HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 61:1294-1299 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America


SPECIAL SECTION

Cerebral Perfusion Changes in Older Delirious Patients Using 99mTc HMPAO SPECT

Tamara G. Fong, Sidney T. Bogardus, Jr.,3, Aditya Daftary, Eliza Auerbach, Hal Blumenfeld, Sharada Modur, Linda Leo-Summers, John Seibyl and Sharon K. Inouye

Departments of 1 Neurology and 2 Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Departments of 3 Medicine and 5 Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
4 Teleradiology Solutions, Bangalore, India.
6 Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York.
7 Department of Statistics, Ohio State University, Columbus.
8 Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, Connecticut.
9Aging Brain Center, Institue for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts.

Address correspondence to Tamara G. Fong, MD, PhD, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail: tfong{at}bidmc.harvard.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background. Prior studies describe variable cerebral blood flow changes in delirium. This study aims to investigate cerebral blood flow changes in older hospitalized patients with delirium, the population in which most cases of delirium occur.

Methods. Participants included hospitalized general medical patients aged 65 years and older with documented delirium and no relevant medical conditions or preexisting abnormalities on neuroimaging prospectively studied using 99mTc HMPAO single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans obtained during and after resolution of delirium. Twenty-two patients enrolled in the study, of whom six completed both scans. All participants underwent neuropsychological assessment immediately prior to SPECT scanning. SPECT images were compared across all participants during delirium; for patients completing paired scans, within-patient comparisons were made.

Results. Visual assessment of SPECT scans revealed perfusion abnormalities in frontal (5 participants) or parietal regions (6 participants); scans were normal in 11 participants (50%). Region-of-interest analysis identified reduced blood flow (p <.01) in the left inferior frontal, right temporal, right occipital, and pontine regions. Analysis of paired scans revealed reversible abnormalities in three participants (p <.001), with decreased right parietal perfusion in two participants and increased left parietal perfusion in one participant.

Conclusions. The results of this study of a small group of general medical patients are suggestive that frontal or parietal cerebral perfusion abnormalities occur in delirium, and these findings need to be confirmed by future, larger studies. These results may help to improve basic understanding of delirium pathophysiology, to identify long-term changes, and to evaluate response to treatment over time.


ALTHOUGH epidemiological studies have identified clinical risk factors for delirium (1–3), and controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that delirium can be prevented (4,5), delirium remains a challenging condition to identify and treat, and the basic pathophysiology of delirium has yet to be fully described. Neuroimaging techniques that measure cerebral blood flow are increasingly used to provide anatomic localization of disease pathophysiology (6). Previous studies using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron-emission tomography (PET) in delirium describe variable changes in blood flow. For example, delirium tremens is associated with globally increased cerebral perfusion (7), hepatic encephalopathy may result in reductions in temporoparietal and occipital perfusion and either increases or decreases in subcortical perfusion (8–12), and postcardiotomy delirium is associated with decreased parietooccipital and temporal perfusion (13). Many of these studies are case studies of patients with specific causes of delirium, rather than general medical patients who typically constitute the majority of patients with delirium in the hospital.

The aim of the present study is to use SPECT to determine patterns of regional cerebral perfusion among hospitalized general medical patients both during and after resolution of delirium. Determining distinct anatomic patterns in delirium might help to identify pathways underlying the clinical phenomena of delirium and clarify whether there are common neuroanatomic patterns among the diverse etiologies for delirium, findings which may in turn lead to more effective preventive and treatment strategies.


    METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Setting and Participants
Potential participants were patients admitted to the general medicine floors at Yale–New Haven Hospital (YNHH; New Haven, CT) between November 5, 2001 and December 16, 2002. YNHH is a 944-bed urban teaching hospital with 200 general medical beds serving a large local community and referral population. Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 65 years, presence of delirium as documented by the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) (14), and absence of relevant medical conditions (epilepsy, drug and/or alcohol abuse, moderate to severe dementia, coma, severe illness, or respiratory isolation). Patients were excluded if computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated any preexisting abnormalities, including tumors, large strokes, or focal atrophy. Of 103 consecutive patients meeting study eligibility criteria, 81 patients were excluded because of refusal to participate (n = 58), early hospital discharge (n = 10), illness, agitation or dementia (n = 7), poor quality scans (n = 3), inability to consent (n = 2), or incomplete neuropsychological testing (n = 1). Twenty-two patients met eligibility criteria and completed SPECT scanning and neuropsychological testing during delirium. Six of these patients were retested after resolution of delirium. The remaining 16 patients did not have complete clinical improvement of delirium prior to hospital discharge. A single patient who had paired SPECT scans but incomplete neuropsychological testing was included only in the analysis of paired scans. Written informed consent was obtained using a dual consent procedure from each patient and a surrogate according to procedures approved by the Yale Institutional Review Board.

Cognitive Assessments and Variables
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used as an overall measure of cognitive function (15). Attention, which is invariably impaired in delirium, was measured with the Digit Span Test (16) and vigilance subtest from the Cognitive Test for Delirium (CTD) (17). The presence and severity of delirium were documented using the CAM (14), a validated and widely used instrument for the diagnosis of delirium, and additional measures of delirium severity included the Delirium Rating Scale-98 (DRS) (18) and the CTD (17). Preexisting dementia was assessed using the Modified Blessed Dementia Rating Scale (19), and functional status was determined using the Index of Activities of Daily Living (20). Admitting diagnoses, severity of illness, laboratory results, vital signs, and medications were obtained from a brief nurse interview and review of the medical records.

SPECT Imaging
Immediately following cognitive testing, participants were taken to the SPECT scanner, placed in a darkened, quiet environment, and after 5 minutes injected with 962 MBq (26 mCi) of 99 mTc HMPAO. Fifteen minutes after injection, participants were placed in a two- or three-headed SPECT camera (Axis 3000 or Prism 2000; Phillips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) outfitted with high-resolution parallel hole collimators. To minimize anticipated head movement, a series of seven serial 5-minute images were obtained into a symmetric photopeak window centered at 140 keV. The serial SPECT scans were summed, transverse reconstructed, and filtered using a 3-D low-pass ramp filter with order 4.0 and cutoff 0.26. Homogeneous attenuation correction was performed by using the Chang method (21) with an attenuation of 0.11/cm.

SPECT Analysis
Analysis of SPECT blood flow images was performed in three ways: (i) visual analysis of scans; (ii) semiquantitative region of interest (ROI) analysis; and (iii) statistical parametric mapping (SPM99; Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, London, U.K.; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) of paired scan data sets.

Images were reviewed independently and by consensus by two board-certified nuclear medicine physicians (J.S., A.D.) and a neurologist (H.B.) with extensive clinical expertise in SPECT perfusion studies and qualitative interpretation of perfusion abnormalities. Reviewers were blinded to specific clinical information about individual participants. All scans were compared with the participant's baseline computed tomography and/or MRI to ensure that the perfusion changes did not correlate with an existing anatomic lesion.

For the semiquantitative ROI analysis, initial normalization of the participant scans was performed using SPM99 with MedX 3.4 (Sensor Systems, Sterling, VA), implemented on a Linux platform (7.0; Red Hat Software, Inc., Raleigh, NC) by a protocol published previously (22,23). Briefly, the SPM realign function was used to create a mean image and reslice the reconstructed images. Images were then spatially normalized to the SPM SPECT template in the SPM standard anatomical space (MNI space). Smoothing was performed using a 10 x 10 x 12 mm Gaussian kernel. Proportional scaling to the global mean was performed using an analysis threshold of 0.8.

Following established methods (24), circular ROI measuring 6024 mm3 were defined for the cerebellum, inferior frontal, superior frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes. A circular ROI measuring 3528 mm3 was defined for the pons and midbrain. The regions were placed over representative areas on a normal MRI template in standard anatomical space (see http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/Imaging/mnispace.html) by two separate observers (J.S. and A.D.). The SPECT scans were coregistered to the MRI, and the same regions were pasted over the normalized SPECT images. The numbers of counts in each ROI were calculated and normalized to the mean counts in the two cerebellar regions for each participant to create a blood flow ratio. The cerebellum was used as the reference region because it has not been found to be significantly involved in delirium and because of low variation of counts in this region. Comparisons of blood flow ratios were made against age- and handedness-matched controls (n = 11) from a standard SPECT databank.

The data from six participants with paired scans were compared using a paired-sample t test for areas of relative hyper- and hypoperfusion on SPECT images obtained during active and then resolved delirium. The extent threshold (k) below which clusters were rejected was 125 voxels, which is equivalent to a volume of 1 cm3 and corresponds to the approximate resolution of brain SPECT imaging. The voxel level threshold was set at 0.01.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Participant Characteristics
Participant characteristics are presented in Table 1. On average, participants were ≥80 years old, with 12 years of education. Most were women, and all were right-handed. Over half had impairment in activities of daily living, and most had preexisting cognitive impairment. During hospitalizations, 89% of participants were rated as moderately ill, and 11% as mildly ill. All participants had delirium according the CAM criteria, with the delirium rated as mild in 50% and moderate in 44% by clinical judgment and delirium severity scores on the CAM (4) and DRS. However, mean scores on the CTD and DRS were slightly above cutoffs for delirium, suggesting that the average delirium severity was mild. During delirium, an average score of 19.1 (±5.2) on the MMSE indicates significant cognitive impairment. Mean scores on the forward and backward digit span and vigilance tests indicate substantial impairments in attention. The cause of delirium on medical record review was felt to be multifactorial in the majority of cases, with the most common contributing factors being medications (77%), preexisting dementia or cognitive impairment (59%), infection (50%), dehydration (36%), metabolic (36%), hypoxia (14%), and immobility (14%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Participant Characteristics.

 
Qualitative Visual SPECT Analysis
Qualitative visual analysis of the SPECT scans revealed perfusion abnormalities in 11 participants (50%) (Figure 1 and Table 2). Five participants had perfusion abnormalities in the frontal lobes, with two bifrontal perfusion decreases, one left frontal perfusion decrease, one left frontotemporal perfusion decrease, and one left frontal perfusion increase. Six participants had perfusion abnormalities in the parietal lobes, with four left parietal perfusion decreases, one right parietal perfusion decrease, and one biparietal perfusion decrease. The participant with a left frontal perfusion increase also had a right occipital perfusion decrease, and one of the participants with a left parietal perfusion decrease also had a diffuse cortical perfusion decrease. The remaining 11 participants had no detectable perfusion abnormalities. Seven of the 11 participants with perfusion abnormalities and 8 of the 11 participants without perfusion abnormalities had baseline cognitive impairment on the Modified Blessed Dementia Rating Scale. Comparison of delirium severity among participants with perfusion changes and those without demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward perfusion changes occurring in participants with more severe delirium (DRS for abnormal scan, 19.8 ± 5.4 vs 15.6 ± 4.5 for normal scan group, p =.06).


Figure 01
View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Examples of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion changes in study patients with delirium. A, Normal; B, bilateral frontal hypoperfusion; C, bilateral parietal hypoperfusion; D, hyperperfusion of subcortical structures (seen normally with aging); E, left frontal hypoperfusion; F, right parietal hypoperfusion

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Qualitative Analysis of SPECT Scan Perfusion Abnormalities (N = 22).

 
Semiquantitative ROI Analysis
Delirious participants had significant (p <.01) decreases in regional blood flow ratios in the pons, left inferior frontal, right temporal, and right occipital lobes compared to controls (Table 3). Correlation between regional blood flow in the left inferior frontal lobe and cognitive performance on attention tests approached statistical significance (p =.057, data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Delirium Compared to Control Participants.

 
Paired SPECT Analysis
Analysis of the paired SPECT scans, performed during delirium and after delirium resolution, revealed no differences in perfusion by qualitative visual analysis; however, significant (p <.001) perfusion changes were detected with SPM in the parietal lobes in three of six participants (Table 4). Two participants demonstrated decreases in perfusion in the right parietal lobe, and one demonstrated increased perfusion in the left parietal lobe. The mean time interval between the first and second scans was 2.67 days (standard deviation 1.51), with a median of 2 days and range of 1–5 days. The mean change in score in the DRS (second score minus first score) was –7.17 (standard deviation 8.21), with a median of –8.0 and range of –19 to 3. There were no significant baseline differences between participants who had paired scans compared to those having only a single scan, in terms of age, gender, race, handedness, MMSE, and DRS (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Perfusion Changes in Paired SPECT Scans.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Unlike prior studies that focused on specific causes of delirium, this study, although relatively small scale, is currently the largest of its type, and importantly, included patients with delirium from multiple etiologies to more accurately represent the typical clinical condition. Qualitative visual analysis of the SPECT scans identified changes in frontal and parietal lobe perfusion in half of the participants. Semiquantitative analysis revealed significant changes in the blood flow ratios in the left inferior frontal, right temporal, right occipital, and pontine areas. Correlation of the scans with attention scores, one of the hallmarks of delirium, suggested that inattention was associated with perfusion abnormalities in the left inferior frontal region. Analysis of paired SPECT scans in six participants who were studied in delirious and nondelirious states suggests that changes in perfusion occur in the parietal lobe.

The neuroanatomical localization of delirium pathology has implications for understanding both symptoms and underlying mechanisms. Some of the key features of delirium, including inattention, disorientation, and comprehension deficits, have been associated with regional pathology. For example, attention is associated with the nondominant posterior parietal and bifrontal areas, the thalamus, and the pons (25,26); orientation is associated with nondominant parietal, medial orbitofrontal and temporal cortex (27,28); and comprehension is associated with frontal and temporal regions (29,30). Thus, the predominance of findings in the frontal and parietal regions and pons (by ROI analyses) is an important result in this study, and is consistent with what is known of the neuroanatomical localization of important delirium symptoms.

There are a number of limitations to this study. Because participants must lie still for the SPECT scan, only those persons with hypoactive delirium could be included. Inclusion of participants with more prominent delirium symptoms, where changes may be more evident, or use of other functional imaging techniques, might allow for detection of subtle perfusion changes. In addition, changes in global blood flow could not be determined, and such changes in perfusion might play a critical role in delirium. In contrast to the visual assessment and SPM analysis of the paired scans, the ROI analysis identified trends, but not statistically significant differences in the parietal lobe. This discrepancy may be related to the small sample size (i.e., inadequate power) or to methodological errors (i.e., positioning of the ROI in the parietal lobe), or could reflect variability of perfusion changes in this region, as observed in the paired scan analysis with increased perfusion in one participant and decreased perfusion in others. A reduction in blood flow in the pons, an area critical for attention, was detected only in the ROI analysis, and further confirmation of this finding is needed.

