HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 60:1324-1327 (2005)
© 2005 The Gerontological Society of America

Acute Phase Response Detection and Quantitation at the Point of Care in Older Adults With Acute Bacterial Infections

Ori Rogowski1, Itzhak Shapira1, Shlomo Berliner1,, Jack Serov2, Pinhas Halpern2, David Zeltser1, Bernard Rudensky3 and Tzvi Dwolatzky4

Departments of 1 Medicine "D" and 2 Emergency Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Tel Aviv, Israel.
3 Clinical Laboratory and4 Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (Affiliated with Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel).

Address correspondence to Professor Shlomo Berliner, MD, PhD, Director, Department of Medicine "D", Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman Street, Tel Aviv 64239 Israel. E-mail: shapiraiz{at}tasmc.health.gov.il


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background. We investigated the reliability of a slide test in determining the presence of acute bacterial infections in a group of older adults to determine the usefulness of this test at the point of care.

Methods. The study group included older adults with an acute bacterial infection and matched controls. We examined the white blood cell count (WBCC), the erythrocyte sedimentation, fibrinogen concentration, and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), in addition to the slide test that reveals the number of leukocytes and degree of erythrocyte aggregation.

Results. There were 144 patients and 144 controls at a respective mean ± standard deviation age of 71.3 ± 20.7 and 70.6 ± 20.2 years. A highly significant difference was noted between patients and controls in all laboratory markers, both conventional and those obtained by the slide test. By using hs-CRP, we correctly predicted the individual group as control or bacterial infection. When analyzed by means of a receiver-operated characteristic (ROC) curve, hs-CRP was again most reliable, with the slide leukocyte test being superior to the WBCC.

Conclusion. The slide leukocyte count provided a similar diagnostic yield to that of the WBCC. The availability of this slide test at the point of care will provide the clinician with a useful biomarker when faced with clinical decisions in the care of older adults.


THE prompt identification of acute bacterial infections in older adults might have significant prognostic and therapeutic implications. It is also important to recognize those patients who react with an overwhelming inflammatory response to the invading microorganism. It was suggested that this hyperinflammatory response is frequently in itself deleterious to the patient (1).

We have previously reported that a simple slide can be used for the identification of the above-mentioned acute phase response (2,3). The availability of this approach via telemedicine may enable the determination of the intensity of the inflammatory response even in residents of nursing homes where modern laboratory services are not constantly available.

In the present study we used an improved method of our previously described system in a model of acute bacterial infections in older adults. We examined the reliability of this system as compared to accepted conventional markers of the acute phase response.


    METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The participating units included the Emergency Department and the Department of Internal Medicine "D" at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and the Emergency Department and the Departments of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics at the Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem, Israel. We included older adults presenting with signs and symptoms consistent with an acute bacterial infection.

The diagnosis of an acute bacterial infection was based on the typical clinical presentation in patients with erysipelas or cellulitis, the presence of lobar pneumonia by chest x-ray, positive blood cultures in patients with sepsis, and urine cultures in individuals with urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis. The diagnosis of pyelonephritis was based on the presence of fever with or without chills, urinary findings, and flank tenderness. Patients were recruited in the two medical centers situated in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem by following a strict unified protocol that ensured the same recruitment criteria. Although we can not be sure that patients with atypical pneumonia were included, it is the practice of most clinicians to assume that adults with fever, cough, and a pulmonary infiltrate should be treated as patients with bacterial infections until otherwise proven. Patients were excluded if they had received antibiotic treatment prior to the presentation, if they had an underlying inflammatory condition (such as, among others, arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease), or if they were on steroidal or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (except for aspirin in a dosage of up to 325 mg/d). These exclusions were needed to make sure that the inflammatory reactions result from the acute infectious disease and not from an underlying disease.

Controls
Age- and sex-matched controls were included if they had no overt infectious and inflammatory disease or condition in the 6-month period prior to their recruitment. They were recruited from a group of retired employees of both Medical Centers that participated in the study.

Laboratory Methods
Blood count was performed by using the Coulter STKS (Beckman Coulter, Nyon, Switzerland) electronic analyzer. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was determined by the method of Westergren, fibrinogen by the method of Clauss and using a Sysmax 6000 (Sysmex Corporation, Hyaga, Japan) analyzer, and the high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) concentrations were determined by using the Boering BN II Nephelometer (DADE Boering, Marburg, Germany) analyzer.

Slide Test
Venous blood was gently mixed with sodium citrate 3.8% at a ratio of 3 volumes of whole blood to one volume of citrate. The blood was applied to a glass slide kept at an angle of 30° as described (4). After several minutes they were analyzed with an image analyzer (5) consisting of a Pentium Win 95 equipped with a Matrox Meteor (Matrox Ltd., Montreal, Canada) color frame grabber, a color CCD camera, and a microscope which was operated at x200 magnification, resulting in an image resolution of 0.4 micron per pixel. The analysis was performed by a technician who was completely blinded to any clinical or laboratory data of the patients or the controls. Two variables were obtained, namely, the number of white blood cells per square millimeter (slide leukocytes) and the erythrocyte percentage (EP), the latter being a marker of the humoral acute phase response (6). The EP is practically the area covered on the slides by the erythrocytes. For example, if there is no aggregation, 100% of the slide is covered by the cells. When they begin to aggregate, free spaces are created between the aggregates and this percentage is reduced. The validity of the slide test has been confirmed in previous studies (7–9).

Statistical Analysis
All continuous variables were summarized and displayed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and all the categorical data were summarized and displayed as the number and percentage of participants in each group. Because the hs-CRP has a non-normal distribution, we thus used a logarithmic transformation; the results are expressed as back-transformed geometric means and SDs. For all continuous variables, a comparison between the participants with bacterial infection and the healthy controls was performed using Student's t test for independent samples. We used discriminant analysis to determine the ability of the different inflammatory variables to correctly classify the participants according to group (bacterial infection or control). To further evaluate the performance of classification schemes and to compare the different inflammatory variables (classifiers), we used a receiver-operated characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. We calculated the area under the curve to compare the classifiers and the asymptotic statistical significance to reject the hypothesis that the curve is similar to the reference line, which is a random classifier. The SPSS statistical package was used to perform all statistical evaluations (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Following the exclusion of 14 individuals, we included a total of 144 patients (68 women and 76 men with a mean ± SD age of 71.3 ± 20.7 years) with acute bacterial infections. Controls included 144 apparently healthy individuals with no infectious or inflammatory conditions aged 70.6 ± 20.2 years with a sex distribution identical to that of the patients. The frequencies of the different diagnoses in the group of patients with acute bacterial infections are reported in Table 1. A highly significant difference was noted between patients and controls in all laboratory markers, both conventional and those obtained by our image analyzer (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Frequency of the Different Diagnoses in the Bacterial Group.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Minimum, Maximum, Mean, and Standard Deviations (SD) of Different Inflammatory Parameters in Both Groups and Statistical Significance Between the Means.

 
The ability of the different variables to correctly predict the group as control or bacterial infection is reported in Table 3; hs-CRP was superior to the others, followed by the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, WBCC, ESR, EP, and slide leukocyte count. However, it should be noted that the absolute difference between the hs-CRP and EP (markers of the humoral acute phase response) was 12.3%, whereas that between the WBCC by the electronic cell analyzer and our slide test was only 0.6%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Percent of Correct Classification of the Different Variables Predicting the Control or Bacterial Group.

 
We evaluated our results further by using ROC analysis (Table 4). By this method, hs-CRP was most reliable, followed by the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, slide leukocytes, ESR, WBCC, and EP. In this model, a better ROC curve was noted for the slide leukocytes than for the WBCC by the electronic analyzer. The absolute difference between both markers of the humoral acute phase response (hs-CRP and EP) was 13 in favor of hs-CRP. Typical pictures obtained from several patients and a control individual are shown in Figure 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Receiver-Operated Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis of the Different Variables Predicting the Controls and the Bacterial Groups.

 


View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Typical picture obtained from a patient with gram-negative sepsis (left) and an appropriate control (right)

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The presence and intensity of an acute phase response are easily identified by simple biomarkers, such as hs-CRP, WBCC, and ESR. Whereas paramedical personnel can perform the ESR, quantitative hs-CRP and WBCC require laboratory facilities that are not readily available, particularly in small nursing homes and in centers situated in the periphery. There is thus a need to develop an alternate approach that is readily available. We have previously described such an approach which is based on a count of the number of white blood cells in an unstained peripheral blood slide (10,11) and on the degree of erythrocyte adhesiveness and aggregation (12–15). This approach permits a dual analysis, namely, that of the cellular acute phase response (number of leukocytes) and the humoral one (expressed as the degree of erythrocyte adhesiveness and aggregation).

The main finding of the present study is that, in older adults, the slide leukocyte count provided a similar diagnostic yield to the WBCC by electronic analyzer in differentiating between persons with acute bacterial infections and matched controls. Similar results were obtained when comparing the slide EP to the Westergren ESR. The best biomarker was quantitative hs-CRP, but the absolute difference between the results of hs-CRP and slide biomarkers was not substantial. This difference was 6.6% between hs-CRP and slide leukocytes (Table 3), and the difference between the ROC curves was even smaller (5%).

A potential advantage for a given individual is that the picture obtained by the slide test can be easily transmitted to a remote location where it can be analyzed and the results reported to the user (10,11). Further, the establishment of an Inflammation Data Center (16) allows an automatic matching of appropriate controls. In fact, data from more than 3000 apparently healthy individuals are already available at this center and are used to provide matched controls. This is of particular importance considering the possibility that many apparently healthy individuals may suffer from low grade inflammation (17). Thus, when faced with acute infection, it is important to distinguish between the baseline degree of inflammation and the acute response.

The findings described in this study show that our approach is probably as accurate as an approach using the electronic analyzer WBCC. The possibility of using the slide leukocyte count for follow-up purposes is currently under investigation. Although the results obtained are inferior to those of quantitative hs-CRP, the absolute differences are relatively small.

We did not include individuals with viral infections in the present study. This has been evaluated previously (18–20) with a similar diagnostic yield for the slide test as compared to conventional biomarkers.

Conclusion
The slide test described provides a reasonable alternate approach when used for the detection and quantitation of the acute phase response in older adults with acute bacterial infections. This approach should be further analyzed in view of its potential to become a telemedicine-based real-time biomarker at the site of care provision.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Both Drs. Rogowski and Shapira contributed equally to this work.

Dr. Berliner is a shareholder of Inflamet Ltd. No financial or other support was obtained for this study from Inflamet Ltd.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Decision Editor: John E. Morley, MB, BCh

Received May 17, 2004

Accepted August 2, 2004


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:138-150.[Free Full Text]
  2. Rotstein R, Zeltser D, Shapira I, et al. An inflammation meter to reveal the presence and extent of inflammation in older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1739-1741.[Medline]
  3. Rotstein R, Zeltser D, Shapira I, et al. The usefulness of an inflammation meter to detect the presence of infection/inflammation in elderly patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:M122-M127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gamzu R, Rotstein R, Fusman R, Zeltser D, Berliner AS, Kupferminc MJ. Increased erythrocyte adhesiveness and aggregation in peripheral venous blood of women with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:307-312.[Medline]
  5. Fusman G, Mardi T, Justo D, et al. Red blood cell adhesiveness/aggregation, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in healthy adults and in those with atherosclerotic risk factors. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:561-563.[Medline]
  6. Schechner V, Shapira I, Berliner S, et al. Significant dominance of fibrinogen over immunoglobulins, C-reactive protein, cholesterol and triglycerides in maintaining increased red blood cell adhesiveness/aggregation: a model in hypercholaesterolemic patients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003;33:955-961.[Medline]
  7. Berliner S, Shapira I, Rogowski O, et al. Combined leukocyte and erythrocyte aggregation in the peripheral venous blood during sepsis. A clue to the presence of a commonly shared adhesive protein(s). Int J Clin Lab Res. 2000;30:27-31.[Medline]
  8. Rotstein R, Fusman R, Zeltser D, et al. The picture of inflammation: a new concept that combines the white blood cell count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate into a new hematologic diagnostic modality. Acta Haematol. 2001;106:106-114.[Medline]
  9. Sharshun Y, Brill S, Mardi T, et al. Inflammation at a glance: erythrocyte adhesiveness/aggregation to reveal the presence of inflammation in individuals with atherothrombosis. Heart Dis. 2003;5:182-183.[Medline]
  10. Rotstein R, Berliner S, Fusman R, et al. The usefulness of telemedicine for the detection of infection/inflammation at the point of care. Telemed J e-Health. 2001;7:317-323.
  11. Urbach J, Elishkewich K, Rotstein R, et al. Telemedicine-based application for the detection of inflammation in pediatrics. Telemed J e-Health. 2003;9:241-245.
  12. Samocha-Bonet D, Lichtenberg D, Tomer A, et al. Enhanced erythrocyte adhesiveness/aggregation in obesity corresponds to low-grade inflammation. Obes Res. 2003;11:403-407.[Medline]
  13. Rogowski O, Zeltser D, Rotstein R, et al. Correlated expression of adhesive properties for both white and red blood cells during inflammation. Biorheology. 2000;37:361-370.[Medline]
  14. Rotstein R, Landau T, Twig A, et al. The erythrocyte adhesiveness/aggregation test (EAAT). A new biomarker to reveal the low grade subclinical smoldering inflammation individuals with atherosclerotic risk factors. Atherosclerosis. 2002;165:343-351.[Medline]
  15. Maharshak N, Kassirer M, Zeltser D, et al. The inflammation meter: novel technology to detect the presence of infection/inflammation in patients without leukocytosis but with an increased leukocyte adhesiveness/aggregation. Acta Haematol. 2000;104:16-21.[Medline]
  16. Cohen S, Tolshinsky T, Rogowski O, et al. Real time, control adjusted evaluation of intensity of the inflammatory response. J Inform Techn Healthcare. 2003;1:195-207.
  17. Kereiakes DJ. The fire that burns within: C-reactive protein. Circulation. 2003;107:373-374.[Free Full Text]
  18. Urbach J, Rotstein R, Fusman R, et al. Reduced acute phase response to differentiate between viral and bacterial infections in children. Pediatr Pathol Mol Med. 2002;21:557-567.[Medline]
  19. Urbach J, Lebenthal Y, Levy S, et al. Leukocyte adhesiveness/aggregation test (LAAT) to discriminate between viral and bacterial infections in children. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89:519-522.[Medline]
  20. Rotstein R, Kassirer M, Zeltser D, et al. Capillary and venous leukocyte adhesiveness/aggregation to differentiate between viral and bacterial infection. Infection. 2002;30:365-372.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation


HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS