer. Nature. 2006;443:404-405.[Medline]
  27. Molofsky AV, Slutsky SG, Joseph NM, et al. Increasing p16INK4a expression decreases forebrain progenitors and neurogenesis during ageing. Nature. 2006;443:448-452.[Medline]
  28. Krishnamurthy J, Ramsey MR, Ligon KL, et al. p16INK4a induces an age-dependent decline in islet regenerative potential. Nature. 2006;443:453-457.[Medline]
  29. Janzen V, Forkert R, Fleming HE, et al. Stem-cell ageing modified by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a. Nature. 2006;443:421-426.[Medline]
  30. Sethe S, Scutt A, Stolzing A. Aging of mesenchymal stem cells. Ageing Res Rev. 2006;5:91-116.[Medline]
  31. Zheng H, Martin JA, Duwaytri Y, et al. Impact of aging on rat bone bone-derived stem cell chondrogenesis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:136-148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Nishimura EK, Granter SR, Fisher DE. Mechanisms of hair graying: incomplete melanocyte stem cell maintenance in the niche. Science. 2005;307:720-724.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Frock RL, Kudlow BA, Evans AM, et al. Lamin A/C and emerin are critical for skeletal muscle satellite cell differentiation. Genes Dev. 2006;20:486-500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Conboy IM, Rando TA. Aging, stem cells and tissue regeneration: lessons from muscle. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:407-410.[Medline]
  35. Sun LY, Bartke A. Adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus of long-lived mice during aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:117-125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. LaBarge MA, Blau HM. Biological progression from adult bone marrow to mononucleate muscle fiber in response to injury. Cell. 2002;111:589-601.[Medline]
  37. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, et al. Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infracted heart, improving function and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:10344-10349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Staba SL, Escolar ML, Poe M, et al. Cord-blood transplants from unrelated donors in patients with Hurler's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1960-1969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Halaschek-Wiener J, Brooks-Wilson A. Progeria of stem cells: stem cell exhaustion in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:3-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Chen L, Huang S, Lee L, et al. WRN, the protein deficient in Werner syndrome, plays a critical role in optimizing DNA repair. Aging Cell. 2003;2:91-199.
  41. Davalos AR, Campisi J. Bloom syndrome cell undergo p53-dependent apoptosis and delayed assembly of BRCA1 and NBS1 repair complexes at stalled replication forks. J Cell Biol. 2003;29:1197-1209.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
H. R. Warner
Research on Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., August 1, 2008; 63(8): 775 - 776.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
L. B. Gordon, C. J. Harling-Berg, and F. G. Rothman
Highlights of the 2007 Progeria Research Foundation Scientific Workshop: Progress in Translational Science
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., August 1, 2008; 63(8): 777 - 787.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation


HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS