HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 58:M1049-M1054 (2003)
© 2003 The Gerontological Society of America

Risk Factors for Early and Late Mortality in Hospitalized Older Patients: The Continuing Importance of Functional Status

Maria Ponzetto1, Barbara Maero1, Paola Maina1, Rosalba Rosato2, Giovannino Ciccone2, Franco Merletti2, Laurence Z. Rubenstein3 and Fabrizio Fabris1

1 Medical and Surgical Department, Geriatric Section, University of Torino, Italy.
2 Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, University of Torino and CPO Piemonte, Italy.
3 Sepulveda Veterans Affairs Medical Center, California.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background. Prognostic information collected at hospital admission may be useful in defining care objectives and in deciding on therapy for older people. The aim of our study was to identify admission risk factors for in-hospital and postdischarge mortality.

Methods. The study included 987 patients aged 70 years and older admitted to the geriatric ward of San Giovanni Battista Hospital in Torino during 1995 and 1996. Demographic, clinical, and functional variables were collected on admission to hospital and examined as potential risk factors for mortality during hospitalization and at 5 years of follow-up.

Results. During their hospital stay, 147 patients (14.9%) died. Risk factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality included functional impairment (Activities of Daily Living [ADL]) (OR [odds ratio] 1.73, CI [confidence interval] 95% 1.02–2.95), dependence related to medical conditions (OR 2.18, CI 95% 1.39–3.42), cerebrovascular disease (OR 3.23, CI 95% 1.64–6.37), cancer (OR 4.52, CI 95% 1.99–10.24), albumin 3.0–3.4 g/dl (OR 4.51, CI 95% 2.76–7.35), albumin <3.0 g/dl (OR 6.83, CI 95% 3.59–13.0), creatinine 1.5–3 mg/dl (OR 2.23, CI 95% 1.36–3.65), creatinine >3 mg/dl (OR 2.55, CI 95% 1.10–5.93), and fibrinogen >=452 mg/dl (OR 1.91, CI 95% 1.26–2.89). During the 5-year follow-up, 553 patients (67.7%) died. Variables independently associated with mortality in multivariate analysis were age 75–84 years (HR [hazard ratio] 1.40, CI 95% 1.10–1.78), >=85 years (HR 2.08, CI 95% 1.59–2.72), male sex (HR 1.50, CI 95% 1.24–1.81), ADL dependency (HR 1.24, CI 95% 1.01–1.52), >=5 errors on Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (HR 1.34, CI 95% 1.10–1.63), dependence on Dependence Medical Index (HR 1.36, CI 95% 1.10–1.67), presence of cancer (HR 2.58, CI 95% 1.80–3.71), hemoglobin <=11 g/dl (HR 1.46, CI 95% 1.17–1.81), and Charlson's Index >=2 (HR 1.49, CI 95% 1.14–1.95).

Conclusions. A complete functional and clinical evaluation at hospital admission permits identification of patients at higher risk of early and long-term mortality.


IN older persons, an acute hospitalization typically associated with multiple diseases and disability is frequently followed by high rates of progressive physical decline and mortality in the years following discharge. Prognostic information collected during the hospital stay may be useful in defining care objectives and in deciding on therapy (1). Older adults frequently have multiple (clinical and subclinical) diseases often causing and contributing to disability (2,3). The joint contributions of diseases and disability to mortality have not been well studied (4).

There are relatively few studies concerning predictors of posthospital mortality of older patients, but from these few it appears that the following factors are important predictors of mortality: increased aged, altered mental status, impaired functional status, and number and type of diagnoses (such as neurological, neoplastic, cardiac, and pulmonary disease) (5–7).

The aim of our study was to evaluate the risk factors for hospital and postdischarge mortality in a cohort of patients, aged 70 years and older, admitted to a geriatric ward.

Our specific objectives were to identify functional measures that predict 5-year mortality in elderly persons after hospitalization, and to define the prognostic importance of clinical parameters and medical diagnoses.


    METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study was conducted on all patients admitted to the geriatric ward of San Giovanni Battista Hospital in Torino during 1995 and 1996. Of 987 hospitalized patients in that period (500 men and 487 women), 855 were discharged alive and 147 (14.9%) died. A 5-year follow-up was conducted on all 855 discharged patients. Information about their vital status was gathered from the demographic office of their municipality of residence. Completeness of follow-up was 98.2%.

Demographic, clinical, and functional variables collected on admission to hospital were analyzed as potential predictors of mortality. Cut-points for continuous variables were based on clinically meaningful thresholds or previously published studies.

We obtained data from standardized interviews performed within 48 hours of admission, with patients or relatives, and from medical records. We interviewed relatives when the patient scored >=5 errors on the 10-point Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) (8,9) or was too ill to communicate at the time of admission. Functional assessment was performed using the index of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (10). ADL impairment was defined as needing help with at least 1 of the 6 basic care skills (i.e., bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding). This cut-point has been used previously (11). The Dependence Medical Index (DMI) was used to define dependence for medical reasons (12). Patients were classified as being dependent or independent for medical reasons using the DMI, which groups 7 major criteria and 8 minor criteria. Major criteria are severe impairment in strength and/or motility in at least 2 limbs, double incontinence, pressure sores, severe disturbances in speech and communication, severe decline in sight and/or hearing not modifiable with a prosthesis, terminal illness (death expected within 6 months), and need for multiple and complex therapies. Minor criteria are mild loss of strength and/or motility in at least 2 limbs, incontinence, episodic disorientation, moderate disturbances in speech and communication, decline in sight and/or hearing only partially modifiable with a prosthesis, dizziness with a tendency to fall, chronic unstable balance, and use of a wheelchair. At least 3 minor criteria were needed as determinants of dependence for medical reasons, while only 1 major criteria was sufficient.

Cognitive status was evaluated using the SPMSQ (8,9). Patients with >=5 errors on this questionnaire were considered cognitively impaired.

We also collected laboratory values routinely obtained at the time of admission. They included albumin, hemoglobin, total serum cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, fibrinogen, and creatinine. Blood pressure was the average of the first two measures using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer with appropriate cuff size. Principal pathologies considered were cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary problem, gastrointestinal problems, cancer, and dementia. These categories were identified according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification system (ICD-9-CM). Information on length of hospital stay and of principal and secondary medical diagnoses were obtained from discharge abstracts. Comorbidity was evaluated using the Romano-adapted Charlson Index (13). The Charlson Index was originally designed to predict death in longitudinal studies, and it is commonly coded as 0, 1, 2, or more, representing the increasing burden of illness (14). The outcomes of interest were defined as hospital death or death within 5 years after hospital discharge.

The same set of variables, including demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, laboratory, and functional data, was selected a priori as potential risk factors for in-hospital and late mortality. The analysis of risk factors for in-hospital mortality was performed using logistic regression models to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Posthospital mortality was analyzed using Cox models to estimate crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI. The assumption of proportional hazard was evaluated with graphic methods using survival curves and obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method. All analyses were performed using SAS programs (15).


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The mean (standard deviation, SD) age of the total sample (987 participants) was 80.6 (6.3) years. Table 1 shows patient characteristics. Patients dependent in one or more ADLs were 56.7%. The prevalence of cognitive impairment (>=5 errors on SPMSQ) and dependence on DMI were 36.3% and 29.3% respectively. Mean length of hospital stay was 17.5 days, 45.2% patients stayed more than 14 days. During the hospital stay 147 subjects (14.9%) died.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients and Risk Factors for In-Hospital Mortality (Total Sample n = 987), Univariate and Multivariate Analyses.

