HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 61:726-735 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America

Physical and Cognitive Domains of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living: Validation in a Multiethnic Population of Asian Older Adults

Tze-Pin Ng1,2,, Mathew Niti, Peak-Chiang Chiam and Ee-Heok Kua

1 Gerontological Research Programme, Faculty of Medicine, and2 Department of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore.
3 Institute of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Republic of Singapore.

Address correspondence to Tze-Pin Ng, MD, Gerontological Research Programme, National University of Singapore, Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074. E-mail: pcmngtp{at}nus.edu.sg

Background. We sought to assess the validity of the physical and cognitive domains of Lawton and Brody's Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale and its cross-cultural applicability across ethnic groups in an Asian population of community-living older adults.

Methods. Using data from a random population sample of noninstitutionalized Chinese, Malay, and Indian older adults 60 years old and older in Singapore (N = 1072), we modeled the dimensional structure of the 8-item IADL Scale using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and assessed its convergent and divergent validity using known group differences and strengths of association.

Results. Factor analyses yielded two strong and reliable factors representing underlying physical and cognitive dimensions of IADL. The validity of the model was supported by the pattern of associations of the IADL with age, gender, education, self-reported health status, hospitalization, physical comorbidities, dementia and depression, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Notably, cognitive IADL showed a greater total effect on MMSE cognitive performance score than did physical IADL, with the effect of physical IADL on MMSE score mostly explained by cognitive IADL. Reasonably good cross-cultural validity was demonstrated among Chinese, Malays, and Indians, with strongest validity for Indians.

Conclusion. The eight-item IADL Scale has physical and cognitive domains and is cross-culturally applicable. The cognitive IADL domain taps a set of activities directly related to cognitive functioning.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S A M Sikkes, E S M de Lange-de Klerk, Y A L Pijnenburg, P Scheltens, and B M J Uitdehaag
A systematic review of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales in dementia: room for improvement
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 7 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
A. Chan and S. Jatrana
Gender Differences in Health among Older Singaporeans
International Sociology, July 1, 2007; 22(4): 463 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.