HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 61:176-181 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America

Multicomponent Geriatric Intervention for Elderly Inpatients With Delirium: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Kaisu H. Pitkälä, Jouko V. Laurila, Timo E. Strandberg and Reijo S. Tilvis

1 Helsinki University Hospital, Clinics of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Finland.
2 Helsinki City Hospitals, Finland.

Address correspondence to Kaisu H. Pitkälä, MD, PhD, The Central Union for the Welfare of the Aged, Malmin Kauppatie 26, 00700 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: kaisu.pitkala{at}vanhustyonkeskusliitto.fi

Background. Delirium is a common syndrome with poor prognosis affecting elderly inpatients. Treatment is mainly based on common sense with wide variations in practice. We investigated whether intensified, multicomponent geriatric treatment could improve the prognosis of delirious patients.

Methods. We performed a randomized, controlled trial of 174 patients with delirium in six general medicine units from an acute hospital in Helsinki, Finland. The intervention group received individually tailored geriatric treatment. The primary endpoint was the sum of those deceased individuals and the patients permanently institutionalized. Secondary endpoints included the number of days in hospitals and other institutions, delirium intensity, and cognition.

Results. The mean age of patients was 83 years, and 31% had previous dementia. The intervention group (N = 87) received significantly more acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (58.6% vs 9.2%), atypical antipsychotics (69.8% vs 30.2%), specialist consultations (49.4% vs 28.7%), hip protectors (88.5% vs 3.4%), physiotherapy (87.4% vs 47.1%), and fewer conventional neuroleptics (8.0% vs 23.0%) than did the control group (N = 87). During the 1-year follow-up, 60.9% of the intervention group and 64.4% of controls were either deceased or permanently institutionalized (p =.638). The intervention group spent a mean of 126 days in institutions, and the control group 140 days (p =.688). Delirium was, however, alleviated more rapidly during hospitalization, and cognition improved significantly at 6 months in the intervention group.

Conclusions. Faster alleviation of delirium and improved cognition justify good, comprehensive geriatric care for these patients although treatment produced no significant improvements in hard endpoints of prognosis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
M. G. Cole, A. Ciampi, E. Belzile, and L. Zhong
Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: a systematic review of frequency and prognosis
Age Ageing, January 1, 2009; 38(1): 19 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. Breitbart and Y. Alici
Agitation and Delirium at the End of Life: "We Couldn't Manage Him"
JAMA, December 24, 2008; 300(24): 2898 - 2910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
T. T. Hshieh, T. G. Fong, E. R. Marcantonio, and S. K. Inouye
Cholinergic Deficiency Hypothesis in Delirium: A Synthesis of Current Evidence
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., July 1, 2008; 63(7): 764 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
K. H. Pitkala, J. V. Laurila, T. E. Strandberg, H. Kautiainen, H. Sintonen, and R. S. Tilvis
Multicomponent Geriatric Intervention for Elderly Inpatients With Delirium: Effects on Costs and Health-Related Quality of Life
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., January 1, 2008; 63(1): 56 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.