Delirium is a heterogeneous, global process resulting in fluctuating mental status that likely involves widespread electrophysiological and neurochemical abnormalities. For these reasons, delirium is inherently challenging to study. Furthermore, patients most likely to suffer from delirium are older patients who commonly have preexisting brain abnormalities, such as atrophy, vascular insults, tumors, or dementia, which could contribute to changes in blood flow independent of delirium, and making comparisons across individuals is difficult. To minimize effects of multiple variables, within-individual comparisons of paired scans obtained in delirious and nondelirious states were intended to address this methodological challenge. Unfortunately, logistical difficulties (such as early discharge or persistence of delirium) made it possible to obtain paired scans in only 6 of the 22 participants, and limited the conclusions that can be drawn from this study. Furthermore, although on average the paired participants had a 41% reduction in severity of delirium score, they may not have fully recovered by the time of the second scan. Controls from a normal SPECT database were used, rather than controls chosen from the same hospitalized cohort who did not develop delirium, and it is possible that changes seen on the paired scans may have been the result of treatment, underlying medical illness, or other aspects of the hospitalization. Although there were no baseline differences between participants who were able to have paired scans compared to those who had only a single scan, the findings from these six individuals cannot be generalized across all participants. Future studies will benefit from strong efforts to obtain serial scans on individuals with delirium, to more fully characterize longitudinal changes, and to better understand the variability in severity and recovery from delirium.

Despite the considerable challenge of enrolling actively delirious and ill patients, this study was able to obtain SPECT scans in a sizable number of general medical patients and provides important preliminary data in the study of functional brain changes in delirium. The results suggest potential involvement of the frontal and parietal lobes in the neuropathology of delirium. Because delirium is such an important clinical syndrome, and because little is known about the fundamental pathophysiology of delirium, efforts to unravel the underpinnings of delirium represent a crucial step along the path toward providing necessary and appropriately targeted improvements in treatment and preventive strategies. Moreover, these results may provide a basis to identify long-term changes and to evaluate response to treatment over time.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This work was supported in part by a Donaghue Investigator Award from the Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation (DF98-105), by grants from the National Institute on Aging (R21AG025193 and K24AG00949), by the Education Core of the Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (P50AG005134), by a conference grant from the Alzheimer's Association, and by the Aging Brain Center, Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife. Dr. Inouye is supported in part by the Milton and Shirley F. Levy Family Chair.

We acknowledge with much gratitude the following people for their invaluable help: Sandra Ginter for project coordination; Kelly McNally for assistance with SPECT analysis and interpretation; and Joseph Agostini, MD, for assistance with medical record abstraction.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Decision Editor: Luigi Ferrucci, MD, PhD

