| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
2 Department of Psychology, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota.
3 Department of Health Services Administration, Center for Bioethics and Health Law, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Background. Quality of life (QOL) is a goal for nursing home residents, but measures are needed to tap this phenomenon.
Methods. In-person QOL interviews were attempted for 1988 residents, stratified by cognitive functioning, from 40 nursing homes in five states. Likert-type response options were used with reversion to dichotomous responses when necessary; z-score transformations were used to combine the formats. Tests of internal consistency and confirmatory factor analysis were performed; cluster analysis was used to shorten the scales. Correlations between domain scores were examined, and tests of convergent validity performed. Analyses were repeated for subgroups based on cognitive functioning levels.
Results. Long QOL scales were constructed for 1316 of the 1988 residents, including many with substantial cognitive impairment. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed 10 QOL domains. Cronbach alphas ranged from.76 to.52. The majority (93%) of the 45 possible interscale correlations among domains were below.l4 and the rest were between.4 and.5. QOL scales were correlated with, but distinct from, residents' emotions ratings and overall satisfaction, and each was correlated with a corresponding summary rating for the domain.
Conclusions. QOL can be feasibly measured from resident self-report for much of the nursing home population, including cognitively impaired residents. Additional research is suggested on the measures, but the approach has promise for regulation, continuous quality improvement, and public information.
This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)
|
|
 |
|
  L. J. Cutler, R. A. Kane, H. B. Degenholtz, M. J. Miller, and L. Grant Assessing and Comparing Physical Environments for Nursing Home Residents: Using New Tools for Greater Research Specificity Gerontologist, February 1, 2006; 46(1): 42 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. D. Sloane, S. Zimmerman, C. S. Williams, P. S. Reed, K. S. Gill, and J. S. Preisser Evaluating the Quality of Life of Long-Term Care Residents With Dementia Gerontologist, October 1, 2005; 45(suppl_1): 37 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Edelman, B. R. Fulton, D. Kuhn, and C.-H. Chang A Comparison of Three Methods of Measuring Dementia-Specific Quality of Life: Perspectives of Residents, Staff, and Observers Gerontologist, October 1, 2005; 45(suppl_1): 27 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Schnelle, D. Osterweil, and S. F. Simmons Improving the Quality of Nursing Home Care and Medical-Record Accuracy With Direct Observational Technologies Gerontologist, October 1, 2005; 45(5): 576 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| All GSA journals | The Gerontologist |
| Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences | |
