HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 60:1425-1431 (2005)
© 2005 The Gerontological Society of America

Effects of Progressive Resistance Training on Body Composition in Frail Older Adults: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Ellen F. Binder1,, Kevin E. Yarasheski1, Karen Steger-May3, David R. Sinacore1,2, Marybeth Brown4, Kenneth B. Schechtman3 and John O. Holloszy1

1 Department of Internal Medicine, 2 Program in Physical Therapy, and 3 Division of Biostatistics, Claude Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
4 Physical Therapy Program, School of Health Professions, University of Missouri–Columbia.

Address correspondence to Ellen F. Binder, MD, Division of Geriatrics and Nutritional Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 4488 Forest Park Blvd., Suite 201, St. Louis, MO 63108. E-mail: ebinder{at}im.wustl.edu


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background. Progressive resistance exercise training (PRT) has been shown to increase muscle strength and fat-free mass (FFM) in elderly persons. Limited information is available regarding the effects of PRT on lean and fat mass in frail elderly persons.

Methods. Ninety-one community-dwelling sedentary men and women, 78 years and older with physical frailty (defined using standardized objective criteria) were enrolled in a 9-month trial of exercise training (ET). Physical frailty was defined as having 2 of the 3 following criteria: modified Physical Performance Test score between 18 and 32, peak aerobic power between 10 and 18 ml/kg/min, or self-report of difficulty or assistance with two instrumental activities of daily living or one basic activity of daily living. Participants were randomly assigned to either a control (CTL) group that performed a low intensity home exercise program or a supervised ET group that performed 3 months of low intensity exercise and 3 months of PRT.

Results. After completion of PRT, ET participants had greater improvements than did CTL participants in maximal voluntary force production for knee extension (mean {Delta} +5.3 ± 13 ft/lb vs +1.1 ± 11 ft/lb, p =.05), measured using isokinetic dynamometry. Total body FFM (measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry) increased in the ET group, but not in the CTL group (mean {Delta} +0.84 ± 1.4 kg vs +0.01 ± 1.5 kg, p =.005). Total, trunk, intra-abdominal, and subcutaneous fat mass (measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and 1H-magnetic resonance imaging) did not change in response to PRT.

Conclusions. Three months of supervised PRT induced improvements in maximal voluntary thigh muscle strength and whole body FFM in frail, community-dwelling elderly women and men. This supervised exercise program may not be sufficient to reduce whole-body or intra-abdominal fat area in this population.

Age-associated losses of skeletal muscle mass and strength (1–3) and increased fat mass (4–6) are well documented, and are associated with important clinical outcomes such as mobility impairments (3,7,8), disability (2,8–10), falls (9), and fractures (3). There is an accumulating body of evidence in support of progressive resistance exercise training (PRT) as an intervention to delay or reverse sarcopenia (11–13). Numerous studies performed in healthy older adults have consistently shown that high intensity PRT induces significant increases in fat-free mass (FFM) (14–16), muscle fiber area (17,18), and muscle cross-sectional area (19–21). A few studies have shown that PRT can decrease total fat-mass (14–16) and visceral fat (22,23). The observed changes in body composition have varied between studies, and relate to the intensity and duration of the intervention, study sample characteristics and size, and measurement techniques. Limited information is available for physically frail elderly populations, who are at greatest risk for sarcopenia and related morbidity. There is some evidence suggesting that the muscle hypertrophy response to PRT may be impaired in very old individuals (19,24). The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in FFM and fat mass in response to PRT, in frail community-dwelling elderly women and men.


   METHODS
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Participants
Men and women 78 years and older were recruited from the community to participate in a 9-month ET study. Participants provided written informed consent, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Washington University School of Medicine.

We used objective criteria to define mild to moderate physical frailty. To be eligible, volunteers had to meet at least two of three of the following criteria: 1) modified Physical Performance Test score between 18 and 32 (possible maximum score = 36), 2) report of difficulty and/or assistance with up to two instrumental activities of daily living and/or one basic activity of daily living, 3) peak aerobic power (VO2peak) between 10 and 18 ml·kg–1·min–1. Our screening instruments and procedures have been described (25).

Exclusion criteria were: 1) active serious illness within the past 6 months or conditions that would contraindicate weight training; 2) cognitive impairment judged to interfere with informed consent or completion of assessments or ET; 3) neuromuscular disorders more difficult to ameliorate with exercise (severe Parkinson's disease, stroke with hemiparesis, myasthenia gravis); 4) sensory impairments judged to interfere with following instructions for testing or exercise; 5) chronic use of steroids or immunosuppressive drugs; 6) use of estrogen, androgen, or progesterone-containing compound within 12 months; 7) cigarette use within 12 months; and 8) diagnosis of cancer within 5 years (except for superficial skin cancer).

Baseline and Follow-up Assessments
Diet evaluation.-- Under the supervision of a registered dietician, participants completed 3-day food records at baseline and on completion of each exercise phase. The food intake records were analyzed for total energy intake and macronutrient content using Nutritionist IV (First Databank, San Bruno, CA). A specific diet was not prescribed, and participants were instructed not to make drastic changes in their diet. To control for variations in calcium and vitamin D intake, participants were provided with supplemental calcium and vitamin D, to adjust intake to about 1200 mg/day and 600 IU/day, respectively.

Skeletal muscle strength.-- Maximal voluntary muscle strength for knee extension and flexion was measured with isokinetic dynamometry, using procedures that have been described (26). One-repetition maximum (1-RM) testing was performed only for participants in the ET group, as described below.

Body composition.-- Total body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) (Hologic QDR1000/W, software version 6.2OD; Waltham, MA) was used to assess FFM and fat mass (27). Coefficients of variation in our laboratory for total FFM, trunk fat, leg lean mass, and leg fat mass are 1.8%, 2%, 5%, and 5%, respectively.

Proton magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to obtain images of the abdomen at baseline and after 6 months. Serial images above and below the L4–L5 interspace were acquired on a 1.5-T superconducting magnet (Siemens, Iselin, NJ) using a T1-weighted pulse sequence. NIH Image (v1.62) analysis software (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD) was used to identify and quantify abdominal subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat areas. Within a region, fat was quantified using segmentation and pixel intensity thresholding to visually separate fat from other tissues. To minimize classification errors, pre- and postintervention MRI images were analyzed at the same time by a trained technician who was blinded to group assignment. The coefficients of for intra-abdominal (visceral) fat area (VAT) and subcutaneous fat area (SAT) are 6 ± 3% and 7 ± 1%, respectively.

Randomization Procedures
Study participants were randomly assigned, on completion of the baseline assessments, to ET or control (CTL) groups in a 3:2 ratio, using a computer-generated random permutation procedure (28) and a block design.

ET Program
The supervised ET program consisted of three, approximately 3-month-long, phases of ET that have been previously described in detail (25). This report focuses on muscle strength and body composition measures obtained after the second exercise phase.

Phase 1 exercise used a group format and included 22 exercises that focused on improving flexibility, balance, coordination, speed of reaction and, to a modest extent, strength that has been described previously (29). Phase 2 added PRT. After familiarization with the equipment, 1-RM voluntary strength was measured on each of six different exercises (knee extension, knee flexion, seated bench press, seated row, leg press, biceps curl), which were performed bilaterally on a Hoist weightlifting machine (Hoist Fitness Systems, San Diego, CA). Initially, the participants performed 1–2 sets of 6–8 repetitions of each exercise at 65% of their 1-RM. Our goal was for the participants to progress their workload to 3 sets of 8–12 repetitions performed at 85%–100% of the initial 1-RM, although not all participants were able to achieve this goal. Measurements of 1-RM were repeated at monthly intervals so that workloads could be progressed. The participants also continued to perform a shortened version of the Phase 1 exercises. Phase 2 exercise sessions took 60–90 minutes to complete, including rest periods.

Participants were required to attend exercise sessions 3 times/week and complete 36 sessions of each exercise phase before follow-up assessments and progression to the next phase of ET.

Home Exercise Program (CTL Group)
This program included 9 of the 22 exercises included in Phase I of the ET program, and focused primarily on flexibility (29). CTL participants attended a monthly exercise class at our exercise facility, and used a calendar to self-monitor adherence to the exercises. They were asked to perform the exercises at home 2–3 times/week. Follow-up testing was performed at the end of each 3-month interval.

Statistical Analysis
Individuals that provided DEXA data at the 3-month and 6-month time points (before and after Phase 2) were included in this analysis, including participants who discontinued the interventions that provided such data. Between-group comparisons of continuous variables were performed using t tests, or Wilcoxon's test as a nonparametric alternative. Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests were used for between-group comparisons of categorical variables. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to evaluate variables that were measured at only two time points, using the 6-month value as the dependent variable and the 3-month value as covariate (or baseline for MRI measures). Associations between continuous variables were analyzed with Pearson's correlation coefficient. Statistical significance was defined as {alpha} level ≤ 0.05. Data were analyzed using SAS statistical software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).


   RESULTS
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Recruitment
Four hundred forty-four individuals (152 men; 292 women) underwent the pre-enrollment evaluations (Figure 1). One hundred sixty-five were excluded from participation: 113 did not meet the selection criteria (79 too fit; 16 too frail; 67 women taking hormone-replacement therapy), and 70 had medical exclusions. Sixty-seven women elected to enroll in a concurrent study of exercise combined with hormone-replacement therapy, and 93 individuals declined participation.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Results of randomization and participant flow

 
Of the 119 individuals enrolled (69 ET, 50 CTL), 91 completed Phase 2 and provided complete DEXA data at 3 and 6 months after baseline (Figure 1). Seven ET participants discontinued the intervention by month 6 but provided follow-up data, and 20 participants (15 ET, 5 CTL) dropped out before 6 months and did not provide follow-up data. Eight participants (1 ET, 7 CTL) completed Phase 2 but did not provide complete DEXA data. Reasons for dropout are described in Figure 1. Two individuals in the ET group developed or exacerbated existing soft tissue injuries in the shoulder regions and dropped out of the study. There were no other adverse events. In comparison to participants included in the analysis, those who failed to provide follow-up data were older (85 vs 83 years, p =.01), had a lower modified Physical Performance Test score (25 vs 29, p =.004), and had a lower VO2peak (13.3 ml·kg–1·min–1 vs 15.4 ml·kg–1·min–1, p =.0004), but there were no significant differences in initial DEXA measures. Of the 91 participants who provided DEXA follow-up data, 54 also provided MRI data at baseline and 6 months.

Participant Characteristics
The mean age of participants in both groups was 83 ± 4 years, with a trend toward a lower percentage of Caucasians in the ET group (p =.06). There were no other differences in the baseline characteristics of the study groups (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Sample (N = 91).

 
Compliance with Protocol
For the ET group, the time to complete Phase 2 was 140 ± 41 days (median = 128 days), whereas for the CTL group it was 100 ± 25 days (median = 98 days) (p <.0001). Time to complete Phase 1 and 2 was 277 ± 62 days (median = 259 days) for the ET group, and 241 ± 68 days (median = 224 days) for the CTL group (p =.01). ET participants exercised an average of 2.2 ± 0.3 days/week. Average workloads for four representative resistance exercises over the course of Phase 2 are presented in Table 2. The seven ET participants who discontinued Phase 2 and provided follow-up data completed 28.4 ± 2.9 sessions (range 23–31).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. PRT Workloads for ET Participants (N = 53).

 
ET and Skeletal Muscle Strength
We observed significant group differences in the change in knee extension (Table 3). For the ET group, there was also a significant increase in all 1-RM measures (Table 4). The relative increase in 1-RM for the ET group was 17% (leg flexion) to 43% (leg extension) above the pretraining value.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Changes in Muscle Strength Measured Using Cybex Isokinetic Dynamometry.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4. Changes in Bilateral 1-RM Strength Measures for ET Participants.

 
ET and Body Composition
FFM increased more in the ET group than in the CTL group (p =.005) (Table 5). Regional DEXA measurements indicated greater increases in leg lean mass in the ET group than in the CTL group (p =.03 for left leg, p =.06 for right leg). All between-group differences in change remained significant after controlling for sex. For ET participants, mean change in FFM between 3 and 6 months was correlated with mean change in 1-RM for knee extension (r = 0.43, p =.004). The change in isokinetic knee extension torque for the ET group was correlated with total weight lifted during months 3–6 (r = 0.30, p =.04). Changes in trunk or leg fat mass were not different between the groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 5. Whole-Body and Regional Fat-Free Mass and Fat Mass Measured by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA).

