HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 58:M171-M175 (2003)
© 2003 The Gerontological Society of America

Effect of Strength and Power Training on Physical Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Tanya A. Miszko1, M. Elaine Cress2, Jill M. Slade2, Carlton J. Covey3, Subodh K. Agrawal4 and Christopher E. Doerr3

1 Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia.
2 Department of Exercise Science, University of Georgia, Athens.
3 Physician's Back and Neck Clinic
4 Athens Heart Center, Athens, Georgia.

Background. The performance of daily tasks, such as stair climbing or lifting an object, requires both muscle strength and power. Age-associated reductions in strength and power can affect an older adult's ability to complete daily tasks such as stair climbing and lifting a child.

Methods. The purposes of this study were to determine whether power training was more efficacious than strength training for improving whole-body physical function in older adults and to examine the relationship between changes in anaerobic power and muscle strength and changes in physical function. Thirty-nine men and women (mean age ± SD = 72.5 ± 6.3 years) with below-average leg extensor power were randomly assigned to control (C, n = 15), strength-training (ST, n = 13) or power-training (PT, n = 11) groups. The ST and PT groups met 3 days per week for 16 weeks; the C group maintained usual activity and attended three lectures during the course of the study. Primary outcome measures included the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test, maximal strength, and anaerobic power.

Results. After baseline was controlled for, the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test total score was significantly greater for the PT group than for the ST (p =.033) and C (p =.016) groups. Maximal strength was significantly greater for the ST group than for the C group (p =.015) after the intervention. There was no significant difference between groups for peak anaerobic power.

Conclusions. Power training was more effective than strength training for improving physical function in community-dwelling older adults.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. V. Stengel, W. Kemmler, R. Pintag, C. Beeskow, J. Weineck, D. Lauber, W. A. Kalender, and K. Engelke
Power training is more effective than strength training for maintaining bone mineral density in postmenopausal women
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2005; 99(1): 181 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. J. Metter, L. A. Talbot, M. Schrager, and R. A. Conwit
Arm-cranking muscle power and arm isometric muscle strength are independent predictors of all-cause mortality in men
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2004; 96(2): 814 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
S. A. Hawkins, R. A. Wiswell, and T. J. Marcell
Exercise and the Master Athlete--A Model of Successful Aging?
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2003; 58(11): M1009 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The Gerontological Society of America.