Received July 6, 2006

Accepted September 28, 2006


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Inouye SK, Charpentier PA. Precipitating factors for delirium in hospitalized elderly persons. Predictive model and interrelationship with baseline vulnerability. JAMA. 1996;275:852-857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Marcantonio ER, Goldman L, Mangione CM, et al. A clinical prediction rule for delirium after elective noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 1994;271:134-139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Schor JD, Levkoff SE, Lipsitz LA, et al. Risk factors for delirium in hospitalized elderly. JAMA. 1992;267:827-831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Inouye SK, Bogardus ST, Jr., Charpentier PA, et al. A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:669-676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Wright RJ, Resnick NM. Reducing delirium after hip fracture: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:516-522.[Medline]
  6. Waxman A, Chugani H, Seibyl J. Medical imaging in neurological disorders. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2002;42:S48-S49.
  7. Hemmingsen R, Vorstrup S, Clemmesen L, et al. Cerebral blood flow during delirium tremens and related clinical states studied with xenon-133 inhalation tomography. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145:1384-1390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kohira I, Matsuo E, Shiro Y, et al. Hepatic encephalopathy with increased cerebral blood flow in SPECT and MRI abnormalities in the basal ganglia. Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol. 1994;48:33-36.[Medline]
  9. Trzepacz PT, Tarter RE, Shah A, Tringali R, Faett DG, Van Thiel DH. SPECT scan and cognitive findings in subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1994;6:170-175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Mouratidis B, Lomas F. Brain SPECT imaging with Tc-99m HMPAO in hepatic encephalopathy. Clin Nucl Med. 1995;20:842.[Medline]
  11. Ohta H, Matsumoto R, Kato T, Tomono N, Shimizu T. Tc-99m HMPAO brain perfusion SPECT images in a patient with portal-systemic encephalopathy. Clin Nucl Med. 1998;23:634-636.[Medline]
  12. Catafau AM, Kulisevsky J, Berna L, et al. Relationship between cerebral perfusion in frontal-limbic-basal ganglia circuits and neuropsychologic impairment in patients with subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:405-410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Gokgoz L, Gunaydin S, Sinci V, et al. Psychiatric complications of cardiac surgery postoperative delirium syndrome. Scand Cardiovasc J. 1997;31:217-222.[Medline]
  14. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:941-948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198.[Medline]
  16. Cummings JL. Clinical neuropsychiatry. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton; 1985.
  17. Hart RP, Levenson JL, Sessler CN, Best AM, Schwartz SM, Rutherford LE. Validation of a cognitive test for delirium in medical ICU patients. Psychosomatics. 1996;37:533-546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Trzepacz PT, Mittal D, Torres R, Kanary K, Norton J, Jimerson N. Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98: comparison with the delirium rating scale and the cognitive test for delirium. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;13:229-242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Blessed G, Tomlinson BE, Roth M. The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. Br J Psychiatry. 1968;114:797-811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914-919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Chang L. Method for attenuation correction in computed tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1987;25:638-643.
  22. Gunaydin B, Babacan A. Cerebral hypoperfusion after cardiac surgery and anesthetic strategies: a comparative study with high dose fentanyl and barbiturate anesthesia. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;4:12-17.[Medline]
  23. Blumenfeld H, McNally KA, Vanderhill SD, et al. Positive and negative network correlations in temporal lobe epilepsy. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:892-902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Daftary A, Shulman A, Strashun AM, Gottschalk C, Zoghbi SS, Seibyl JP. Benzodiazepine receptor distribution in severe intractable tinnitus. Int Tinnitus J. 2004;10:17-23.[Medline]
  25. Cabeza R, Nyberg L. Imaging cognition II: an empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000;12:1-47.[Medline]
  26. Trzepacz PT. Update on the neuropathogenesis of delirium. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1999;10:330-334.[Medline]
  27. Schnider A, von Daniken C, Gutbrod K. Disorientation in amnesia. A confusion of memory traces. Brain. 1996;119:(pt 5): 1627-1632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ushijima Y, Okuyama C, Mori S, Nakamura T, Kubota T, Nishimura T. Relationship between cognitive function and regional cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer's disease. Nucl Med Commun. 2002;23:779-784.[Medline]
  29. Grossman M, Cooke A, DeVita C, et al. Sentence processing strategies in healthy seniors with poor comprehension: an fMRI study. Brain Lang. 2002;80:296-313.[Medline]
  30. Cooke A, Zurif EB, DeVita C, et al. Neural basis for sentence comprehension: grammatical and short-term memory components. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;15:80-94.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. A. Redelmeier MD MSHSR, D. Thiruchelvam MSc, and N. Daneman MD
Delirium after elective surgery among elderly patients taking statins
Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 23, 2008; 179(7): 645 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
T. T. Hshieh, T. G. Fong, E. R. Marcantonio, and S. K. Inouye
Cholinergic Deficiency Hypothesis in Delirium: A Synthesis of Current Evidence
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., July 1, 2008; 63(7): 764 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
J. McManus, R. Pathansali, R. Stewart, A. Macdonald, and S. Jackson
Delirium post-stroke
Age Ageing, November 1, 2007; 36(6): 613 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
S. K. Inouye and L. Ferrucci
Introduction: Elucidating the Pathophysiology of Delirium and the Interrelationship of Delirium and Dementia
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., December 1, 2006; 61(12): 1277 - 1280.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
D. C. Alsop, M. A. Fearing, K. Johnson, R. Sperling, T. G. Fong, and S. K. Inouye
Review Article: The Role of Neuroimaging in Elucidating Delirium Pathophysiology
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., December 1, 2006; 61(12): 1287 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation


HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS