Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, K.
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 62:888-891 (2007)
© 2007 The Gerontological Society of America

HipWatch: Osteoporosis Investigation and Treatment After a Hip Fracture: A 6-Month Randomized Controlled Trial

Jennifer C. Davis, Pierre Guy, Maureen C. Ashe, Teresa Liu-Ambrose and Karim Khan

1 University of British Columbia Center for Hip Health, Vancouver, Canada.
2 Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Canada.
Departments of 3 HealthCare and Epidemiology, 4 Orthopaedics,5 Physical Therapy, and 6 Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Address correspondence to Karim Khan, MD, PhD, University of British Columbia, Center for Hip Health, David Strangway Building, Suite 320-5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3. E-mail: karim.khan{at}ubc.ca

Objective. We aimed to determine whether a novel Patient Empowerment and Physician Alerting (PEPA) intervention would improve the proportion of seniors who were investigated and treated for osteoporosis after hip fracture.

Methods. We undertook a 6-month randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 48 women and men ≥ 60 years old who had suffered a hip fracture and were admitted to a tertiary-care university hospital. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of participants offered one or more osteoporosis-specific ‘best practices' measured using the Diagnosis and Management Questionnaire (DMQ). Participant responses were validated in part by physician report.

Results. In the PEPA intervention group, 19 (68%) were offered one or more components of best practice care compared with 7 (35%) in the ‘usual care’ group (p <.05). In the PEPA group, 15 (54%) (p <.01) were prescribed bisphosphonate therapy, 8 (29%) (p <.01) had a bone mineral density scan, 11 (39%) were prescribed calcium and vitamin D (p =.32), and 9 (32%) (p <.01) were prescribed exercise. In the usual care group, 0 (0%) were prescribed bisphosphonate therapy, a bone mineral density assessment, or exercise and 6 (30%) were prescribed calcium and vitamin D.

Conclusions. This simple, inexpensive PEPA intervention resulted in far superior clinical management than did usual care in a population at high risk of future hip fracture.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2007 by The Gerontological Society of America.