HomeLarge Type Edition
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 56:M580-M583 (2001)
© 2001 The Gerontological Society of America

Comparison of Elderly Nonfallers and Fallers on Performance Measures of Functional Reach, Sensory Organization, and Limits of Stability

Harvey W. Wallmanna

a Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Harvey W. Wallmann, DPTSc, PT, SCS, ATC, CSCS, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Box 453029, Las Vegas, NV 89154-3029 E-mail: hwallmann{at}ccmail.nevada.edu.

Decision Editor: John E. Morley, MB, BCh

Background. Previous literature indicates that balance impairment is a primary risk factor in the occurrence of falls, which has led clinicians to develop gross standardized balance assessment tests to distinguish elderly nonfallers from fallers. The purpose of this study was to compare functional reach (FR), limits of stability (LOS), and sensory organization among elderly nonfallers and fallers.

Methods. FR was examined in 15 elderly nonfallers and 10 idiopathic fallers who were at least 60 years of age. Forceplate measures from the NeuroCom Smart Balance Master system, which included the LOS test and the sensory organization test (SOT), were used to quantify limits of stability and balance. Associations among the three tests were examined.

Results. There was no significant difference in mean FR distance between elderly nonfallers and fallers using the functional reach test. FR distance did not correlate with anterior displacement on the LOS test. There was a significant difference in mean composite score on the SOT between nonfallers and fallers as well as a significant positive correlation between the SOT composite score and anterior displacement on the LOS test for fallers.

Conclusions. The results suggest that FR measures do not differentiate nonfallers from fallers. In contrast, this study demonstrates that using the SOT protocol could differentiate elderly nonfallers from fallers for balance impairment. Caution should be used when interpreting information from the FR test in determining a balance-impaired population.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
K. P Westlake, Y. Wu, and E. G Culham
Sensory-Specific Balance Training in Older Adults: Effect on Position, Movement, and Velocity Sense at the Ankle
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2007; 87(5): 560 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
T. Liu-Ambrose, J. J. Eng, K. M. Khan, N. D. Carter, and H. A. McKay
Older Women With Osteoporosis Have Increased Postural Sway and Weaker Quadriceps Strength Than Counterparts With Normal Bone Mass: Overlooked Determinants of Fracture Risk?
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2003; 58(9): M862 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
J. E. Morley
Editorial: A Fall Is a Major Event in the Life of an Older Person
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., August 1, 2002; 57(8): M492 - 495.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by The Gerontological Society of America.