Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sureshkumar, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, B. A.
Right arrow Articles citing this Article
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sureshkumar, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, B. A.
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 58:M378-M381 (2003)
© 2003 The Gerontological Society of America

Evaluation and Outcome of Proteinuria in Older and Younger Adults

Kalathil K. Sureshkumar1, Tarang Ray2 and Barbara A. Clark1

1 Division of Nephrology and Hypertension
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, West Penn Allegheny Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Background. The spectrum of proteinuric renal disease in older adults remains incompletely defined. The purpose of the present study was to determine if differences exist in diagnostic approach, etiology, therapy, and outcome between older (>=60 years) and younger (<60 years) patients referred for evaluation of proteinuria.

Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of outpatient office charts in a 7-physician, hospital-based nephrology practice.

Results. We identified 69 patients with at least 1 subsequent follow-up assessment after reviewing approximately 500 sequential charts. Forty-five were younger (mean ± SD age, 38 ± 2 years), and 24 were older (69 ± 1 years). The degree of proteinuria at presentation was similar (4.5 ± 0.7 vs 3.9 ± 0.6 g/d, older vs younger, p = NS), but older patients had higher creatinine levels (1.7 ± 0.2 vs 1.2 ± 0.07 mg/dl, p <.01), lower creatinine clearances (64 ± 7 vs 111 ± 7 ml/min., p <.05), and higher systolic blood pressure (164 ± 8/88 ± 2 vs 145 ± 4/94 ± 2 mm Hg, p <.01). Older patients were more likely to decline a renal biopsy (21% vs 7.6%, p <.01). The most common final renal diagnoses were immunoglobulin A nephropathy (31%), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (24%), hypertension (13%), and membranous nephropathy (11%) in the younger patients, and membranous nephropathy (29%), hypertension (25%), diabetic nephropathy (17%), and minimal change disease (8%) in the older patients. Steroids were given to 17.7% of younger patients and 16.7% of older patients (p = NS). The percentage of patients with improvement, defined as a 50% reduction in proteinuria with stable or improved renal function, was similar among older and younger patients (33.3% vs 35.5%). However, older patients were more likely to develop progression of renal disease (33.3% vs 8.8%) and less likely to retain stable renal function (29.2% vs 53.3%).

Conclusion. Significant differences exist in proteinuric renal disease between older and younger adults.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2003 by The Gerontological Society of America.