HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Cited by other online articles Google Scholar Articles by Béland, F. Articles by Dallaire, L. Articles citing this Article PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Béland, F. Articles by Dallaire, L.

A System of Integrated Care for Older Persons With Disabilities in Canada: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

¹ Solidage Research Group, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
² Department of Health Administration, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
³ Division of Geriatric Medicine, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
⁴ Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
⁵ Division of Geriatric Medicine, Soroka Hospital and Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
⁶ Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Address correspondence to Howard Bergman, MD, Division of Geriatric Medicine, McGill University, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2 Canada. E-mail: howard.bergman{at}mcgill.ca

Background. Care for elderly persons with disabilities is usually characterized by fragmentation, often leading to more intrusive and expensive forms of care such as hospitalization and institutionalization. There has been increasing interest in the ability of integrated models to improve health, satisfaction, and service utilization outcomes.

Methods. A program of integrated care for vulnerable community-dwelling elderly persons (SIPA [French acronym for System of Integrated Care for Older Persons]) was compared to usual care with a randomized control trial. SIPA offered community-based care with local agencies responsible for the full range and coordination of community and institutional (acute and long-term) health and social services. Primary outcomes were utilization and public costs of institutional and community care. Secondary outcomes included health status, satisfaction with care, caregiver burden, and out-of-pocket expenses.

Results. Accessibility was increased for health and social home care with increased intensification of home health care. There was a 50% reduction in hospital alternate level inpatient stays ("bed blockers") but no significant differences in utilization and costs of emergency department, hospital acute inpatient, and nursing home stays. For all study participants, average community costs per person were C$3390 higher in the SIPA group but institutional costs were C$3770 lower with, as hypothesized, no difference in total overall costs per person in the two groups. Satisfaction was increased for SIPA caregivers with no increase in caregiver burden or out-of-pocket costs. As expected, there was no difference in health outcomes.

Conclusions. Integrated systems appear to be feasible and have the potential to reduce hospital and nursing home utilization without increasing costs.

This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)

				M. Pahor Randomized Controlled Trials Involving Multidisciplinary Interventions in the Community J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., May 1, 2006; 61(5): 472 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Reuben Meeting the Needs of Disabled Older Persons: Can the Fragments Be Pieced Together? J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., April 1, 2006; 61(4): 365 - 366. [Full Text] [PDF]