| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a Geriatric Division, Department of Medicine, VA Medical Center at Northport, New York
b Department of Preventive Medicine, SUNY Medical Center at Stony Brook, New York
c The Rogosin Institute, New York, New York
d Oncology/Immunology Division, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, New Jersey
e Weill Medical College of Cornell University and the New York Presbyterian Hospital, Division of Hematology/Oncology, New York, New York
Shing-shing Yeh, Box 111, VA Medical Center at Northport, 79 Middleville Road, Northport, NY 11768 E-mail: Shingshing.yeh{at}med.va.gov.
Decision Editor: William B. Ershler, MD
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. Veterans Administration Medical Center nursing home patients (N = 69) with a weight loss of
5% of usual body weight over the past 3 months or body weight 20% below their ideal body weight participated in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, with an additional 13-week follow-up period. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a placebo or MA oral suspension of 800 mg/d for 12 weeks. Levels of the following cytokines (or their receptors) were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment: tumor necrosis factor soluble receptor (TNFR) subunits, TNFR-p55 and TNFR-p75; interleukin 6 (IL-6); and the soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R). The subjects' weight and body composition were measured at the start of the study. Weight and mortality were followed up for another 13 weeks after discontinuing the MA study drug.
Results. Elevated levels of IL-6 in almost all geriatric cachexic patients, compared with normal volunteers (mean, <4.6 pg/ml), were noted at baseline. At 12 weeks after the study drug treatment, there was a decrease in cytokine levels (or their receptors) in the MA group (mean change in IL-6, -3.63 ± 6.62 pg/ml; TNFR-p55, -0.06 ± 0.11 ng/ml; TNFR-p75, -0.01 ± 0.29 ng/ml; and sIL-2R, 0.08 ± 0.07 ng/ml) and the placebo group (mean change in IL-6, -2.08 ± 3.92 pg/ml; TNFR-p55, -0.02 ± 0.08 ng/ml; TNFR-p75, -0.20 ± 0.18 ng/ml; and sIL-2R, 0.02 ± 0.03 ng/ml). Although the change in cytokine levels was not statistically significant between the two groups, significant negative correlation (p < .05) was found. For example, increased weight correlated with decreased sIL-2R levels (r = -.36) and TNFR-p75 (r = -.31; fat-free mass (FFM) gain and reduction of sIL-2R (r = -.39), TNFR-p75 (r = -.30). There was a significant correlation between weight gain and reduction of TNFR-p75 (r = -.54), TNFR-p55 (r = -.47), and sIL-2R (r = -.53); FFM gain and reduction of sIL-2R (r = -.59), TNFR-p75 (r = -.41), TNFR-p55 (r = -.42); and fat gain and reduction of TNFR-p75 (r = -.41) in the MA group (p < .05), but not in the placebo group.
Conclusions. Although there was no significant change in cytokine levels between the two groups, the reduction in cytokine levels after MA treatment correlated with improvement in weight, fat mass, and FFM at 12 weeks.
WEIGHT loss among elderly patients is a common clinical problem. Wasting and cachexia (1)(2)(3) are associated with severe physiological, psychological, and immunological consequences, regardless of the underlying causes. In the geriatric population, anorexia and cachexia leading to diminished host defenses are often unexplained (4). Although it is obvious that reduced oral food intake due to anorexia or gastrointestinal obstruction plays an important role in the development of cachexia, progressive weight loss is also a prominent feature of both neoplastic disorders and chronic infections. Anorexia is a common clinical manifestation of many disease states (5). Investigators hypothesize that chronic production of certain cytokines can explain the nonspecific responses, which result in cachexia in cancer (6), acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and rheumatoid arthritis patients (7). Production of cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and interleukin 2 (IL-2), may be involved in geriatric cachexia and/or anorexia as well.
Cytokines rarely act alone. They stimulate a variety of cell types to produce and secrete a cascade of other cytokines (8). Cytokines may inhibit feeding by causing not only nausea and vomiting but also by decreasing gastric motility and emptying (intestinal motility) or by modifying gastric acid secretion (9)(10). The effects of cytokines may result from direct effects on the gastrointestinal system (9)(10) or indirect effects mediated by the cytokines interleukin 1ß (IL-1ß), IL-2, interferon IFN-
, and TNF in the central nervous system (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). All of this points to the complex interaction among cytokines, the immune response, the functioning of the gastrointestinal system, the endocrine system, depression, and cachexia.
Megestrol acetate (MA) is a synthetic derivative of a naturally occurring progestational agent. MA has been reported to improve appetite, caloric intake, pleasure from eating, feeling of well being, body image, and weight gain in patients with AIDS (18)(19)(20)(21). Although the mechanisms by which MA promotes weight gain are unknown, Hamburger and colleagues (22) suggested that MA either blocks TNF or reverses TNF effects by affecting adipocyte differentiation. Beck and Tisdale (23) reported that the weight gain associated with MA could be blocked by cotreatment with TNF-
in Naval Medical Research Institute mice. Castle (24) also reported that those with the highest IL-6 levels exhibited the highest weight gain in response to MA treatment. The correlation between poor nutritional status and increased cytokine levels has been demonstrated in human immunodeficiency virus and cancer studies. Abnormally high cytokine levels may reflect the effects of age, functional disability, or severe underlying disease in the geriatric population (25).
There are limited data, however, concerning the effects of aggressive nutritional intervention on the high levels of cytokines and whether a reduction in these levels can increase weight. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of MA treatment upon the reduction of cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-2, and TNF-
, and the correlation between weight gain and cytokine changes with MA treatment in a nursing home geriatric weight-loss population.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inclusion Criteria
To qualify for study participation, male and female patients must have resided at the Northport VAMC nursing home; been
55 years old at the time of the study; experienced weight loss
5% of their usual body weight during the previous 3 months or had a body weight 20% below their ideal weight (based on the tables of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and the Gerontology Research Center or, for patients aged older than 69 years, based on the Veterans Administration/National Institute on Aging's geriatric assessment tables for height and weight); had a life expectancy of
24 weeks; and had a Karnofsky performance status of
40%.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients were excluded from the study if they had any of the following conditions: poorly controlled hypertension or congestive heart failure; evidence of dehydration, ascites, or mechanical obstruction of the alimentary tract; untreated systemic infections or other serious intercurrent illnesses; received steroids, androgens, or other progestational agents; or experienced weight loss due to hyperthyroidism or depression.
Randomization
Patients were randomized to treatment on an individual basis by means of a random number table.
Blinding
Patients and staff (with the exception of the statistician responsible for randomization and the pharmacist who dispensed the study drug) were blinded to study treatment throughout the active treatment phase and the 3-month follow-up period.
Study Treatment and Evaluations
The study drug and placebo were supplied in identical containers with nonidentifying labels. The baseline evaluation included a medical history, physical examination, complete blood counts, and laboratory chemistry and body composition tests (by bioelectrical impedance analysis [BIA] using standard tetrapolar methods; model BIA-101Q with fluid/nutrition software, version 3.1b, RJL Systems, Clinton Township, MI) (26). Weight and body compositions were determined at 4-week intervals. We used the same scale (marked with scale number) each time a patient was weighed, and standardized the scale each time. If the change of weight was more than 4 lbs, the patient was reweighed twice within the next 2 days until the difference of the three consecutive weights was less than 1 lb.
Cytokine Assays
One tube of serum was collected from the participants (between 12 and 1 PM) at baseline and at Week 12. The serum was immediately frozen at -70°C. For all cytokine assays, samples were thawed at room temperature. We chose to assay the soluble TNF-
receptors, TNFR-p75 and TNFR-p55, because TNF production itself is episodic, the plasma half-life is too short, and random sampling is too imprecise. Increased levels of the receptor subunits are indirect measures of local TNF-
response. Measurement of IL-6 (Biosource International, Camarillo, CA), the TNFR-p55 receptor, the TNFR-p75 receptor, and the soluble IL-2 (sIL-2) receptor (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) was performed using enzyme immunoassay kits (according to the manufacturer's instructions) run on the Roche Cobas Core II (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). These test kits are bead-based, solid-phase, sandwich-enzyme immunoassay methods. The normal range of 141 apparently healthy blood donors in the Cobas Core for TNFR-p55 was 0.4 to 1.7 ng/ml; for TNFR-p75, 2.0 to 5.5 ng/ml; for sIL-2R, 0.04 to 0.95 ng/ml (mean ± 2 SD); and for IL-6, <4.17 pg/ml. Three to five patients did not have enough volumes to run all the cytokine tests (sIL-2R missed three samples, TNFR-p55 missed four samples, and IL-6 and TNFR-p75 missed five samples). One other MA-treated patient was noted to have significantly higher cytokine levels than the other patients for unknown reasons. Data from this patient were treated as outliers and excluded from the analyses. Samples were analyzed in duplicate, and variation was found to be <5%. The reproducibility was as follows: The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were <7.5% over the whole measuring range.
Statistical Analysis
Efficacy analyses were performed on patients who completed the 12-week study and were without major protocol violations. Analyses in this report included only patients who had cytokine assays performed. The relationship between the changes in cytokine levels and weight were evaluated by the partial correlation using multivariate analysis of variance, adjusting for the treatment factor in the overall study group. Pearson correlation coefficients were also calculated in separate study groups. For variables, such as cytokine levels, between group comparison was performed using the t test and the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), adjusting for baseline values. Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean ± standard error. The Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used to perform these analyses (27). All statistical tests were two sided. Significant levels were considered at p < .05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
1.82 kg was significant (p = .011) compared with placebo-treated patients. Differences were also seen in the ANCOVA of weight, after adjusting for baseline weight, which was statistically significant at Week 20 (p = .039) and almost reached significance at Week 25 (p = .055).
|
|
As noted previously, there were equal numbers of infections in the MA and placebo groups, both leading up to the study period and during the active treatment period. In a subgroup analysis, there was no statistically significant difference if patients who had infections were left out of the analysis between the two groups, in terms of the changes in cytokine levels and FFM (p > .20; Table 3 ). Patients who did not gain weight (or reduce their cytokine levels) were those who had infections during the trial (p = .01). The weight changes in the MA (n = 20) and the placebo (n = 19) groups for those patients without infections were 2.56 ± 1.05 kg versus 0.42 ± 0.74 kg (p = .13). The fat changes in the MA (n = 20) and the placebo (n = 18) groups of those patients without infections were 1.76 ± 0.66 kg versus -0.28 ± 0.63 kg (p = .04; Table 3 ). The results of ITT analysis, which included 29 patients in the placebo group and 30 patients in the MA group who underwent cytokine measurements, also did not show statistical differences between groups, except for sIL-2R (placebo, -0.02 ± 0.03 ng/ml vs MA, 0.10 ± 0.06 ng/ml), where borderline significance was noted (ANCOVA, p = .08).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, weight gain itself appeared to be modestly correlated with a reduction in cytokine levels (r =
.30) in the overall patient population (Table 4 ). The correlation remained significant and the magnitude of the coefficients was higher in patients treated with MA (Table 5 ). Although the FFM gain was not significant with MA treatment, there was an inverse relationship between the reduction of cytokine levels and gain in FFM by 12 weeks. Fat gain also correlated with TNFR levels in the MA group as well. Such a relationship was not observed in the placebo group. Weight gain positively correlated with fat gain as measured by BIA (r = .71, p = .0001), FFM gain (r = .68, p = .0001), and body water (r = .58, p = .0001; Pearson correlation coefficient).
During the 3-month blinded follow-up period after discontinuing the study drug, we found that those patients who gained weight in the placebo group eventually lost the weight by the 5th month. Of the seven placebo patients who gained more than 4 lbs during the first 12 weeks of study, only three were able to maintain their new weight. However, those who gained weight in the MA-treatment group continued gaining or maintained their weight. We postulate that the weight gain in the placebo group was not lasting because without correcting the underlying pathophysiological problem (elevation of cytokines), they were not able to maintain their weight. In the MA group, however, the reduction of the cytokines possibly took months because there had to be a change in the underlying cytokine-generating condition before MA could be effective. Another important physiological explanation for the delayed response comes from Roberts and colleagues (30) who investigated the effects of aging on body-energy regulation to determine the causes of unexplained weight loss in older individuals. They showed that older individuals take much longer to change their "set point" for food intake. They found that aging may be associated with an impairment in the ability to control food intake following overeating or undereating. The precise mechanism of weight gain in the MA-treated patients is unclear, but may include a change in the set point for hunger and/or eating, induction of hyperphagia, suppression of catabolic effects, or other metabolic changes permitting more efficient use of food.
