HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 59:M1068-M1075 (2004)
© 2004 The Gerontological Society of America

Measuring Medical Burden Using CIRS in Older Veterans Enrolled in UPBEAT, a Psychogeriatric Treatment Program: A Pilot Study

Ritesh Mistry1,2,7,, Izabella Gokhman3, Roshan Bastani4,5, Robert Gould6, Elvira Jimenez1,7, Annette Maxwell4,5, Charles McDermott7, Joel Rosansky7, William Van Stone8, Lissy Jarvik1,7 and the UPBEAT Collaborative Group

1 Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, and Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles.
2 Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.
3 Department of Psychiatry, Charles Drew University, Los Angeles, California.
4 Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.
5 Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles.
6 Department of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles.
7 Department of Veterans Affairs, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, California.
8 Department of Veterans Affairs, Central Office, Washington, District of Columbia.

Address correspondence to Ritesh Mistry, MPH, c/o Lissy Jarvik, MD, PhD, 760 Westwood Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90095-1759. E-mail: riteshm{at}ucla.edu

Background. A quantitative measure of medical burden is needed to assess medical comorbidities in psychogeriatric patients. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) is the most widely used instrument for measuring medical burden in psychogeriatric research. Many clinicians, however, are discouraged by the requirement to project the persistence of acute conditions and therefore do not use the scale. The goal of this pilot study was to determine whether the inclusion of acute medical conditions undermines the usefulness of the CIRS. No such comparison was found in the existing literature.

Methods. Included in this study were 95 patients previously enrolled in the Unified Psychogeriatric Biopsychosocial Evaluation and Treatment (UPBEAT) demonstration program. All were male veterans of the U.S. armed forces who were admitted to acute medical or surgical inpatient units and who had positive screening results for anxiety, depression, or alcohol abuse. Two types of retrospective CIRS ratings were made for each patient: one included (CIRS-IP) and the other excluded (CIRS-PH) acute conditions. For each type of rating (CIRS-IP and CIRS-PH), 7 CIRS scores were computed according to methods reported in the literature. Survival time during 24 months of follow-up was used as a measure of health outcome indicating medical burden.

Results. With 1 exception, CIRS-IP and corresponding CIRS-PH scores were highly correlated (.70 < r <.99; p <.001). And, for 5 of 7 scores, both CIRS-IP and CIRS-PH were significantly associated with survival time (p <.05).

Conclusions. Results suggest that the CIRS can be used as an indicator of medical burden even with the inclusion of acute conditions. If replicated, these findings may increase CIRS use and thus aid the effort to encourage clinicians working with psychogeriatric patients to use standardized instruments to document medical burden.







HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The Gerontological Society of America.