HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 61:935-942 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America

Effect of Family-Style Meals on Energy Intake and Risk of Malnutrition in Dutch Nursing Home Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Kristel A. N. D. Nijs, Cees de Graaf, Els Siebelink, Ybel H. Blauw, Vincent Vanneste, Frans J. Kok and Wija A. van Staveren

1 Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
2 Zorgcentrum Tilburg Zuid, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
3 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Address correspondence to: Kristel Nijs, MSc, Wageningen University, Division of Human Nutrition, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands. E-mail: Kristel.Nijs{at}wur.nl

Background. Social facilitation and meal ambiance have beneficial effects on food intake in healthy adults. Extrapolation to the nursing home setting may lead to less malnutrition among the residents. Therefore, we investigate the effect of family-style meals on energy intake and the risk of malnutrition in Dutch nursing home residents.

Methods. In 2002 and 2003, a randomized controlled trial was conducted among 178 residents (mean age 77 years) in five Dutch nursing homes. Within each home, two wards were randomized into an intervention (n = 94) and a control group (n = 84). For 6 months, the intervention group received their meals family style, and the control group received the usual individual preplating services. Outcome measures were intakes of energy (kJ), carbohydrates (g), fat (g), and protein (g) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) score (0–30).

Results. The change in daily energy intake between the control and intervention group differed significantly (991 kJ; 95% confidence interval [CI], 504–1479). The difference in intake of macronutrients was 29.2 g (95% CI, 13.5–44.9) for carbohydrate, 9.1 g (95% CI, 2.9–15.2) for fat, and 8.6 g (95% CI, 3.4–13.6) for protein. The percentage of residents in the intervention group classified by the MNA as malnourished decreased from 17% to 4%, whereas this percentage increased from 11% to 23% in the control group.

Conclusions. Family-style meals stimulate daily energy intake and protect nursing home residents against malnourishment. Therefore, replacement of the preplating meal services with family-style meals in nursing homes is recommended.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GerontologistHome page
A. N. Rahman and J. F. Schnelle
The Nursing Home Culture-Change Movement: Recent Past, Present, and Future Directions for Research
Gerontologist, April 1, 2008; 48(2): 142 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. E T McMurdo and M. D Witham
Health and welfare of older people in care homes
BMJ, May 5, 2007; 334(7600): 913 - 914.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.