IL-6 is probably a marker of chronic stress in elderly persons, as suggested by Wilder (31). We have confirmed the observation of others that nursing home patients with weight loss have higher levels of IL-6 (32)(33)(34)(35)(36). We did not find sIL-2R to be elevated at the baseline as did Manoussakis and colleagues (37). Its reduction, however, was associated with weight gain. Of note was the fact that although the level of TNFR was not highly elevated at the baseline, weight gain itself was associated with reduced levels of TNFR. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a reduction in TNFR and sIL-2R that is associated with weight gain after treatment in a geriatric weight-loss population. We also confirmed that patients who did not gain weight (or reduce their cytokine levels) were those who had infections during the trial (p = .01).
Reductions in cytokine levels were highly correlated with one another (r = .39.78, p
.007; except sIL-2R to IL-6, r = .20). These findings suggest that the global reduction in levels of these cytokines may also contribute to reversal of the geriatric wasting syndrome, although the exact mechanism of MA treatment on weight gain, the reduction in cytokine levels, and the interaction of cytokines with one another are still not clear.
There are several limitations of this study. First, the cytokine levels in the follow-up period were not analyzed at precisely the time during which the weight gain became significant. Second, the serum levels of these cytokines were low and may not have reflected accurate tissue activity. Cytokines function in a paracrine fashion. Assays of serum activity may be inaccurate even when surrogate markers of their activity, such as TNF-receptor levels, are utilized. Release of cytokines from peripheral blood mononuclear cells may be a more accurate measure of their levels, rather than serum determination. Third, we did not assay the levels of IL-10 and IL-4, which have suppressive effects on these cytokines (TNF, IL-6, and IFN-
). It would be interesting to study whether MA increases IL-10 or IL-4 levels. Another limitation may be that we used the BIA software equations provided by Rudolpf J. Liedtke, which are based on a younger, healthy population. There will be some gain in accuracy and precision by using BIA equations designed for the elderly population, such as those of Deurenberg and colleagues (38) or Roubenoff and colleagues (39). In the current study, the small sample size was not sufficiently powered to show significance in weight gain or in cytokine changes during the initial 12-week treatment period. Last, the predominately male population in this study may not predict the effect of MA in a female nursing home population.
Despite these limitations, this study expands our knowledge of the correlation between cytokine reduction and associated weight, FFM, and fat gains after MA treatment in geriatric weight-loss patients. Confirmation of its effects in both genders in a larger multicenter trial is warranted. Further study of the safety of chronic treatment with MA will also be necessary.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 15, 1999
Accepted March 27, 2000
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. R. Thomas The Relationship Between Functional Status and Inflammatory Disease in Older Adults J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2003; 58(11): M995 - 998. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-M. G. Wilson and J. E. Morley Invited Review: Aging and energy balance J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2003; 95(4): 1728 - 1736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Tsilimingras, A. K. Rosen, and D. R. Berlowitz Review Article: Patient Safety in Geriatrics: A Call for Action J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2003; 58(9): M813 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Morley Anorexia and Weight Loss in Older Persons J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., February 1, 2003; 58(2): M131 - 137. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Lambert, D. H. Sullivan, and W. J. Evans Effects of Testosterone Replacement and/or Resistance Training on Interleukin-6, Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha, and Leptin in Elderly Men Ingesting Megestrol Acetate: A Randomized Controlled Trial J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., February 1, 2003; 58(2): M165 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Morley Editorial: Hot Topics in Geriatrics J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., January 1, 2003; 58(1): M30 - 36. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Morley Editorial: Citations, Impact Factor, and the Journal J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., December 1, 2002; 57(12): M765 - 769. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Morley, H. M. Perry III, and D. K. Miller Editorial: Something About Frailty J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2002; 57(11): M698 - 704. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Morley and J. H. Flaherty Editorial: Putting the "Home" Back in Nursing Home J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., July 1, 2002; 57(7): M419 - 421. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Morley Editorial: Drugs, Aging, and the Future J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., January 1, 2002; 57(1): M2 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|