Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heflin, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Oddone, E. Z.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heflin, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Oddone, E. Z.
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 61:844-850 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America

The Impact of Health Status on Physicians' Intentions to Offer Cancer Screening to Older Women

Mitchell T. Heflin, Kathryn I. Pollak, Maragatha N. Kuchibhatla, Laurence G. Branch and Eugene Z. Oddone

1 Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development and2 Cancer Detection, Prevention, and Control Research Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
3 College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa.
4 Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Health Services Research & Development Center for Excellence in Primary Care, North Carolina.

Address correspondence to Mitchell T. Heflin, MD, MHS, 2511 Blue Zone Duke South, Box 3003, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail: hefli001{at}mc.duke.edu

Background. Screening for breast and cervical cancer reduces disease-specific mortality, but high rates of comorbidity and disability among elderly persons may alter the risks and benefits of screening.

Methods. We performed a mail survey of primary care physicians to estimate the impact of health status on physicians' intentions to offer cancer screening to older women. Respondents were asked to read a scenario about an older woman. Each scenario patient was one of three ages (70, 80, or 90) and had one of three levels of comorbidity and disability. Respondents were asked to estimate the likelihood of offering screening with mammography and Pap smear to these patients on a 5-point Likert scale. A logistic regression compared those physicians somewhat or very likely to offer screening with those less likely to do so. Further analyses examined the characteristics of physicians likely to "overscreen" the frailest older women (<5 years median life expectancy) or "underscreen" the healthiest (>10 years median life expectancy).

Results. Respondents returned 2003 completed surveys (37.4%). Controlling for age and prior screening, higher levels of comorbidity and disability were associated with a significantly lower likelihood of offering screening for both mammography and Pap smear. Nonetheless, a substantial percentage (30.7%) of physicians indicated a high likelihood of offering a frail 90-year-old woman a mammogram, and 13.4% would offer her a Pap smear. In general, overscreening was more common than underscreening. Female gender was associated with "overscreening" with mammography, whereas male gender and lack of board certification predicted "underscreening." Lack of board certification was associated with "overscreening" with Pap smear.

Conclusions. In addition to age, primary care physicians consider health status in deciding to offer cancer screening to older women. Education and guidelines for cancer screening should more explicitly address the risks of overscreening among frail older women.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.