 
Risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality in the univariate analysis included functional dependence (ADL), cognitive impairment, DMI dependence, cerebrovascular disease, cancer, low albumin, low hemoglobin, high serum creatinine, high fibrinogen, low HDL cholesterol, Charlson's index >=2 (Table 1). The variables independently associated with in-hospital mortality in multivariate analysis were: functional impairment (ADL), dependence related to medical conditions (DMI), cerebrovascular disease, cancer, low albumin, high creatinine, high fibrinogen (Table 1).

During 5 years of follow-up, 553 patients (67.7%) died, with a median survival of 36 months (Figure 1). Risk factors associated with 5-year mortality in the univariate analysis included older age, male sex, ADL dependency, cognitive impairment, medical dependency (DMI), presence of cancer, low levels of albumin, hemoglobin and HDL cholesterol, high level of creatinine and fibrinogen, and Charlson's index >=2. Protective variables were total cholesterol >200 mg/dL, systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg (Table 2).



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Cumulative survival: 5-year follow-up

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Risk Factors and 5-Year Mortality (Discharged Patients n = 840), Univariate and Multivariate Analyses.

 
The variables independently associated with mortality in multivariate analysis were age 75–84 years, >=85 years, male sex, ADL dependency, cognitive impairment on SPMSQ, medical dependency (DMI), presence of cancer, hemoglobin <=11 g/dL, and Charlson's Index >=2 (Table 2).


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It is important to consider clinical and functional domains when assessing a prognosis in older patients and be aware of the complexity of predicting mortality in the elderly population (16). A multidimensional and functional evaluation of hospitalized elderly persons is crucial for uncovering medical and socioeconomic problems that can cause disability and interfere with quality of life and survival.

Some studies show that multidimensional evaluation permits identification of specific risk factors for mortality in elderly patients, such as functional dependence, social isolation, poor physical activities, and low income (4,17,18). Identification at hospital admission of clinical and functional risk factors for early and long-term mortality allows optimal planning of medical and socioeconomic interventions for frail elderly patients.

Our study shows a 5-year survival after hospitalization of 32.3% (Figure 1), which reflects the frailty of hospitalized elderly patients. In our study, male sex was not a predictor of in-hospital mortality, but there was a higher long-term mortality in males, as other study authors have demonstrated (2). As expected, mortality was higher among older patients. However, in accordance with the previous study, advanced age was not a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality probably because other elements, such as severity of acute disease at hospital admission, presence of chronic pathologies, and functional impairment have a stronger predictive value on short-term mortality (18–20). Many studies have shown that measures of functional status add important information about mortality risk beyond that provided by medical diagnoses or clinical and laboratory measures (21,22). ADL dependency is an independent risk factor for both in-hospital and postdischarge mortality. It is probable that functional impairment at hospital admission is a further independent predictor of mortality other than the number and type of pathologies that caused hospitalization. This is probably because functional status reflects the severity and interactions of many different illnesses and their relationship with psychosocial factors (6,11,17). The assessment of ADLs of hospitalized older adults is essential for planning appropriate health care after discharge. Without assessing ADL functions, it is difficult to advise a patient about long-term care, identify home care needs and other support services, or evaluate patient caregiver needs (11,23–25).

The prognostic importance of ADL dependence provides further evidence supporting routine assessment of functional status in hospitalized older adults. Dependence due to medical reasons, evaluated using the DMI, is an independent risk factor for both in-hospital and posthospital mortality. The presence of highly disabling conditions, that are by themselves associated with a higher risk of mortality, are among the items listed in the DMI. The DMI is useful because it summarizes clinical conditions and gives a more comprehensive view of the functional status and health status of patients. It is important to point out the independent predictive value of both the ADL and DMI for in-hospital and posthospital mortality.

Cognitive impairment was a risk factor for posthospital mortality, but not for in-hospital mortality when adjusted for other variables. Mortality risk during hospitalization is most likely better related to functional loss than cognitive decline (26).

Cerebrovascular disease and cancer are important risk factors for in-hospital mortality, but only cancer is a predictor of posthospital mortality. Cerebrovascular disease is not a predictor of long-term mortality most likely because of high hospital mortality (about 20%). On the other hand, the risk for long-term mortality of patients affected with cerebrovascular disease is better evaluated by their functional status and comorbidity. Albumin is a marker of frailty and, in this and other studies, is also a predictor of in-hospital mortality because of its correlation with both malnutrition and disease severity (27). Hemoglobin value <=11 g/dL on univariate analysis is a risk factor both for in-hospital and posthospital mortality, but only for posthospital mortality after multivariate analysis. The presence of anemia at hospital admission can be considered a marker of severity of clinical condition, because it is frequently related to cancer or other serious pathologies (28–31).

The association between creatinine and mortality may be explained by the direct negative effects of renal dysfunction on multiple organ systems or may reflect generalized decreased tissue perfusion (32).

In accordance with other studies, comorbidity is an independent risk factor only for posthospital mortality (33). Chronic comorbidity is less important in short-term mortality but it gains importance in long-term outcome because death during a hospital stay is more influenced by mean diagnosis, acute complications, or therapeutic procedures.

A complete functional and clinical evaluation at hospital admission permits the identification of patients at higher risk of early and long-term mortality. Early planning of discharge intervention, such as home hospitalization, home care, and nursing home placement (when return to home is impossible) is important for optimizing treatment outcomes. Accurate prediction of posthospitalization outcomes can be helpful in various ways, including improvement of case management during hospital stay, more accurate discharge planning, reduced numbers of rehospitalizations, and better targeting of patients to different services, including specialized geriatric programs (6).


    Acknowledgments
 
Address correspondence to Lawrence Z. Rubenstein, Sepulveda VA Medical Center, 16111 Plummer Street (11E), Sepulveda, CA 91343. E-mail: laurence.rubenstein{at}med.va.gov or Maria Ponzetto, Medical and Surgical Department, Geriatric Section, University of Torino, Corso Bramante, 88, 10126 Torino, Italy. E-mail: fabrizio.fabris{at}unito.it

