HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 60:1059-1064 (2005)
© 2005 The Gerontological Society of America

An Empiric Approach to Level of Care Determinations: The Importance of Executive Measures

Donald R. Royall1,2,3, Laura K. Chiodo2 and Marsha J. Polk1,

Departments of 1 Psychiatry
2 Medicine
3 Pharmacology, South Texas Veterans' Health System, Audie L. Murphy Division Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), and the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.

Address correspondence to Marsha J. Polk, MMEd, Department of Psychiatry, MC 7792, UTHSCC, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900. E-mail: polk{at}uthscsa.edu

Background. The ability to predict the level of care received by elderly retirees was compared in a discriminant model and using a classification tree derived from cognitive and noncognitive variables.

Methods. Participants were 193 residents (mean age, 79.1 ± 5.1 years) of a single, 1500-bed, continuing care retirement community. They were given a battery of cognitive measures that included tests of general cognition, memory, and executive control function. A multivariate discriminant model of level of care was compared with a classification tree.

Results. Residents in congregate high-rises (n = 115) differed significantly from those in apartment settings (n = 78) with respect to age, Executive Interview (EXIT25), and the Executive Clock-Drawing Task (CLOX). Only age and executive control function measures (CLOX1, EXIT25, and Trail Making Test Part B [Trails B]) contributed independently to a discriminant model of level of care (Wilke's {lambda} = 0.92; F [df 4,170] = 3.48; p <.01). Sixty-three percent of participants were correctly classified. A classification tree derived from the same variable set was more accurate (75% correctly classified). Age, CLOX1, and EXIT25 made the most important contributions to the model. The EXIT25 and CLOX1 thresholds empirically derived from this model coincide with the fifth percentiles for these instruments in a young adult sample.

Conclusions. Executive control function appears to be most responsible for the effect of cognition on level of care. Young adult norms may be most relevant when the effects of cognitive impairment on functional status are assessed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi.Home page
D. R. Royall, E. C. Lauterbach, D. Kaufer, P. Malloy, K. L. Coburn, K. J. Black, and The Committee on Research of the American Neuropsy
The Cognitive Correlates of Functional Status: A Review From the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, August 1, 2007; 19(3): 249 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. Rockwood, S. Fay, P. Jarrett, and E. Asp
Effect of galantamine on verbal repetition in AD: A secondary analysis of the VISTA trial
Neurology, April 3, 2007; 68(14): 1116 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. R. Royall
Double Jeopardy
Chest, December 1, 2006; 130(6): 1636 - 1638.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The Gerontological Society of America.