HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 59:M255-M263 (2004)
© 2004 The Gerontological Society of America

REVIEW ARTICLE

Untangling the Concepts of Disability, Frailty, and Comorbidity: Implications for Improved Targeting and Care

Linda P. Fried1,2,3,, Luigi Ferrucci3, Jonathan Darer4, Jeff D. Williamson5 and Gerard Anderson2

Departments of 1 Medicine
2 Epidemiology
3 Health Policy and Management, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
4 Longitudinal Studies Section, Clinical Research Branch, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland.
5 Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Baltimore, Maryland.
6 Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Address correspondence to Linda P. Fried, MD, MPH, Center on Aging and health and the Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-700, Baltimore, MD 21205. E-mail: lfried{at}jhmi.edu

Three terms are commonly used interchangeably to identify vulnerable older adults: comorbidity, or multiple chronic conditions, frailty, and disability. However, in geriatric medicine, there is a growing consensus that these are distinct clinical entities that are causally related. Each, individually, occurs frequently and has high import clinically. This article provides a narrative review of current understanding of the definitions and distinguishing characteristics of each of these conditions, including their clinical relevance and distinct prevention and therapeutic issues, and how they are related. Review of the current state of published knowledge is supplemented by targeted analyses in selected areas where no current published data exists. Overall, the goal of this article is to provide a basis for distinguishing between these three important clinical conditions in older adults and showing how use of separate, distinct definitions of each can improve our understanding of the problems affecting older patients and lead to development of improved strategies for diagnosis, care, research, and medical education in this area.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Research on AgingHome page
E. Guilley, P. Ghisletta, F. Armi, A. Berchtold, C. L. d'Epinay, J.-P. Michel, and A. de Ribaupierre
Dynamics of Frailty and ADL Dependence in a Five-Year Longitudinal Study of Octogenarians
Research on Aging, May 1, 2008; 30(3): 299 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Mens HealthHome page
M. J. Peterson, R. Sloane, H. J. Cohen, G. M. Crowley, C. F. Pieper, and M. C. Morey
Effect of Telephone Exercise Counseling on Frailty in Older Veterans: Project LIFE
American Journal of Men's Health, December 1, 2007; 1(4): 326 - 334.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
F. Lally and P. Crome
Understanding frailty
Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2007; 83(975): 16 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Sci Aging Knowl EnvironHome page
L. P. Fried, E. C. Hadley, J. D. Walston, A. B. Newman, J. M. Guralnik, S. Studenski, T. B. Harris, W. B. Ershler, and L. Ferrucci
From Bedside to Bench: Research Agenda for Frailty
Sci. Aging Knowl. Environ., August 3, 2005; 2005(31): pe24 - pe24.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The Gerontological Society of America.