Received December 17, 2002

Accepted January 6, 2003


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Palmer RM. Acute care. In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Ettinger WH, Halter JB, Outslander JG, eds. Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. 4th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999:483–487.
  2. McCusker J, Kakuma R, Abrahamowicz M. Predictors of functional decline in hospitalized elderly patients: a systematic review. J Gerontol Med Sci.. 2002;57A:M569-M577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Thomas DR. Focus on functional decline in hospitalized older adults. J Gerontol Med Sci.. 2002;57A:M567-M568.[Free Full Text]
  4. Fried LP, Kronmal RA, Newman AB, et al. Risk factors for 5-year mortality in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. JAMA.. 1998;279:585-592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cohen HJ, Saltz CC, Samsa G, McVey L, Davis D, Feussner JR. Predictors of two-year post-hospitalization mortality among elderly veterans in a study evaluating a geriatric consultation team. J Am Geriatr Soc.. 1992;40:1231-1235.[Medline]
  6. Narain P, Rubenstein LZ, Wieland GD, et al. Predictors of immediate and 6-month outcomes in hospitalized elderly patients. The importance of functional status. J Am Geriatr Soc.. 1988;36:775-783.[Medline]
  7. Winograd CH, Gerety MB, Chung M, Goldstein MK, Dominguez F, Jr, Vallone R. Screening for frailty: criteria and predictors of outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc.. 1991;39:778-784.[Medline]
  8. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc.. 1975;23:433-441.[Medline]
  9. Callahan CM, Hendrie HC, Tierney WM. Documentation and evaluation of cognitive impairment in elderly primary care patients. Ann Intern Med.. 1995;122:422-429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist.. 1970;10:20-30.[Medline]
  11. Inouye SK, Peduzzi PN, Robison JT, Hughes JS, Horwitz RI, Concato J. Importance of functional measures in predicting mortality among older hospitalized patients. JAMA.. 1998;279:1187-1193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Fabris F, Molaschi M, Ponzetto M, et al. Dependence Medical Index (DMI) in elderly persons: a tool for identification of dependence for medical reasons. BOLD.. 1996;2:9-12.
  13. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol.. 1993;46:1075-1079.[Medline]
  14. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis.. 1987;40:373-383.[Medline]
  15. Allison PD. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 1995.
  16. Walter LC, Brand RJ, Counsell SR, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic index for 1-year mortality in older adults after hospitalization. JAMA.. 2001;285:2987-2994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Scott WK, Macera CA, Cornman CB, Sharpe PA. Functional health status as a predictor of mortality in men and women over 65. J Clin Epidemiol.. 1997;50:291-296.[Medline]
  18. Burke GL, Arnold AM, Bild DE, et al. CHS Collaborative Research Group. Factors associated with healthy aging: the cardiovascular health study. J Am Geriatr Soc.. 2001;49:254-262.[Medline]
  19. Ginsberg GM, Hammerman-Rozenberg R, Cohen A, Stessman J. Independence in instrumental activities of daily living and its effect on mortality. Aging.. 1999;11:161-168.[Medline]
  20. Wu AW, Yasui Y, Alzola C, et al. Predicting functional status outcomes in hospitalized patients aged 80 years and older. J Am Geriatr Soc.. 2000;48:(Suppl) S6-S15.[Medline]
  21. Markides KS, Black SA, Ostir GV, Angel RJ, Guralnik JM, Lichtenstein M. Lower body function and mortality in Mexican American elderly people. J Gerontol Med Sci.. 2001;56A:M243-M247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Buttar A, Blaum C, Fries B. Clinical characteristics and six-month outcomes of nursing home residents with low activities of daily living dependency. J Gerontol Med Sci.. 2001;56A:M292-M297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Reuben DB, Rubenstein LV, Hirsch SH, Hays RD. Value of functional status in hospitalized elders: the importance of functional status. J Gen Intern Med.. 1997;12:203-208.[Medline]
  24. Fortinsky RH, Covinsky KE, Palmer RM, Landefeld CS. Effects of functional status changes before and during hospitalization on nursing home admission of older adults. J Gerontol Med Sci.. 1999;54A:M521-M526.[Abstract]
  25. Covinsky KE, Palmer RM, Counsell SR, Pine ZM, Walter LC, Chren MM. Functional status before hospitalization in acutely ill older adults: validity and clinical importance of retrospective reports. J Am Geriatr Soc.. 2000;48:164-169.[Medline]
  26. Njegovan Vhing MM, Mitchell SL, Molnar FJ. The hierarchy of functional loss associated with cognitive decline in older persons. J Gerontol Med Sci.. 2001;56A:M638-M643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Corti M, Guralnik JM, Salive ME, Sorkin JD. Serum albumin level and physical disability as predictors of mortality in older persons. JAMA.. 1994;272:1036-1042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Grant MD, Piotrowski ZH, Miles TP. Declining cholesterol and mortality in a sample of older nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc.. 1996;44:31-36.[Medline]
  29. Romagnoni F, Zuliani G, Bollini C, et al. Disability is associated with malnutrition in institutionalized elderly people. The I.R.A. Study. Istituto di Riposo per Anziani. Aging.. 1999;11:194-199.[Medline]
  30. Ania BJ, Suman VJ, Fairbanks VF, Rademacher DM. Melton LJ 3rd. Incidence of anemia in older people: an epidemiologic study in a well defined population. J Am Geriatr Soc.. 1997;45:825-831.[Medline]
  31. Izaks GJ, Westendorp RG, Knook DL. The definition of anemia in older persons. JAMA.. 1999;281:1714-1717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Browner WS, Li J, Mangano DT. In-hospital and long-term mortality in male veterans following noncardiac surgery. The Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. JAMA.. 1992;268:228-232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Librero J, Peiro S, Ordinana R. Chronic comorbidity and outcomes of hospital care: length of stay, mortality, and readmission at 30 and 365 days. J Clin Epidemiol.. 1999;52:171-179.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation


HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS