|
|
||||||||
RAPID COMMUNICATION |
1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Muscle Research Laboratory, University of AlabamaBirmingham.
2 Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
3 Department of Exercise Science, Gerontology Center, Aging and Physical Performance Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens.
Address correspondence to John K. Petrella, PhD, GRECC 11-G, 700 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35233. E-mail: jpetrella{at}physiology.uab.edu
Abstract
Background. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in daily ambulation activity and task modification between community-dwelling older adults above and below an empirically derived physical threshold that has been linked to independence.
Methods. 20 community-dwelling older adults (72.8 ± 6 years) were categorized into groups based on functional performance using the Continuous scale Physical Functional Performance Test total score (Cs-PFP). Individuals with Cs-PFP 57 were assigned to the high functioning group (HIGH; n = 10) with all others assigned to the lower functioning group (LOW; Cs-PFP < 57; n = 10). Dependent variables included steps/day, number of tasks reported with difficulty, and number of tasks reported with modification.
Results. HIGH took significantly more steps/day (HIGH: 9503 ± 4623; LOW: 5048 ± 2917, p =.019) compared to LOW. Groups reported having difficulty with a similar number of tasks (HIGH: 0.4 ± 1; LOW: 1.0 ± 1, p =.092) but LOW reported modifying a significantly larger number of tasks (HIGH: 0.3 ± 1; LOW 1.4 ± 1, p =.049).
Conclusions. Older adults with preclinical disability have reduced daily ambulatory activity compared to older adults with high function despite a similar independent living status. Individuals compensate for reduced physical reserves by modifying the method of performing a task. Identifying early declines in physical ability through task modification and daily ambulation will provide the opportunity for timely intervention to older adults desiring to remain independent within a community-dwelling environment.
This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)
|
C. D. Etkin, T. R. Prohaska, B. A. Harris, N. Latham, and A. Jette Feasibility of Implementing the Strong for Life Program in Community Settings Gerontologist, April 1, 2006; 46(2): 284 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
All GSA journals | The Gerontologist |
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |