Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mossey, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Talerico, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mossey, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Talerico, K.

Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol 51, Issue 4 M172-M178, Copyright © 1996 by The Gerontological Society of America

RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Effectiveness of a psychosocial intervention, interpersonal counseling, for subdysthymic depression in medically ill elderly

JM Mossey, KA Knott, M Higgins and K Talerico
Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

BACKGROUND. Subdysthymic depression occurs in 20-50% of hospitalized elderly and is associated with physical and social disability, delayed recovery, and excess health service use. Despite this, little is known regarding the nature of such depressive symptomatology, or its responsivity to treatment. To address this, a randomized clinical trial assessing the feasibility and efficacy of Interpersonal Counseling (IPC), a short-term psychotherapy, was conducted. METHODS. Patients 60+ with a Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score > 10 not meeting DSM-III- R criteria for major depression or dysthymia were recruited from the acute hospital. Thirty-five individuals were randomized to IPC and 41 to usual care (UC). IPC was delivered following hospital discharge by psychiatric clinical nurse specialists. Interviews were conducted at recruitment and 3, 6, and 12 months later. Primary outcomes were GDS scores, health ratings, and measures of physical and social functioning. RESULTS. At 3 months, IPC group members showed greater improvement than UC members on all outcome variables; between-group differences did not reach statistical significance. At 6 months, a statistically significant difference in the rate of improvement in GDS, indicated by scores of 10 or less, was observed for IPC compared to UC members (60.6% vs 35.1%). Multivariate analyses confirmed a positive treatment effect on depressive symptoms. Similar multivariate analyses showed a statistically significant positive treatment effect on self- rated health but not on physical or social functioning. CONCLUSIONS. IPC appears feasible, acceptable, and effective in short-term depressive symptom reduction and in improvement in self-rated health. Implementation of IPC interventions for subdysthymic hospitalized elderly is recommended.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
J. E. Rohrer, S. P. Merry, B. Rohland, N. Rasmussen, and L. Wilshusen
Physical limitations and self-rated overall health in family medicine patients
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 38 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
D. W. Oslin, R. Thompson, M. J. Kallan, T. TenHave, F. C. Blow, R. Bastani, R. L. Gould, A. E. Maxwell, J. Rosansky, W. Van Stone, et al.
Treatment Effects from UPBEAT: A Randomized Trial of Care Management for Behavioral Health Problems in Hospitalized Elderly Patients
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, June 1, 2004; 17(2): 99 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 1996 by The Gerontological Society of America.