 
Fifty-four participants (20 CTL; 34 ET) provided MRI data at baseline and 6 months. Baseline VAT was 179 ± 85 cm2 for the CTL group (215 ± 92 cm2 for men; 142 ± 62 cm2 for women), and 195 ± 104 cm2 for the ET group (240 ± 97 cm2 for men; 145 ± 90 cm2 for women) (group difference, p =.53). Baseline SATs were 167 ± 48 cm2 (CTL) and 192 ± 99 cm2 (ET) (p =.73). Between baseline and 6 months, the change in VAT was –3.8 ± 29 cm2 for the CTL group and –7.0 ± 43 cm2 for the ET group (p =.69) (median percent change –0.6% vs –7.2%, respectively); the change in SAT was –2.1 ± 28 cm2 for the CTL group and –3.9 ± 25 cm2 for the ET group (p =.72) (median percent change –2.5% vs –4.6%, respectively).

Total energy intake at 3 months was 1912 ± 384 kcal for the ET group and 1766 ± 356 kcal for the CTL group (p =.20); at 6 months it was 1932 ± 402 kcal for the ET group and 1925 ± 392 kcal for the CTL group (p =.92; p =.29 for group change between 0 and 6 months; p =.74 for change between 3 and 6 months). Total body weight at 6 months was 77 ± 16 kg for the ET group and 71 ± 14 kg for the CTL group (p =.92; p =.29 for group change between 0 and 6 months).


   DISCUSSION
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
These findings confirm that supervised PRT induces greater increases in lean mass and muscle strength than home-based exercise in frail women and men 78 years old and older. We have previously reported that these gains translate to improvements in functional performance and self-reports of disability (25). Depending on the exercise and gender, 1-RM strength increased between 17% and 43% above baseline. These changes are not as large as those observed in previous 12-week PRT studies in elderly participants (17,19,30). However, those trials studied healthier participants (17,30) or frail institutionalized elderly persons who performed a more limited set of PRT exercises (19). Our findings are limited to, and have better applicability to, frail community-dwelling elderly individuals with multiple comorbidities who are willing to participate in a PRT program.

Our supervised ET protocol was generally well tolerated, with few adverse events directly related to exercise. It is easily adaptable to fitness centers and outpatient physical therapy settings, many of which now have PRT facilities. Our goal was for participants to perform PRT exercises at 85% of their 1-RM, but many participants were unable to achieve that. Also, many participants required longer than 6 months to complete Phases 1–2 of the ET intervention due to acute illness, weather, and holidays. Replication of our ET program in community-based settings will require personal trainers and physical therapists with sufficient training to adapt the exercises to physical impairments common in frail elderly people (e.g., from arthritis, inactivity, or previous injuries), and prescribe appropriate and realistic exercise intensities for this population.

In agreement with prior reports, the magnitude of the increases in total body and leg lean mass was less than the observed strength gains. The change in lean mass was, however, related to the change in 1-RM strength. The absolute and relative increases in lean mass are consistent with previous 12-week studies of PRT in elderly persons (19). Our findings support the notion that PRT can stimulate skeletal muscle hypertrophy even in physically frail elderly persons, but the increases in strength observed over this relatively short time period are due largely to factors such as neural recruitment mechanisms (19,31,32).

Previous investigators have reported that PRT reduces whole-body fat mass (14–16) and regional fat mass (22,23,33) in elderly men and women. Campbell (14) observed decreases in whole-body fat mass, using hydrodensitometry, in healthy 56- to 80-year-old men and women, in response to 12 weeks of PRT and a controlled energy diet. Treuth and colleagues (23) observed decreases in intra-abdominal fat mass using single-slice computed tomography scans, but not total fat mass (hydrodensitometry) in healthy elderly women after 16 weeks of PRT. In a separate study of elderly men, using a more intensive 16-week PRT protocol and a diet that restricted changes in caloric intake, they observed significant decreases in total and trunk fat mass by DEXA (16). Hunter and colleagues (22) observed significant reductions in percent fat and fat mass in 26 healthy, nonobese, 61- to 77-year-old women and men, and intra-abdominal fat mass by computed tomography only in the women, after 25 weeks of high intensity PRT. We did not observe greater reductions in total or regional fat mass in the ET versus the CTL group. Although we monitored the participants' dietary intake periodically, and did not observe changes over time, we did not rigorously control the participants' energy intake. It is possible that the participants in our study either underreported their energy intake or increased it episodically in response to the energy demands of ET. In addition, ET participants did not exercise at as high an intensity as did participants in prior studies in which fat mass decreased. However, studies of the effects of exercise on abdominal adiposity have not established a clear dose-response effect (34). Baseline abdominal MRI measurements for our participants were above the threshold associated with increased risk for the metabolic syndrome (e.g., VAT > 100 cm2) (35,36), and the observed changes were not of sufficient magnitude for risk reduction. It is possible that PRT combined with aerobic training and/or decreased energy intake is necessary in frail elderly people to achieve clinically significant reductions in abdominal adiposity. Further study is needed to clarify the optimal PRT regimen for reducing fat mass in this population, and to determine if PRT-induced fat losses confer metabolic or cardiovascular benefits in physically frail elderly persons relative to their baseline adiposity.

Our study had several limitations. First, for purposes of recruitment and retention, our CTL group performed low intensity home exercise, which could have maintained their strength and FFM more than it would in a sedentary control group. Therefore, we may have underestimated the magnitude of the changes in strength and body composition in response to PRT. Second, our sample size may have been too small, and our power inadequate, to detect significant changes in fat mass, and it is possible that our findings represent a Type II error. Third, the variability in MRI measures of fat area may have limited our ability to detect changes. Fourth, the 3-month PRT program may have been too short or of insufficient intensity to induce changes in FFM and fat mass comparable to those in studies in healthier populations.

Conclusion
In frail, community-dwelling elderly men and women, low to moderate intensity PRT induced greater increments in total and regional FFM, and isokinetic muscle strength, but no changes in fat mass, when compared to a home-based, low intensity exercise program. Additional studies are needed to confirm our findings and identify factors that augment the beneficial effects of PRT on body composition in frail elderly persons and related effects on functional performance and disability.


   Acknowledgments
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Claude Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC) grant P01-AG13629 and by NIH General Clinical Research Center grant 5-M01 RR00036. We thank Debbie Bronder, Jil Yarasheski, and all the staff of the OAIC and the General Clinical Research Center for technical assistance with this project.


   Footnotes
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Decision Editor: John E. Morley, MB, BCh

Received December 4, 2003

Accepted February 15, 2005


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Baumgartner RN, Water DL, Gallagher D, Morley JE, Garry PJ. Predictors of skeletal muscle mass in elderly men and women. Mech Ageing Dev. 1999;107:123-126.[Medline]
  2. Janssen I, Heymsfeld S, Ross R. Low relative skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disability. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:889-896.[Medline]
  3. Melton LJ, 3rd, Khosla S, Riggs BL. Epidemiology of sarcopenia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:S10-S12.
  4. Going S, Williams D, Lohman T. Aging and body composition: biological changes and methodological issues. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1995;23:411-458.[Medline]
  5. Hughes VA, Frontera WR, Roubenoff R. Longitudinal changes in body composition in older men and women: role of body weight change and physical activity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:473-481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kyle UG, Genton L, Hans D, et al. Total body mass, fat mass, fat-free mass, and skeletal muscle in older people: cross-sectional differences in 60-year-old persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1633-1640.[Medline]
  7. Davison KK, Ford ES, Cogswell ME, Dietz WH. Percentage of body fat and body mass index are associated with mobility limitations in people aged 70 and older from NHANES III. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1802-1809.[Medline]
  8. Sternfeld B, Ngo L, Satariano W, Tager I. Associations of body composition with physical performance and self-reported functional limitations in elderly men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:110-121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Baumgartner R, Koehler K, Gallagher D, et al. Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:755-763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Visser M, Harris TB, Langlois J, et al. Body fat and skeletal muscle mass in relation to physical disability in very old men and women of the Framingham Heart Study. J Gerontol Med Sci. 1998;53:M214-M221.[Abstract]
  11. Fielding RA. The role of progressive resistance training and nutrition in the preservation of lean body mass in the elderly. J Am Coll Nutr. 1995;14:587-594.[Abstract]
  12. Hurley BF, Roth S. Strength training in the elderly: effects on risk factors for age-related diseases. Sports Med. 2000;30:249-268.[Medline]
  13. Singh M. Exercise comes of age: rationale and recommendations for a geriatric exercise prescription. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2002;57:M262-M282.[Free Full Text]
  14. Campbell WW. Increased energy requirements and changes in body composition with resistance training in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;60:167-175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Nickols J, Omizo D, Peterson K, Nelson K. Efficacy of heavy-resistance training for active women over sixty: muscular strength, body composition, and program adherence. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41:205-210.[Medline]
  16. Treuth M, Ryan A, Pratley RE, et al. Effects of strength training on total and regional body composition in older men. J Appl Physiol. 1994;77:614-620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Charette SL, McEvoy L, Pyka G, et al. Muscle hypertrophy response to resistance training in older women. J Appl Physiol. 1991;70:1912-1916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Frontera WR, Hughes VA, Lutz KJ, Evans WJ. A cross-sectional study of muscle strength and mass in 45- to 78- year old men and women. J Appl Physiol. 1991;71:644-650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Fiatarone MA, O'Neill EF, Ryan ND, et al. Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1769-1775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hurley BF, Reitan RM, Pratley RE, Treuth M, Rogers A, Goldberg AP. Effects of strength training on muscle hypertrophy and muscle cell disruption in older men. Int J Sports Med. 1995;16:378-384.[Medline]
  21. Roth S, Ivey F, Martel G, et al. Muscle size responses to strength training in young and older men and women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1428-1433.[Medline]
  22. Hunter G, Bryan D, Wetzsein C, Zuckerman P, Bamman M. Resistance training and intra-abdominal adipose tissue in older adult men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1023-1028.[Medline]
  23. Treuth M, Hunter G, Kekes-Szabo T, Weinsier R, Goran M, Berland L. Reduction in intra-abdominal adipose tissue after strength training in older women. J Appl Physiol. 1995;78:1425-1431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Fiatarone MA, Ding W, Manfredi TJ, et al. Insulin-like growth factor I in skeletal muscle after weight-lifting exercise in frail elders. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:E135-E143.
  25. Binder EF, Schechtman KB, Ehsani AA, et al. Effects of exercise training on measures of frailty in community-dwelling elderly adults: results of a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1921-1928.[Medline]
  26. Brown M, Sinacore DR, Binder EF, Kohrt WM. Physical and performance measures for the identification of mild to moderate frailty. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2000;55A:M350-M355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Binder EF, Kohrt WM. Relationships between body composition and bone mineral content and density in older women and men. Clin Exerc Physiol. 2000;2:84-91.
  28. Friedman LM, Furberg C, DeMets DC. The randomization process. In: Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. Littleton, MA: John Wright PSG, Inc.; 1980.
  29. Brown M, Sinacore DR, Ehsani AA, Binder EF, Holloszy JO, Kohrt WM. Low-intensity exercise as a modifier of physical frailty in older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:960-965.[Medline]
  30. Frontera WR, Meredith CN, O'Reilly KP, Knuttgen HG, Evans WJ. Strength conditioning in older men: skeletal muscle hypertrophy and improved function. J Appl Physiol. 1988;64:1038-1044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hakkinen K, Kallinen M, Izquierdo M, et al. Changes in agonist-antagonist EMG, muscle CSA, and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people. J Appl Physiol. 1998;84:1341-1349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sale DG. Neural adaptation to resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;20:S135-S145.[Medline]
  33. Ross R, Rissanen J, Pedwell H, Clifford J, Shragge P. Influence of diet and exercise on skeletal muscle and visceral adipose tissue in men. J Appl Physiol. 1996;81:2445-2455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Ross R, Janssen I. Physical activity, total and regional obesity: dose-response considerations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:S521-S527.[Medline]
  35. Despres JP, Lamarche B. Effects of diet and physical activity on adiposity and body fat distribution: implication for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Nutr Res Rev. 1993;6:137-159.
  36. Nicklas BJ, Pennix BW, Ryan AS, Berman DM, Lynch NA, Dennis KE. Visceral adipose tissue cutoffs associated with metabolic risk factors for coronary heart disease in women. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1413-1420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ptjournalHome page
H. H Host, D. R Sinacore, K. L Bohnert, K. Steger-May, M. Brown, and E. F Binder
Training-Induced Strength and Functional Adaptations After Hip Fracture
Physical Therapy, March 1, 2007; 87(3): 292 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
L. Ferrucci and E. M. Simonsick
A Little Exercise
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2006; 61(11): 1154 - 1156.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
The LIFE Study Investigators* [*See Appendix for L
Effects of a Physical Activity Intervention on Measures of Physical Performance: Results of the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P) Study
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2006; 61(11): 1157 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS